nuanceposting rule

It's not on women to soften their complaints of rape and harassment to try to prevent men from becoming incels and Nazis.

For Fucks Sake

Men can deal with the very mild discomfort of being occasionally reminded women have to always be vigilant.

- Do you realise how pathetic you sound? Women are told to shut their mouth and keep their opinions to themselves all the fucking time. It’s time for men like you to realise that sometimes yeah you should shut up and yeah your opinion is less important than the lived experience of women when it comes down to sexism and SA. Educate yourself please before you embarrass yourself even more.
  Invisible women is a great book to start. Very easy to read and full of interesting statistics.
- Hey! I am here to tell you don’t shut up. ❤️
  I am listening to and validating your stories. I don’t appreciate the other commenters jumping down your throat in this context.
  There are a lot of emotions running high on all sides. What is needed is a deep breath and open mindedness but that is hard under a post that is already a reaction to a reaction.
  If you haven’t already, check out !mensliberation@lemmy.ca, seen some positive stuff over there and I think you could find mutual value :)
- It's not personal. You aren't just a man, right?
absolutely agree ❤️
which is why i am very thankful for those who put in patience and effort into encouraging young men to see their shortcomings ~ outside the context of women voicing their experiences ~ in order to achieve a more equitable future for all
Stopping the progressive downfall of society is on all of society, period. What's the end game of alienating half the race?
You're right about one thing. Women can't make men not rape, and it doesn't really fall to them. Does it fall to the good guys, though? The ones who already don't rape and stand up to their peers who have toxic ideas? And, really, are you reaching anyone who needs to hear it with rhetoric like this?
Changing society is a game everyone has to be on board with. Everyone makes up society, so you can't just tell half of them they're not fit and expect it just to work out. Sure, not all men, but quite frankly I'm tired of having to be "one of the good ones". We already decided labeling someone one of the good ones wasn't right with black people, we really need to have that fight again?
- Does it fall to the good guys, though? The ones who already don’t rape and stand up to their peers who have toxic ideas?
  Yes, precisely. If the majority of men don't change the culture by standing up for women and against low-key misogyny that's everywhere then nothing will change and they aren't really "good guys".
  And, really, are you reaching anyone who needs to hear it with rhetoric like this?
  Dunno. But there's certainly a LOT of misogynists on Lemmy and I'm going to keep pushing back against them. They probably think they're feminists, too. Quoting bear statistics, saying "not all men", equivocating gender and race relations, telling women to "tone down" their complains so they don't alienate rapists and potential rapists.
  Sure, not all men, but quite frankly I’m tired of having to be “one of the good ones”.
  Lol, don't fret. With an attitude like that, you aren't.
  black people
  We aren't talking about race, honey. If they think you can just swap labels you REALLY don't understand what's going on. No surprise.
- Do tell how I am being transphobic. I did not speak of sex nor cis/trans distinctions. And binary trans people (cannot speak to nonbinary) have experience as both genders.
  Also how is this pointless? The entire discussion revolves around the Patriarchy: a social system that gives dominance to men. Gender is at the heart of it. Trying to apply this discussion to other fields falls short because it is discussing the nuances of gender politics and the Patriarchy in particular. Which is why trying to overlay this discussion onto race or nationality doesn't make sense (referring to other common arguments, not this thread in particular).

Dudes need to sack up and realize there's a lot of dudes out there that are creepy. It's up to you as a stand up dude to call these creepy dudes out when they act up. Women don't owe you anything, you stand up for them because it's the right thing to do, and not because you want sex.

Being a model and force of positive masculinity is chad, sigma-pilled, and hot as hell. 🙂‍↕️🥵🐺💪
Telling dudes to sack up is toxic masculinity. I thought we were against that.
- Nothing wrong with masculinity. Toxic masculinity is what we are against.
- Not in the context of the statement. If I punched them in the shoulder and said "sack up and don't rub it" that would be toxic, sure. Instead I'm saying sack up/man up and have a higher level of emotional intelligence which is not exactly a classic toxic masculinity trait.
Absolutely. Unfortunately, I think the biggest impact of decent men standing up for fair treatment for women will simply be to make the cretins run back under their rocks - certainly good, but not enough. It'll take generational change, changing the way boys are raised, the kind that's been slowly happening with each successive wave of feminism, to truly solve this problem.
I was lucky enough to have a mother who was, despite being otherwise fairly conservative, unyieldingly feminist (in practice and speech, if not in labeling). I was raised with the knowledge that women, fundamentally, are people (gasp), for better and worse, and that society unfairly discriminates against women and harasses them for no other reason than the petty cruelty of a few who benefit and the many who are easily misled or hope to benefit.
Muslims need to sack up and realize there's a lot of Muslims out there that are creepy. It's up to you as a stand up Muslim to call these creepy Muslims out when they act up. Normal people don't owe you anything, you stand up for them because it's the right thing to do, and not because you want acceptance.
- Yes but do you condemn Hamas.
- But people actually choose to support a book that suggests stoning gay people to death. It's not an inherent part of what you are.

