Contrapoints gives her full take on Israel/Palestine and it’s as bad as you expect.
Contrapoints gives her full take on Israel/Palestine and it’s as bad as you expect.
Contrapoints gives her full take on Israel/Palestine and it’s as bad as you expect.
“As usual, leftists are championing a doomed cause” kids are literally getting mass murdered you fucking stupid piece of shit. What the absolute fuck is wrong with liberals?
🥰
people can have values beyond posturing? What? You don't simply drop your values when a liberal tells you something isn't "politically viable"?
Honestly, in the past, I’ve been willing to lower my expectations for things based on the magical “political viability” threshold that only liberals seem to be able to see, but killing kids is just one that I just can’t for the life of me seem to get past. I know, it’s a weird one, and it’s a big ask, but I just don’t think we should genocide children.
They have zero values, not even pragmatism. It is just sophistry to save the status quo.
They are all for "lesser evil" if it's about electing a neoliberal ghoul, but when the lesser evil would be not arming Ukraine and trying diplomacy, then they will be all for absolute moralism, because of "western values"
Unbelievable, people have an actual cause rather than everything being done same with their brand.
contrapoints strikes me as the kind of person who would say "free Palestine.... from Hamas
"When I am in a smugness competition and my enemy is Contrapoints
the liberal has no beliefs. She believes in nothing other than aligning with what she perceives is the socially acceptable left-liberal position. It should have been obvious she no longer had a soul when she was willingly hanging out with Hillary Clinton. Contrapoints is not a person with beliefs other than she deserves an audience. She's an empty vessel, she's a husk who wants attention. She wants a personal mythology and adoring fans. Everything she says is run through a filter to calculate the best possible audience retention. This is a person for whom beliefs and internal conviction are not an avenue to change the world, but rather beliefs are a malleable problem to be solved by choosing the correct postures in order to gain some mythical mainstream appeal.
The liberal is someone who believes there is a correct position, not necessarily correct on its own merits or based upon personal experience, but instead it's correct by virtue of how much of an audience it can get. But it's not even properly calibrated, it's based on the perception of what a broad liberal audience may agree with. Like I'm reminded of how Chuck Schumer has an imaginary retired couple who lives in Long Island or something, and before he does anything, he considers what their opinion might be. Liberals have given themselves imaginary brain creatures who whisper in their ears on what to say and do, because they know if they only acted based on conviction, if they only said words based on their own beliefs, the only words out of their mouths would be "i want to be popular."
Oh god Chuck Schumer and the Bailey's. His fictional long island family.
You are so right about liberals believing in there being a "correct" position. Everytime I get woke scolded on Reddit for trying remain consistent with my ideology it's some liberal angry that my position would alienate a certain percentage of the potential audience or voter pool or whatever. Well or it's a conservative Nazis who literally just wants to punish everyone they feel deserves it; of course the liberals will defend their right to say that, curious they never defend me though.
She would say something to the effect of that you should put your convictions in one hand and shit in the other and see which fills up first. She'd at least have a point in saying this, but I think the real problem is that she pretends to be a Realist by assigning "giving up" the eternal title of being More Realistic. She has no analysis of causes and material conditions most of the time, and in the rare cases that she does (when it helps attack the left), she looks at it only on the timescale of one election cycle. She has no concept of what activism is actually for because she can't imagine doing something other than triangulating with what is popular already.
The practical material truth of every single claim she makes in this post that isn't about her feelings (which is half the post) is either heavily misleading or overtly false, because it would compromise her doomerism to see how progress has been made by the Palestine activists, or understanding that activism is almost always an uphill battle of popularizing your position rather than always being popular and aligning your actions to flatter whatever you calculate the most people to currently like. Like, imagine applying her current logic to the struggle for trans rights as it was 20 years ago. She would basically tell you to give up because transphobia is overwhelmingly the default position and many proponents of trans rights are viewed as freaks and worse (due to transphobia, etc.). Contra at the time would never say to give up because, however uphill it was (and still is), her life was on the line with many others to oppose the whole neoliberal establishment on this issue. Now, her life is not on the line with the whole establishment, as the Democrat order is perfectly comfortable to her as a rich e-celeb, so rocking the boat is viewed as a threat at least as bad as the fascists. Therefore, people struggling with issues that are not yet popular should roll over and die, and those with popular issues that bring tumult to the Democrats should do the same, and according to her the cause of Palestine is both of these things, depending on which one makes it look worse in the moment.
As usual, leftists have championed a doomed cause
Algeria: Liberated.
Vietnam: Liberated.
India: Liberated.
Zimbabwe: Liberated.
South Africa: Liberated.
Ethiopia: Liberated.
Burkina Faso: Liberated.
Mexico: Liberated.
Cuba: Liberated.
Countless other former colonies: Liberated, liberated, liberated.
But Contrapoints has said Palestine will never be free, so
Doomed cause
Ah! well it appears that the white lady has decided the struggle she has not engaged in whatsoever is futile, time to nuke the gaza strip i guess!!!!
fucking coward, we should [loud beep]
She is consistent because she supports the sides that fought against their liberation. She is not gonna support liberation because she realised her side is against liberation and she chose to double down instead of stopping her wrongs
Nat Turner's(and countless others through history) slave revolution lost and they were killed. Should they have been content to remain enslaved because they wouldn't win? Same for the Warsaw ghetto uprising, which she should care about since it was white Jews doing it.
