Number three seems like the equivalent of assless chaps. I vote two
77 0 ReplyI vote three, for the exact same reason.
40 0 Reply( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
1 0 Reply
All chaps are assless. That’s why they’re chaps and not pants
7 0 ReplyI think of the assless part as depending on whether the individual has chosen to wear a layer underneath the chaps.
3 0 Reply
2
33 0 Reply2 is normal cut trousers, 1 is low cut. 3 is spider chaps
4 0 Reply
Part of the problem here is that's a lore inaccurate spider. It shows most of the legs attached to the abdomen, when all eight legs and the pedipalps are all attached to the cephalothorax.
33 0 ReplyThis guy spiders
11 0 ReplyI very don't. I'm a pretty serious arachnophobe. But you know what they say, know thy enemy. Their chest is also their head.
11 0 Reply
Something between 1 and 2. I tend to see four legs as true legs, the other four as arms. Like this:
Legs on the ground, arms up.
24 2 Replydepends on the spider. this one I agree but some of those orb guys are all legs
5 0 ReplyEven for some orb weavers there's a clear distinction between "front legs"=arms and "back legs"=legs. At least for me.
7 2 Reply
Would
7 3 ReplyA week or two ago, I posted about a classic spider blowjob gif.
Perhaps you should scroll through my comment history.
2 0 ReplyWould
Fight it? Bad idea. That's the wandering spider's way to say "back off! I'm going to jump on your face, bite you, and you'll die an agonising death! I'm serious!!"
[Still cute though. At least from a distance.]
1 1 Reply
I assume pants are supposed to cover reproductive organs as well as legs, so 2.
19 0 ReplyUnfortunately.
6 0 Reply
2 looks like a Tachikoma
18 0 ReplyThe question is not "how". The question is "why".
16 0 Reply12 0 ReplyJair?
5 0 ReplyIndeed
3 0 Reply
- Short shorts
- Pants
- Assless chaps
12 0 ReplyALL CHAPS ARE ASSLESS! GOODNIGHT!
6 0 Reply
Honestly, I'm just occasionally concerned with normal spiders "wearing" my pants right before I try to put them on.
To all the arachnophobes that read this: I'm very sorry.
11 0 Replyavarege aussie
3 0 Reply
- makes the most sense to me, because I anthropomorphize things alot.
- would make the most sense to a scientist. (Can't recall the name for a spider specialist)
- would make the most sense if the spider was also a rapper and/or part of an inner city gang
11 0 Replyarachnologist
5 0 ReplyNo no it is obviously spiderist.
4 0 Reply
Ever seen a spider molting? It's practically 2.
6 0 Reply2
5 0 ReplyAnswer, they wouldn't
6 1 ReplyAgreed, spiders are notoriously free spirited
12 0 ReplyThat's why I hang out with spiders instead of people
5 0 ReplyAka, Harlots!
3 0 Reply
Since its main purpose is to cover your genitals, none of the above.
If it is just to protect the legs then 2 or 3 does the job, but 2 looks impossible to create in reality unless you sew it around the spider. Maybe we are assuming the spider spins this around itself with its webs so maybe that will work.
4 0 Reply1 is the old disgusting drunk that is shirtless and almost bursting out of his jeans
2 is as normal as it can look
3 is very seductive 😏😏
4 0 ReplyNumber two, unless it's a slutty spider. Then number one.
4 0 ReplyI saw (I think) the original instance of this meme.
Every time I forget it, another evolution of it pops up.
I love it.
4 0 Replyhttps://mander.xyz/post/19090429
Like this
3 0 ReplyHmmm, how does it get its change out of its pocket?
3 0 ReplyOnly when molting
1 0 ReplySpiders never change.
1 0 Reply
Like a hat
3 0 ReplyI think somewhere between 2 and 3. 3 looks weird because the spider's ass is uncovered (it's like if your pants ended at the crotch) and 2 looks more like a spider jumpsuit or pants pulled over the belly.
2 0 ReplyIf your primary means of housing came out of your ass, you’d probably embrace the assless slacks too
1 0 Reply
Spiders wear onesies.
2 0 Reply2 looks like a the head of a dick poking out
2 1 ReplyIt would have to be 3 unless 1 and 2 had holes in the back or no spider web.
1 0 Reply