The fact that is post got removed for trolling is exactly why my feelings towards the bear meme have evolved from annoyed to "Reminded of the multiple times women have attempted to use cops as a weapon against me"

This has happened to you multiple times? In what type of situation does this happen to you?
- Bad people who happen to be women, know that they will be given the benefit of the doubt, and can 911 during an argument
Holy shit I am so sorry this happened to you!?! That is not cool.
ACAB and also abusive women can kick rocks

Know what tipped me off that Lemmy really doesn't get nuance?

There was an article about a ride-share / taxi company that cateted to women and provided drivers who were also women, to make them feel safer getting a ride.

The comments were absolutely venomous, calling it out as "sexism" and how "what's to stop me from identifying as a woman and calling? They can't refuse me!" which.... fuckin' oof.

But I figured out why they're upset: because they want people to be treated equally instead of acknowledging that some people have different needs that may require extra services to level the playing field.

Equality vs. Equity.

Wait Cabracadabra is real!?
I agree with your comment though, taking special care for vulnerable populations is important and when in a privileged position can (incorrectly) feel like exclusion.
I think young men who are at a particular vulnerable and formative age seek community and to make their impression on the world.
That feeling has been weaponized by alt-right influencers to start a culture war in order to stifle class conflict.
💯💯💯
Since discovering I'm trans I've shaken myself out of this hardcore "rational" mindset that I feel is poisoning the internet.
It's the moderate point of view that the marginalized needs to remain "civil" and shouldn't get overly emotional or say anything hyperbolic.
Every statement needs to be followed with multiple asterisks responding to every possible angle of your statement. All until everything boils down to tepid "bad things are bad" statements, or writing things off as "case by case".
It's this hyperdrive to remain unbiased to the point that taking any stance reveals your biased and you lose.
Our ability to sit around and debate all day like greek philosophers is a recent luxury that's drying up. We need to commit to action, and action requires strong emotional stances.

Everyone has a right to be heard.

Everyone has a right to their pain.

Someone else's pain being acknowledged and addressed does not invalidate yours.

Comparing pain leads only to a race to the bottom when we should all be lifting each other up.

Acknowledging someone's pain also makes it easier to understand their motives, find common ground, and love forward together
- love forward
  wait i love this actually i don’t know if it was a typo or not and honestly i don’t care this is such a beautiful phrase

I agree. That doesn't mean women should step back to please men, rather that we all as a society need to take the problem of disenfranchised men as the serious issue and long term threat to stable society that it is. This doesn't mean that we need to fight them, just communicate to them in a better way.

Excellently written!
- Thank you.

The Virgin Exclusive vs. The Chad Dialectic

looks up what those words mean
so true

EDIT: Post has restored and it turned out to be a misunderstanding! Thank you to the mod team for being really chill about this. :)

You guys have no clue how sad I am that the mods did this. I reached out for an explanation, but nothing so far, and all that positive discussion and holding each other accountable is just wiped out, meanwhile all of the other posts full of straight up misogynistic hate and flaming is still up. Guess this is what I get for trying to be a good actor online.

Take heart. Should the reason be less than stellar, the fediverse protects you by offering numerous venues to share your thoughts.
Fundamentally, you only require an audience who wishes to hear. You were able to come to this place and share anyway. No one can dominate the discussion. It’s a beautiful thing.
- Honestly serves me right for trusting any .world community without JonsJava as a mod. 😝 JonsJava and the Blahaj mods are what make this platform bearable.
  Edit: The mods reached out and were actually very kind about the misunderstanding. No hard feelings!

I'm not sure youth disenfranchisement is caused by bad rhetoric considering the other causes like wealth inequality and generally poor life fulfillment

No, not caused by, it just feeds the confirmation bias of people who are already on that mental path.
Being kind and understanding to bigoted men has done nothing for feminism. This meme is ignorant of the feminist struggle.
- I am not calling to be kind and understanding to bigoted men for sure!
  I am calling to be kind and understanding to young men (often ages 10-20) who are very manipulable and succeptible to the massive anti feminist propaganda machine. Hope this clarifies that very important distinction. :)

everyone knows you catch more flies with honey and all of that
The best part of this metaphor is that it's incorrect. You catch more flies with vinegar than honey.
When these people come out and say things like “women are just as bad as men“ anytime sexual violence is brought up, which is categorically untrue, there has to be pushback or these ridiculous notions get normalized and internalized.
Absolutely agree. Please do this :)
When it comes to the Internet, there is a very serious right wing problem
AKA mostly Russian trolls pushing for division and ultimately civil war, and CCP trolls doing their thing, depending on the issue.