There's something just so vile about this sort of "Optics liberalism" where it's more important to get "people" on "your side" than it is to actually stand for anything. That being inane and inoffensive is more important than actually making a difference. This idea that actually wanting to do something about a problem is just as bad as the problem itself, this insistence on tiny, incremental steps towards "change" instead of actually doing something about a problem. The sheer spinelessness of it all, while acting like she is "brave" for going against leftist opinion about Palestine and being pro"a bit less genocide, as long as we say Hamas is just as bad." something that might've flown 2-3 years ago, but Israel is far too mask off now, even most libs recognise it. No wonder Hillary Clinton is her best friend, they're both just as tone deaf as each other.
She’s not tone deaf lol. I bet you she gets giddy just thinking about how her deliberately contrarian post just triggered thousands and thousands of angry leftists out there.
That's a good point, she probably carefully crafted this specifically to piss off as many people as possible so she could play the victim, just like her Zionist buddies. She'll carefully comb the responses to this for anyone saying anything openly anti-semitic or transphobic and use that as proof that she is right and justify her Zionism further.
thousands and thousands of angry leftists out there.
All two of us!
Grumble grumble
For some reason I didn't make the connection before, but if we pretend that she's trying to be progressive, her argument is tailism. She's not trying to get people on her side, she's deciding her side based on where she thinks more people already are without any interest in agitating for people to develop better positions, to benefit a good cause rather than just a popular one (and anti-zionism is characterized as unpopular at first before calling it popular to accuse it of giving Nazis cover). It's a perfect microcosm of her politics, where she thinks "having power" means conforming to the group that has power so they support you, as though you can thereby accomplish anything but what that group was already doing.
Heartache is powerful, but democracy is subtle. Incrementally, you begin to notice a change in the weather. When it snows, the flakes are softer when they stick to your worry-worn forehead. When it rains, the rain is warmer. Democracy is coming to the Administrative Region. The ideals of Dolorian humanism are reinstating themselves. How can they not? These are the ideals of the Coalition and the Moralist International. Those guys are signal blue. And they're not only good -- they're also powerful. What will it be like, once their nuanced plans have been realized?
The Kingdom of Conscience will be exactly as it is now. Moralists don't really have beliefs. Sometimes they stumble on one, like on a child's toy left on the carpet. The toy must be put away immediately. And the child reprimanded. Centrism isn't change -- not even incremental change. It is control. Over yourself and the world. Exercise it. Look up at the sky, at the dark shapes of Coalition airships hanging there. Ask yourself: is there something sinister in moralism? And then answer: no. God is in his heaven. Everything is normal on Earth.
amazing things are happening on r/Contrapoints (tweet)
Breadtube was a mistake
have you considered that the label flattens the discourse
Left of center dem, it's time for your discourse flattening
r/breadtube getting her ass, surprisingly
God these libfash are exhausting, endless fellating about shit they have zero perosnal stake in beyond the entertainment of bashing anyone who does anything at all.
I would go as far as to see these people are straight up embarassed fascists but that would require some semblance of political self awareness and education
I think we need to spend another year arguing over the nuance of ethnic cleansing vs. genocide before I can make a clear decision on what side I support.
The time for talking about diplomacy was sometimes during the last 75 years. At this point a moral and practical country would be choking Israel in military & technology sanctions, arresting any & all members of the government & military who set foot within their borders, shooting down Israeli jets & drones to enforce a no fly zone, and bombing any & all Israeli military & paramilitary targets into dust.
I never thought I'd see the lib idea of "changing the name of a thing changes the nature of the thing itself." but used for genocide of all things.
I feel like they thought they were being sly by sneaking in that apparently diplomacy is the only acceptable way to stop the slaughter of Palestinian civilians. Can't let those extremists encourage the death of IOF goons.
The only people who benefit are the extremists whose powers grow from radicalization.
Yes
The discourse should be flat because genocide is ontologically evil
As usual leftists have championed a doomed cause
Perhaps Contra will end up being correct. But, do the Palestinians want us to do anything else? The Palestinians I have spoken to have sometimes resigned themselves to the idea that they might have a doomed cause, have they asked me to stop championing that cause? No. Why? Every single one of them wants to TRY.
And that's what matters. That you try.
Andor's Nemik speech is extremely fitting here. It may be true that many causes are doomed to fail, but each and every single act of trying is creating more people that are united in the cause of opposing the empire. Ghorman is a doomed cause from the start, there was no saving it even if they had the entire enemy plan it would be carried out effectively, but what its doom creates is millions if not tens of millions of people in opposition to the empire.
The very same can be said of Palestine. They may be doomed, or they may not be, but speaking of doom is not useful. TRY.
