Women: exist to be taken or given away. Totally not a virulent sexist idea that runs parallel to racism 9 out of 10 times.
I fucking love the "civilization" that elevated this reprobate dumbass to unforetold heights of power and influence. Totally not a futureless dystopia that indicts itself with every molecule of oxygen this lazy apartheid goblin inhales.
If only it was actually happening. Would love to make their delusions reality, not so much to justify their behavior but to punish them for it.
seggs talk, opinion on cuckoldry, me being a smol pp h8r (trust me it's probably fine, I make joke)
Just wish they'd stop ruining a kink of mine... Like I'm down to share, swing, and be poly but to be entirely replaced sexually would be frustrating and might actually end the relationship but if I'm involved enough I wouldn't mind not being the primary. If whomever my hypothetical bf, gf, whatever, was seeing, wanted to rail me too and or was inclusive and not there to just cut me off from intimacy, and was there to enhance the experience for all, then it's all gravy. If I'm replaced sexually, but otherwise we're still very intimate and there isn't this feeling of growing apart between me and my partner then I could see about salvaging the relationship and seeing how they'd like to have me involved as long as I'm not just strictly relegated to a corner. Like maybe I'll squeeze this or that, make out, just help keep it going, idk, compersion is a hell of a thing and watching someone being fucked irl is so much different than in porn and I don't even mean strictly as a cuckold but even as a threesome it's hot as fuck. I think my hard boundaries are just no fascists (low-key... Maybe a comrade who shares what I guess I would describe as penis fascism, AND they're packing more than me [not super common tbh, part off the thrill I suppose, usually when they're bigger they're monstrous and it's just 😩] , so long as that's the extent of their porn brainworms) and if I get the chance to explore that sexual space again I'll do better about voicing some soft boundaries or things that bother me as they come up. (I'm way to much of a people pleaser and will just stay quiet and bottle things up, gotta work on that.) But the idea that (((the blacks))) are coming to forcefully cuck you kinda gives me the impression that you might not treat your partner well enough and she wants better from someone else and your kinda letting that known by how you think cuckoldry is and how it works; that your wife/partner is small/weak minded and a strong charismatic man can manipulate her into leaving you for him, instead of her having enough of your caucacity on the daily and deciding maybe enough is enough and or wanting to explore herself sexually, who knows it could be a myriad of reasons. While there are narcissists and they can be manipulative and they do use sex as a manipulative tool, it is not a monolith or hallmark of one race. There is a rainbow (wow how fitting almost like the pride flag was on to something) of how people feel, act, and have intimacy and would like to engage in intimacy; to think it's a single minded goal to snuff out the hwite race is silly and if it's that fragile, idk maybe it's too weak to survive, survival of the fittest yada yada.
Anyways... Self hating honky with too many programmed societal brainworms, signing off. Hoo-Rah!
Land and women are private property that belong to a collective western civilization which you should identify as, so you can cope with being likely lonely and not having any land. These "things" are being taken from you by black and brown people and refugees, because you aren't killing them, which makes you pathetic.
I'm a little flummoxed as to what event this is supposed to be in reference to. Which country? What land, who are these women?
What does stand out as clear is that bit at the end. "We're not [idealized trait] because libs won't let me be mean!" That's kinda been the rally cry of yankee conservatives all my life. Terms like 'thin-skinned', 'politically correct', 'cuck', or even 'woke'; I think they catch on because there's this contradiction in the hearts of yankee chuds. They're told, buy culture, by church, by government, by school, Youare among the freest people on earth, aren't you lucky?* Of course, there's all sorts of structural limitations, but they don't mind that. Money, markets, property is natural... somehow. They rally against government, because that's seen as less natural to those other structures (lol), view it as some sort of artificial intervention. But what they get mad at, what a chud's boils blood, is when they feel like they can't be mean.
That is the contradiction: I'm free, so I'm free to be mean. But, other people are also free. Except, they don't use that freedom to be mean back at me. They say that I shouldn't say mean things. It makes me feel ashamed. That's wrong! That's political correctness gone mad!! The woke mind virus is trying to cuck me!!! When property or money limit freedoms, that's natural. When government does it, that's unnatural and tyranny.† When it's other people... well, that's just your sense of group dynamics. That's preinstalled, built in. There's no human structure more natural than the one inside your head. Conservatives can't handle that. Can't cope. Their worldview is the Right one! So if it's not accepted by polite society, then it must be culture that's unnatural! Commie-pinko-liberal-hippy Conspiracy!
Yankee liberals don't have this problem, but it's more because they're just not made to feel ashamed as much, not because they're any better at processing the feeling. Try as they might, conservatives can't shame liberals. Communists can however...
All this is to say, chuds can't handle when you ask them to be polite.
†
Yankee conservatives are actually happy to talk about the overlap of these. When government and private property collude, they call it "corporatism". To them, it's bad because it gets in the way of "natural" private property (which is small businesses if the chud is working class, and my business if they aren't).
One thing that libs and chuds have in common is they both believe every single one of their fantasies would instantly become true if their counterpart disappeared. They both think they'd do everything they ever wanted and receive only minimal backlash. They have narrow brains.
But this is useful though, since it helps them hold on to a status quo. Liberals complained that there were too many conservatives blocking legislation even in 2009 when democrats held the house and senate. All of my conservative family members complained about liberals blocking Trump's agenda in 2017, even though Republicans held the majority.
No, this is what he does all day, he fafs about on twitter. He doesn't work or have hobbies. I think he's probably the best counter example to people insisting that the wealthy "work harder than everyone else."