I saw your post and don't think it should have been removed, let alone banned, but I don't think you did yourself any favours in the comments. You kept asserting it as fact that there is a huge problem with silencing SA survivors, and when asked to give evidence, the only thing you had was three comments in the same thread, where the one sexist guy was being downvoted and the multiple people correcting him were upvoted. Not good evidence of a systemic problem.

(Ironically, you now do have that evidence, in the form of your ban.)

Literally no. Entirely different post you are referencing, one that is still up in fact.
Many of the votes reversed after I made this post due to brigading. Careful, you are spreading a bit of misinformation here, dude. :)
- You are being very deceitful here, dude
  Wow, rude. An honest mistake is not deceit.
  Are you sure the one that got taken down wasn't just because you were being an arse to people for no reason, like you are here?
  Anyway, I'm glad the one I saw did not get you removed or banned. As I said, it wouldn't have deserved that.

How does the man/bear discussion disenfranchise and antagonize young men?

On top of not being a creeper, you also need to bathe regularly to get a chance at a date.

Does the fact that you have to bathe regularly antagonize and disenfranchise young men?

I would argue the man/bear thought experiment gives young men a useful look inside the average womans life that they wouldn't have had otherwise.

I don't read this as the discussion disenfranchising young men, rather just stating that the broader disenfranchisement of the working class has its effect of making many men vulnerable to far right rhetoric of a day where many white cis-het men did not have to try, like at all (at least, that's the rhetoric).
I read this as saying that we need to counter these societal issues on multiple fronts; not pandering to right-wing men, while also not letting the far right rhetoric take hold of younger men. Offering a good alternative which actually helps them (leftism) instead.
- Exactly this. ^^^ Excellent expression of my position, thanks homie :)
- I see, I may have misinterpreted it.
One of these things (bathing) is a trait you can have, and change. The other (maleness) is one that you cannot (reasonably, for most people) change.
It's easy enough to be told "I don't want to interact with you because you smell" - I can change that with just a bit of effort. It sucks to hear "I'd rather interact with a bear, because you're a male." That's something I have no control over. You're telling me that a fundamental aspect of my existence means that I'm a threat to you, and that I can't be trusted around.
Quite simply, replace "man" with "black person" and try the whole experiment again, you'll probably see how gross the argument is.
- Your feelings are valid, but so are women's. If 1 out of every 6 of my friends got shot by a black person, then I would rather be in the woods with the bear instead of a black person. Now, does that justify treating black people badly and avoiding them, no. You can have a feeling and understand why it is bad and racist and not act on it. Do women avoid men, no. Feelings are not the same as actions. You can be afraid of what might happen while going out on a first date with a man.
  The outcome man/bear thought experiment never said that all men are bad/rapists.
  Can you change it, yes. But it is harder (societal changes).
  Make sure your male friends understand consent. The 1 out of 6 number is how many women who have experienced sexual violence against them.
  I know a lot of women watch crime scene investigations. Maybe throw some real statistics about crime in those shows, so that women don't get the idea that there is a murderer around every corner.

This post got banned from !memes@lemmy.world for reason “Troll Posting” which is Very Disrespectful in my opinion. 😕

I find it really disrespectful as well since it was one of the most productive and well tempered OPs on this whole drama arc, at least on Lemmy.

I was "groomed" into the far-right around 2006-2010, and I have to say progressives always understood me much better than anyone on the right. Best the right could do is blame my single mother for remarrying to an abusive jerk due to financial necessity, my father for not taking me with himself to my also abusive stepmother (my actual parents also needed a lot of self-reflection to be at least tolerable), and of course the same scaremongering and Jordan Peterson-level life "advices" that are popular today. They were way more transparent about not understanding gaming and the likes, unlike today's right that pretends to care about it with its gamergates and similar culture war talking points.

Thanks for sharing that experience wow!
And welcome back to the cool as hell, progressive, respecting of human dignity club 💖🙂‍↕️🐺💪 we missed you

I was wondering where this post went. I was so confused when it dissapeared - someone in the comments had mentioned a community called "nuance posting" or something and I was trying to find it :\

yeah that was me 😭 the community doesn’t exist but itd be cool if it did

Why do you capitalize very disrespectful?

Emphasis because im Upset lol
- I like your style.
  No punctuation just capitalization!
- I find in my culture only people over 60 capitalize for emphasis, but I've seen many young people from other cultures do it. I'm curious if you would categorize yourself as young or old? This topic has been of interest to me for years.

If you were alone in the woods, would you rather encounter a bear or a man?
- I get their reasoning but seeing every other TikTok being about it (either women against men or men crying about when picking bears) is just too much. It seems too much about picking a side now and no discussion is happening. I just block anyone that pays about it on TikTok.

We should all post this there.

no do not brigade
i appreciate your sentiment but i am not calling for a brigade

I think a lot of people also miss the practical element. It sucks for men that they're a potential threat until proven otherwise, but can you blame women for taking measures that objectively improve their safety? I don't think anyone likes that women don't trust men, but, as it currently stands, the alternative is worse.