Contra does not want to try because it does not benefit her liberal politics. She is a supporter of the empire, not opposition to it, and she knows that our attempts to try create people that are to the left of her, which is not beneficial to her cause.
the way Israel is perceived does seep out into attitudes towards jews in general
No it does not. This is completely bullshit. The antisemites will have that attitude towards jews regardless of the situation in Palestine, and everyone else will immediately love every jew who says "i am not a zionist". The only jews affected by this situation are zionists, they are not affected because they are jews, they are affected because they are zionists. Every single one of them can disarm any negativity towards themselves immediately by saying they're anti zionist.
And finally I just want to point out that this whole post exists to disguise the fact she's admitting that her position is two-state zionism but without actually saying Palestinians should have a state.
And finally I just want to point out that this whole post exists to disguise the fact she's admitting that her position is two-state zionism but without actually saying Palestinians should have a state.
Her position really does seem to be "I wish my Zionist buddies would just hurry up and finish them off already so I can stop pretending to care about this."
Also, how did you do that page break thing?
I saw a take on Reddit about her that I really liked, and it applies to so many others:
Leftish or socialist-lite people like Natalie do genuinely like the idea of a socialist or at least much more fair and just society. To them, it’s a very nice and pleasant thought. But that’s where it stops for them. They don’t want to think about what it takes to get there. They want to treat a potential better world like a Barbie Dream House; something that’s basically just escapism from the hell we live in now. This is especially easy for libs in the imperial core to do because while we are in hell, our hell is much more comfortable than that of say, the Palestinians or many other people in the periphery. It’s Utopianism, in other words.
And that’s why they hate tankies, because our focus is on how to actually get there. We support China or support Russia’s and Iran’s anti-imperialist actions because it moves the ball forward. They are concrete actions that are necessary to get to that better world. But focusing on the works involved spoils the happy little dream the libs have. Socialism is supposed to be something that will spontaneously appear without struggle or bloodshed. Being told otherwise spoils the dream for them.
They want to treat a potential better world like a Barbie Dream House; something that’s basically just escapism from the hell we live in now.
Meanwhile, leftists (the cougar is the CIA but we never stop trying)
"Revolution is not a Barbie Dream House, or a sick Hot Wheels track, or a pillow fort"
-8 year old Chairman Mao
It's not a doomed cause. We know the dismantling of apartheid ethnostates can happen, because we have done it before. The only doomed solution is the "two-state" solution that would be acceptable to the likes of Nicaraguan Contra Points: One in which Palestinians are permanently dispossessed and under the military thumb of an oppressive regime that they have no voice over. The only outcome of that solution is further violence. The only way to prevent mass violence is to allow the presence of justice.
'the dissolution of Israel as a Jewish state' i.e. universal suffrage
Liberal zionists wringing their hands about that shit when they can see the obvious nonsense in "Europe for the Europeans/Keep America a white Christian state" will never not be infuriating to me.
Contraporky:
Antisemitism and Anti-zionism are conceptually not the same and conflating them is dangerous but [long spiel about how it's really important to consider the feelings of the genocidal US-backed ethnostate]
Rabbi Elhanan Beck, London-based Orthodox Jewish Leader:
What is the least safe place in the world for Jews? It is Israel. It started with the Nakba against the Palestinians. The state of Israel is a rebellion against God and they will not succeed. They will come to an end. A person who can justify genocide, a person who can commit genocide is more nazi than Jew.
Genuinely revolting to read, caping for genocide is fucking disgusting, and it wasn't even debatable pre-Oct 7th. We now see genocide happening in real time, and she capes for it.
As usual, leftists have championed a doomed cause
The timing of this post . . . sounds like this is her launching her anti-Zohran Mamdani campaign on behalf of her [suspected] DNC sponsors
Oh no way. That's wild.
Idealists always say that there's no reasonable path to destroying Israel through mass struggle and then in the same breath say the reasonable goal is actually transforming the genocidal colonial ethnostate into a pluralistic democracy as if that's more attainable.
Inevitably they always feel the same way about the dictatorship of the proletariat too.
Didn’t read her liberal zio drivel. It thought I’d check the comments… why did I look at the comments… I was hoping some would be dragging her but it’s all just total parasocial sycophancy
LMAO
My poor settler relatives cry emoji
I both detest how the war is being carried out and also not wanting to join in calls to end the reichskommissariats and expel my friends and family from their homes in the lebensraum
Oh shit, shit, no no no no no no! You can’t compare it to the Third Reich! You’ll get on the Canary Mission if you do that! Look, write this instead:
I both detest how the war is being carried out and also not wanting to join in calls to end the
reichskommissariatscommissariati and expel my friends and family from their homes in thelebensraumspazio vitale.
Ahhhh… there, that’s better.
mUh nUaNcE
How-
There was a post from an Israeli settler who wants to leave Israel and to move back to the country where she was born, and ending it with "...but it's hard to leave your home"
They're not paying any attention to the words coming out of their mouths. Head empty, just (fucked up) vibes.
more like Natalie wrong
If she is writing this a month after the 7th of October it would work, but we are at the point where the Israeli government talks about concentrating 600k people into a camp build on the ruins of Rafah that would be used to vet people for eventual transfer.
