Installing arch is fun but endeavour is just so much faster and the end result is the same for me
Controversial take, endeavor is Arch. Just without the major hurdles. I installed Gentoo once. I learned a lot. Things like, I never want to do that again. It was cool and all. But I'm good with click, install, and get on with my life. I do however like rolling releases and not having to wait years to have less outdated versions. Though to some extent flat paks are slowly alleviating that.
Also for some reason the image gives me serious Sam vibes.
Same, I would just configure Arch to be like EOS anyway so I may as well make it easier on myself.
That was kinda my experience as well when I ran vanilla Arch for a bit, First day was just finding and installing stuff that already came on Endeavour.
After I had an SSD issue had to switch to another drive I didn't really see grabbing regular Arch again as worth the extra hassle.
Took me three tries not to read "Installing arch is a fun endeavour but is just so much faster..." lmao
I use void which is kind of like arch but it trades software availability for making it less likely to bork itself. I'm really pissed that I can't have virtual box or monodevelop on here. There certain c# related things that can only be done with either monodevelop or Microsoft Visual Studio. Next time I do a distro reinstall I'm going with Debian.
And it is just arch after all, which is a good thing
Hannah Montana Linux is behind you
A head pops out of the water
“Just use miiiiint!”
it's me.
They explode making a 'btw' sound.
More like immutable distros
I suppose you're right, it is about time I play some Serious Sam again
I tried installing Arch once about 10 years ago. I couldn't get it to work even though I admittedly didn't try my hardest. I was in a PhD program at the time, so my mental resources and time were quite limited. Still, I had real experience as a sysadmin, so I wasn't entirely computer illiterate. Every time I see a potential user switching to Linux asking for distro recommendations and others suggests Arch, I internally roll my eyes. Unless that user is a computer programmer or similar looking to prove their skills to themselves, that is a great way to get someone to never switch to Linux because they will more than likely become overwhelmed with the installation.
If you are switching to Linux for the first time and don't want to spend a frustrating week reading a wiki and troubleshooting lots of minute but consequential issues, don't start with Arch! Linux Mint is by far the easiest for new users. Give it a run for a while until you feel like switching to more demanding distros.
I've installed Gentoo from a stage1 install. I've kept the same KDE Neon install running for over a decade, including moving the 3 SSDs that made up the install to another desktop.
But I've never managed to successfully bootstrap an arch system.
What was the problem? I can see that if you don't get past one of the steps described in the wiki, then you're blocked. But I think if one has some experience with shell, CLIs and TUIs, it should be possible to follow the steps until you have a bootable system.
Is it worth it to try that, maybe through multiple attempts? Idk.
i swear every post ive seen by this account has frustrated me to no end teb years ago is a lot of time for things to change and installing arch took me 2 hrs without archinstall the first time times have changed im not recommending arch for beginners because no one rtfm but god damn thats an ignorant statement
It's it already rewritten in Rust?
I love serious Sam
If you're not a beginner it's one of the most suitable for experienced users
Try Gentoo
Aaaaaaarrrcccchh yourself!
There's a joke in here somewhere about Arch users being headless lmao