Natalie Lose
Lose her money by drinking all the time, yeah
i hate the trend of "is it a genocide? yes. will that stop me from supporting zionism? no." absolutely fuck off
why wont anyone think about the zionists :(
This is essentially what she is saying. That's not the point KKKontrapoints; you're not smart for being a contrarian asshole and saying "actually everyone is suffering". How does she sleep at night calling herself progressive but slobbering on colonialists' boots — if it was any people of the past that did such activities she wouldn't hesitate calling them colonialists — as they should be — and go on a tirade about their faults, but when it happens at present she needs a "measured response"; there is no "measured response" against a state that thinks bombing hospitals is a just cause; also, she seems to think that Israel is a rational nation that would've adopted a two-state solution if "liberals" didn't oppose it — get your head out of our ass Natalie, there is a world outside of your cult-like fanbase that isn't at all in congruence with your views and it doesn't grovel before your centrist hodge-podge of nonsense.
The online left has been posting photographic evidence of deliberate and continued atrocities
People are getting mad at the people committing and defending these atrocities
This is beyond useless
"Yeah the atrocities are awful and all, but the real problem is the discourse around it. If everyone would just stop sharing pictures and talking about it and thinking about it then I, personally, would be a lot happier. I just don't thi k its constructive ya kno?"
I fucking hate liberals so much.
I get why she always seems to be drinking, I too would want to be unconscious of my soul if it was as dark as hers.
Also, it just is "but what about meeeeeee!!"
Then she proceeds to act like she cares about trans people, while not giving a single shit about Palestinian trans people. They say socialism isn't a poverty cult l, but tbh every single millionaire would toil the fields after a revolution if it was up to me.
Those two things are compatible (well, assuming you don't mean retirees who have like $1.1 million). Rich people should be rehabilitated, and actually working might help with that, but that doesn't mean everyone, or even anyone, should be poor.
Separating decent people from genocidal fascists.
Someone should tell her:
Poll: Overwhelming majority of Jewish Israelis share genocidal belief there are ‘no innocent people in Gaza’
Echoing the words of martyr Aaron Bushnell, What would you have done during the holocaust: you're doing it right now.
We don't want to codemn the Wehrmacht by lumping them all in with Nazis.
People say this all the time. It's exhausting
I don't really know why I bothered to write this, but I'll post it anyway:
As usual, leftists have championed a doomed cause
What the fuck do you champion with your platform, Nat? Congratulations on being a pioneering voice in letting us know that 4channers are bad, congrats on your incredible victory that has long stopped reaching anyone who didn't already understand that, now what about the imperialism that characterizes the global order? Oh, right, opposing it is infeasible because Dems won't vote for it.
It's crazy how she says that anti-Zionism is necessarily a losing battle with a "shrunken" coalition relative to the "coalition" that includes lib zios, but then a few lines later acknowledges that "Anti-Zionist" as a label is "now-popular," but only to talk about Nazis using the title. So it's hopelessly unpopular when it comes to doing good things but powerfully mainstream for doing bad things, with no causal differentiation.
God, I already hate her, but the fact that she would just come out and attack anti-zionism overall is somewhat more reactionary than I expected, albeit a more honest version of what I assumed her opinion would be.
[In reference to documentation of the genocide and these images upsetting people] Antisemitism and Anti-Zionism are conceptually not the same, and conflating them is dangerous. But . . .
She did the meme. Continued:
But in practice, the way Israel is perceived does seep out into attitudes toward Jews in general. I don't think Jews who feel isolated and wary in the current atmosphere are simply hysterical or hallucinating.
Yes, there's communal trauma and hypervigilance. Yes, there's disingenuous rightwing ghouls dismissing and censoring all criticism of Israel on the pretext of "fighting antisemitism." But there's also a valid fear of historical antisemitic patterns recurring, and that fear gives power to the rightwing Zionist claim that only Israel can keep Jews safe.
Does this mean Israel cannot be criticized and sanctioned? Absolutely not.
But it's something I don't want to risk contributing to if not outweighed by tangible benefits. So, I approached the issue cautiously.
For the first time in years, Nat demonstrates concerns about tangible benefits and the risks of playing into reactionary tropes, something that has never occurred to her when she bashes communists (both anarchists and MLs, especially Mao for some reason).
I can absolutely see how this looks Reasonable and like she's being The Adult in the Room if you're a liberal, and my criticism of this is something it's pretty easy to handwave if you are motivated by liking her output and being overly charitable, but one of the more awful parts about this, and the reason I transcribed that segment in full, is that she is completely vague about "rightwing ghouls" and does not make clear at all in this statement how Israel itself and its entire fucking edifice is based on the conflation that she's talking about, that she's talking about the end result of the primary defensive strategy of hasbarists. She can't say this, because then her statement would amount to "Israel is using Jews as human shields, so I can't attack Israel because then I'd be endangering the human shields. Never mind that millions of people coming to harm was already the status quo and I could try to help interfere, Israel's hostage-taking has immobilized me, even though my hypothetical long-winded video essay would never have a message that could be conflated with Nazi-style antisemitism regardless." She can't say this because she would sound completely ridiculous. (I said "Nazi-style" because I think she could pretty easily produce some zionist-style antisemitism and gets close to doing it even here with the nebulous connection between "Israel" and "Jews in general" she draws in the first part of the last quote).
Edit: Also, "historical antisemitic patterns reoccuring" isn't going to come from the crowd of Leftists in keffiyehs! They aren't the ones who will go hunt down all the Jews for betraying Jesus or preventing their country's glorious victory in the Great War. The Zionist crowd is the one who would produce such action, though in practice in a place like America we are far from there structurally (not that stochastic attacks are acceptable, but those were already going on and the evidence presented of them increasing in number is muddled by zio misreporting, and very little compared to both systemic and stochastic Islamophobic attacks, something she never even hints at existing).
Zero Palestinian lives were saved. Not one fewer bomb or bullet was fired by the IDF.
Then why "quietly" donate to charities, Nat? Zero people were saved? Did all the fundraising, all the relocated refugees, not accomplish anything at all? Or are you just so obsessed with depicting people to your left as useless that you'd cynically misrepresent an ongoing genocide to score points? Never mind the sabotage and pressure campaigns that did actually concretely stop shipments to Israel, albeit not on the totalizing scale we would hope for.
It may have slightly contributed to the reelection of Trump, guaranteeing that the US will put not diplomatic pressure on Netanyahu for at least four years,
First of all, if the war factored into the election, it was the fault of the Democrats for being zionists, not the fault of voters being less enthusiastic for a zionist. Do you not understand how voting is even theoretically supposed to work? This is a real "the Democrats can only be failed" argument.
Oh yeah, and it was an open secret for over a year now that the Biden admin was putting no pressure on Bibi, and somewhat recently became fully a non-secret because Israeli politicians have been bragging about it! I sure wonder there's some other motivation here that has resulted in you putting forth these blatant falsehoods to, and it can't be stressed enough, smear the opposition to a genocide!
Trump is also, incidentally, a menace to me and basically everyone I care about. A perfectly enlightened being would feel no bitterness about this, but I do.
This could be the entire post. Just these two sentences, rephrased slightly for context.
What about the people who are menaced by the Dems as well? Oh, sorry, some voteblues showed me a trolley problem meme and I realized that solidarity isn't the best way to optimize for my well-being on the timescale of one election cycle, so forget about those other people.
None of this is the fault of the Palestinians, of course, who are overwhelmingly the victims here.
Bless your heart. We all know that you're posting this as a bitter tirade against the anglosphere left, you don't need to say it via negativa too.
I hope that someday American policy will shift in their favor, and I will continue to support that cause.
I hope this requires no comment for how pathetic and disingenuous this statement is.
I see the situation as bleak, intractable, extremely divisive . . .
Die in a ditch, Natalie.
Yup, classic liberal where they say they condemn genocide but their main point is to belittle leftists who have actual moral consistency. If you ever need to show a prime example of pearl clutching it's this post.
I really fucking hate that "encouraging antisemitism" take.
I have personally, literally punched Nazis and the only other people I know of who have also done this have been communists and anarchists. I have stood proudly beside Jewish comrades for a thousand causes including stopping the genocide.
What liberals like her truly hate is that we take their vaunted moral universalism seriously, while they see constant hypocritical "pragmatic" reasons for cowardly betraying everything every committed liberal from Robespierre to John Stuart Mill stood for.
Because doing anything else would be hard. They might lose. That wouldn't be entertaining. It wouldn't be good narrative framing.
It shows in how we love the great liberal heroes while she makes videos about how they were like super mean to girl boss princess who was irl trying to invent the Black Hundreds a century ahead of schedule.
I don't hate Natalie. I quite like her, we have very similar interests. But I have absolute contempt for her as an agent.
She's not taking the left-aligned stance.
She's not taking the right-aligned stance.
She is just Justifying...the ethnic cleansing.
Zero Palestinian lives were saved.
How the fuck do you know? Are you somehow able to see an alternate reality where there is no leftist opposition to this?
Literally anything more narcissistic would be impossible to write without hooking yourself up to the jordan Peterson self suck device
tl;dr: liberal zionism
like this is the shit 'progressives' at my synagogue say when I am openly non-receptive in these conversations. this is "I don't want to get into an argument so I'm going to wax about how tragic it all is and how there's 'hate from both ends' but hyperfocus on the 'wrongdoings' of the pro-Palestinians and hope that you think my response is conciliatory enough not to make this an issue"
"Anti-zionism is just an unrealistic doomed cause! Unlike the two state solution, which is totally viable..."
“being against white supremacy is bad for the left because lots of white people are white supremacists”
ok KKKrackerpoints
Attempting to be very clever lampshading demand for her own opinions as demand for 'A ContraPoints Video'- 'you aren't asking me to use some of my influence to talk about the genocide, you're demanding my labour for an entertainment video, I am actually very enlightened to not make entertainment of this'
"Every Westerner is a nazi" seems to hold true often these days...
she was right about exactly one thing and it's that she really did not need to post this
lmao she can't read the room for shit, this racist, genocide supporting, euphemistic drivel doesn't even work on chuds because they've moved on to outright nazism and open glee at mass child murder
This soft-nazism would've played moderately well among democrat aligned progressive circles circa 2012, but now it has the same valence as someone saying in 2020 George Floyd deserved to die because "he didn't listen"
75% of democrats despise Israel, the same soft lib demographic she's cultivated, she's gonna get torn apart for this
many leftists are disappointed I didn't make a video about Palestine
Don't put the punchline in the opening sentence, geez
It seems people feel betrayed by her and her platforming of liberal Zionism, but Natalie has shown herself to be a liberal since the inception of her channel and rise to fame. Her presentation was interesting - perhaps deradicalizing - during the early/mid Trump administration in 2017-19, since fascist politics, aesthetics, and culture were brazenly becoming normalized by the likes of the New York Times, the internet, and media at large.
But her time has past, no? Sure she still makes a very lucrative existence but her celebrity is very niche and echo chamber-y of people who are unwilling to challenge society to begin with.
I suppose this post by Natalie is a useful anecdote of evidence for the examination of liberal fetishism of respectability politics.
Ultimately this appeals to those who are unwilling and incapable of doing anything helpful for Palestine; it seems her supporters aren't activists to begin with but passive consumers of the likes of r/neoliberal waiting to be pacified and reassured that the status quo of their privileged section of humanity is still extant.
Why is this all center-aligned? It's so annoying
Fence sitting on multiple levels, can't even commit to a side of the screen.
Reminds of that great line from Once Upon a Time in the West:
How can you trust a man who wears both a belt and suspenders, a man who can't even trust his pants?
You are supposed to sing it
To the tune of Love me I’m a liberal
Oh, you mean the formatting
God damn, she’s even long winded in text.
I ain’t reading all that
She the type of person who would write a 10 page essay when the teacher explicitly asked for 2-3 pages
Not a single "breadtuber" is gonna call her out on it.
They've all been driven to Bluesky now, so I dunno if anyone here's gonna see if they do, anyway. I saw Big Joel reacted to it but in the most shitty milquetoast way imaginable, which is pretty par for the course with him, disappointingly.
Big Joel has historically been okay about Gaza, and has made posts attacking somewhat similar talking points (like "all countries do genocide" and things like that). I feel like his response might be distorted by their huge overlap in collaborators causing him potential professional issues by coming down hard on this, which itself would be a disgusting logic for not doing so but seems more explicable.
Edit: I looked up his reply and it was meh, but at least he raised good points, and basically called her both a liar and a tailist.
Edit 2: I made the mistake of reading the replies, where BJ comes off much worse than also contra fans and other lib zios are there being idiots.
Oh wow she is against oppression but also for "practical reasons" against liberation, what a unique view for a liberal to have
I aint reading all that but the subsection titles just make it sound like she's depressed.
Doom? Misery? Dread? Bitterness? The whole thing is organized around how she feels. And incidentally never even considers a Palestinian perspective or experience.
I'm just so tired of smug liberals who already got their bag acting like making them feel bad is somehow hurting the movement
This is still just her trying to smuggle herself into a movement she's never been a part of.
The whole thing is organized around how she feels
Reading articles on Hareetz be like
Palestinian perspective or experience
Doom over the realization that your people might be completely exterminated.
Misery from your entire extended family being martyred by a JDAM.
Dread over being used as a human shield and having your organs stolen upon your death.
Bitterness over being forsaken by the entire world.
it's pretty clear that every time she has a twitter crash out, she has picked up drinking again
Antisemitism and Anti-Zionism are conceptually not the same, and conflating them is dangerous. But...
Comrade Columbo never misses.
ColumboPoints
Average zionist position is that all Jews are bloodthirsty murder demons, and that this is a good thing.
Do I condemn the genocide of Native Americans? Am I anti-Manifest Destiny? No. That's lumping in normal settlers with genocidal fascists.
Do I condemn the genocide of Jews in Germany? Yes. Am I anti-Nazi? No. Once again leftists are helping Judeo-Bolsheviks.
Is the Clinton Foundation a major contributor to her patreon?
It was pointed out to her that this is totally false, including in immaculately sourced 500+ word multi-example threads by journalists. Naturally she ignored it.
Because she finds it easier to stand up for and internationalremoved sex trafficker, millionaire spy-heiress than brown people being genocided.
COINtrapoints does it again.
None of this is Palestinians fault of course, who are overwhelmingly the victims here.
who are the other victims hmm? even underwhelmingly? oh thats right its you, a rich liberal who cant square their own contradictions.
Contra as in right wing death squad and Points as in this is exactly what a right wing deathsquad enjoyer would say and think.
"I donated to palestine aid groups" right before stating that most jews love baby murder and stealing land.
In fairness, there are some innocent people who can't leave Israel (eg children) who have been killed too. Mostly by the IOF themselves, for sure, Hannibal directive and all, but they're still victims.
Jesus, scurrying to her redditor sycophants because if she posts this to twitter she'll be rightfully ripped apart is a level of cowardice even I never expected of her but here we are. We've discovered a new level of being washed up.
we need to bully her
Insert that tweet about not yelling at someone over their take because it's so obviously bad it must be a fetish
you make a great point, she definitely gets off on this shit.
Lets bully the fans instead
A normal person: "ethnostates are bad and we should not have them."
Contra: "well you see thats unrealistic because
"Also wanna add some unhinged lore to some of ardent followers. One of the mods of that sub is bardfinn, who can't go a minute without washing zionistpoints feet. Also the biggest biden defender out there. Endless spam about how you don't understand america and israel doing genocide or biden suporting due to civics actually, america has to be israel's ally cause civics.
Just cult worship
Then there is the more gross mod that modded antiwork and the contra sub, who did the same gross shit. But was also found out to be some sexpest. Then the sub quitely stopped mentioning any association or the discord. She would do endless screed she believes tara reade but still would vote biden cause that's the right thing to do. Lesser evil or whatever.
Her sub also denies downplays the american genocide of its indigenous population.
Her cringe power mod depicted as some unkempt soyjak: Nooooo, your post has a Hasty Generialization Fallacy, Straw Man Fallacy, and Fallacies of Composition and Division noooo
Me depicted as a chiseled gigachad: Informal fallacies aren't real logical fallacies.
Ugh, for a while I didn’t mind seeing somebody mention informal fallacies, but it just looks so dorky and pathetic now.
Most of the time it’s merely a substitute for serious argumentation, which is like giving somebody nothing but a ketchup packet for a meal. If somebody mentioned these fallacies while elaborating then that would be one thing, but in practice that almost never happens.
Fuckin got their ass
I cannot WAIT for reddit to finally become so AI filled that no one bothers reading it except the morons who believe they're talking to fellow humans. so many "communities" are gonna become safely isolated
Turns out it is actually filled to the brim with bots. There was this whole thing about how they were using ai bots in one of those political questions subs. I also noticed a lot in rap subs and other places where they glitch out to say processing image or whatever. Its just facebook at this point.
Isn’t that now? How many replies in that thread do you think were at least composed with the assistance of AI if not outright bots? Why do so many start with the same sort of affirmation?
let's go back to ignoring this liberal hag pls
Contra points jk Rowling arc where she nose dives into Zionism and starts amassing a cult following of suspiciously nazi shaped fans that she never questions.
All she really had to say was that condemned the genocide of Palestinians and ended it there. The rest of the hand wringing and couching was completely unnecessary if she wanted to explain her views on Palestine.
Unless the point of her post wasn't to show her solidarity. It was, as usual, and condemnation of the left. It's actually ridiculous to spend so much time justifying Zionism when materially Zionism is supported by the wealthiest countries and the most powerful militaries in the world. When that fact changes, then we can work out what happens to the Israelis in Palestine. Until then, it's moot while the genocide machine is supported in full by the governments of the West.
Condemning the genocide and saying (and probably also giving) money to charity is just an emotional balm to couch that she doesn’t really want to do anything about it.
The thrust of it is that trying is useless and personally bothers her. She knows that her liberal allies in the Democratic Party don’t give a single fuck about Palestine and has thus decided to just be sad about it while chastising people for trying to do anything. She supports Zionism because it is supported by the wealthy, and because it doesn’t affect her directly. She only sticks her neck out even slightly beyond what the wealthy liberal consensus is when it comes to things that personally affect her like transphobia.
She supports Zionism because it is supported by the wealthy, and because it doesn’t affect her directly.
People have dug up her super old videos about atheism when she went by another name, and it had Islamophobic shit.
Condemning the genocide and saying (and probably also giving) money to charity is just an emotional balm to couch that she doesn’t really want to do anything about it.
Yep. It's the standard lib thing of "I think your cause is good and just, but you should push for it in a way that doesn't inconvenience me, or make me look bad. I'm behind you 100% though, so you can trust me, just ignore this knife in my hands, I'm not going to stab you in the back with it."
Under the bitterness section in reference to any anti Israel protest or action:
This campaign had the following effects: zero Palestine lives where saved. Not one fewer bomb or Bullet was fired by the IDF.
the next fucking paragraph
It may have slightly contributed to the reelection of Trump [...] Making protests against Israel [...] Less effective.
You just said protest already had zero effect. How are they less effective. Isn't she supposed to think things good like and yet she can't notice a glaring contradiction I noticed skimming this shit. I don't hate myself enough to closely read it all.
Anyway....
This campaign had the following effects: zero Palestine lives where saved. Not one fewer bomb or Bullet was fired by the IDF.
Trivially disproven by Palestine Action fucking up drones and bombers that got them proscribed as a terrorist org.
No no no definitely not. Those planes where bringing blankets and teddy bears.
She just writes this shit like ohhh my feelings are thissss and then proceeds to write statements that are factually untrue. Just lame.
No way in hell I'm reading all that.
It's as bad as you might think. She can't seperate the Zionazi from the Judiasm.
So basically, the same position as Ethan Klein? Israel is committing genocide, but it's antisemitic to oppose the genocide?
This is kind of really petty but for some reason the do i...? absolutely! does that mean.... no! should we ... blah blah ? heckin no etc... template way of posts are so incredibly common among redditors and I refuse to read it because it gives me flashing images of libs grinning with a smug aura.
maybe I should log out for a while and pretend people who makes excuses for the imperialists don't exist.This is someone with an advanced degree in the humanities. Doing those kinds of rhetorical questions that you answer immediately is something a freshman student would do on an essay.
Perfect for her audience, with whom she is probably in a mutual relationship of brainrotting
maybe I should log out for a while and pretend people who makes excuses for the imperialists don't exist.
My social circle has too many friend/relative of a friend like that for me to get away from it by logging off...
Their horus of anger
Over such insignificant thing as, check notes... genocide.
Doom
Bipartisanship
Sense of futility
I wonder how that person can be even considered anything but a rightwing
how the hell do you go from her video on how "the west" isn't really a coherent thing to this?
This kind of thing reminds me of how Judith Butler made personal donations to Kamala Harris' campaign in the 2020 presidential primary.
She's just providing an example
Oh she said the exact crap right after burgerreich elections. About how commies didn't want to vote cause they want the politicians to have the same positions as them immediately. The position being ending genocide.
I don't even want to read this crap. She and her zionist fans should fuck off. Her subreddit is a mini klan hangout for a while.
What a shitty shitty person. She needs her internet money embargoed so she has to work at like...a store.
My arm is not long enough for the jerk off motion in my soul
lol holy shit bitch you might as well just run for office as a bluedog dem and get some of that sweet AIPAC money
go be the new Fetterman, but for MD. then just fully shift to be Blair White 2.0 (we know how much you envy her) and end your career wrapped in the Israeli flag on a rooftop screaming at sensible people
I sort of understand how streamers who broadcast 8 hours a day develop a parasocial audience of sycophants, but how does someone who posts once a year accrue an army of freaks like this? The comments being like “THANK YOU QUEEN OF NUANCE FOR VALIDATING MY EQUIVOCATING OVER GENOCIDE, WE HAVE AWAITED YOUR MESSAGE FOR MANY MOONS”. Fucken pathetic.
I think she also streams. She did at one point. She also probably has like a discord and Patreon videos and things. Still v pathetic.
Tldr: I am self obsessed and will acknowledge that there is a brutal genocide going on. HOWEVER, I personally know some zionists who actually count as people and opposing a ethnostate would hurt their feelings whereas Palestinian lives are of negotiable. Also, my life got worse because the ‘online left’ single handedly got Trump elected by focusing too much on not wanting to support genocide without being able to stop it, so opposing it is bad.
Tldr of the tldr: I just wanna be at brunch and not have to think about this.
Liberals, you want to make this genocide about you, and actually it is about you. It is about everyone. Same party that can ignore people's call to stop this murder can do the same when killing you. You gotta internalise that no one is free until until we are all free. Only a fool can believe these disgusting monsters that enable such atrocities can care about you
Well, I know it's been a long time since she showe liberal colors, but what a Kautskyite little devil...
Bernsteinite, or one of those social-chauvinists Lenin talked about
She's not even really like Kautsky, because Kautsky still pretended to be a Marxist and had some real knowledge of Marx, even if he grew to crassly misrepresent it. She's literally just a bargain bin shitlib with a progressive affectation.
Oh... yeah, I forgot to realize that,
What Kautsky had before was the best of Marxism at his time, before it was distorted
What Natalie had before was vibes
Please don't insult Kautsky like this he at least originally had real beliefs to betray.
Yea it is bleak not because both sides or whatever but because hundreds of thousands of people are dead and they are not Israelis.
Israel should be sanctioned. At best I support only food, fuel and medicine. But as Israel says, fuel can be used for rockets, sugar too.
And yea, Israel has no right to exist. And especially not as a Jewish supremacist state.
Just because something isn't feasible in the current environment doesn't mean it cant be done at all. No laws of nature is being broken. It is possible.
If the Israelis don't like living under sanctions, they can either leave or overthrow their government. They make it sound so easy when they say that of Palestinians, so they must know what they're talking about.
Oh well if it's not entertaining then no point in open opposition then.
Also loving the standard refrain of the liberal "I have predefined the left's goal as impossible, because I do not want it"
not gonna read all that lol
putting this in /c/gossip instead of /c/slop where all Breadtubers should belong for being fucking nobodies in the grand scheme of things
She's a dog and should be treated as such. And by God, she will be.
I can visualize her taking sips of wine between each paragraph
It's like the liberal version of a YouTube reactionary lecture bro and their obligatory whisky
Anyone who supports a two-state solution is a Zionist
Oh, fuck right off with that shit.
I've defended her longer than most but yeah, this is it
Contrapoints? more like Contra no points.
Natalie? More like Nat 1
In years to come, admitting that what happened in Gaza was a genocide will be a Shibboleth.
I don't think so. In the future, it will be normal to call it a genocide. Today, many hasbarists compare what they are supporting to the genocides in the histories of other nations as if to say "So we should get to do it too." It is only a shibboleth while it is still ongoing, while something can be done about it.
If Israel succeeds and survives, they'll treat it like every other successful genocide. They'll be like "Sure, we genocided Gaza, and it was bad, but it's already done, what can be done about it?" And then erect a Gaza memorial, make some movies about Gaza, and do minimal, if any, reparations for Palestinians who survive.
Came her just to comment, you gotta be out your mind if you expect people to read tiny text from an image like that. Poor form
Not content with genocide apologia, Contra says "fuck you" to the partially sighted.
damn; i aint gonna read that
Thanks Johnny Silverhands.