A libertarian posting this is a little too on the nose

So the 14 year old can consent to sex but can't he trusted to make good decisions with the resulting 10 million dollars until she's almost finished her bachelor's? What internal logic is this whole thing operating on?

it's the reactor core of libertarianism: property is more important than people
- Hands off the trust fund! It can’t consent until it has matured!
What internal logic is this whole thing operating on?
You start at "I want to bang 14 year olds" and work backwards from there

honestly presenting ethical questions under capitalism in this way makes it abundantly clear why the marketplace is the enemy of humanity. if there is someone who has the means and intent to do something like this, the only acceptable answer is to kill them and redistribute their wealth. nothing else comes even remotely close to solving the problem.

Furniture and Meat
The adventure time episode that makes libertarians into communists

Let's say a billionaire wants to watch 456 poor people from Korea compete in winner-takes-all blood sports until only one participant is left, that winner receives ₩26.9B. All participants agree. Should this be allowed?

As long as the media reports on it by saying "this is literally what they do in the north" while it happens exclusively in the south.
- Westoids do westoid shit in the west, westoidly: what are we, a bunch of asiatic chicoms???

People who should be legally incapable of giving sexual consent:

Minors.
Prisoners viz their guards.
Anyone considering sleeping with a libertarian.

I AM FUCKING CACKLING
- The last one is really more of a catch-all, since most libertarians seem to only be attracted to the first category.

https://twitter.com/RichardHanania/status/1720992936052306000

Link because I'm not a lib

He's president of this bullshit libertarian antiwoke think tank https://www.cspicenter.com/about

He is connected to university of Texas and his fellow think tankers are employed at university of London and Cornell among others. This seems like a slam dunk to flag a bunch of people in these august institutions and ruin this asshole's day

Here is the staff page for where Rick is a fellow https://salemcenter.org/our-people/

lets say

no no no nooooooooooooooooooo

The joys of these bozos inventing hypothetical scenarios that are extremely rare or outright don't happen

"I'll set you up for life if you just let me have sex with you" is coercion no matter the age. You can't consent to that, not when "no" isn't really an option.

IT'S A LITERAL CHILD YOU DERANGED FUCK AAAAAAAAAHHHH

"Unrelated story, I have ten million dollars and a lawyer on retainer"

Typical libertarian poll

Do you:

A. Be a pedophile

B. Be a pedophile

C. Be a pedophile

D. Be a pedophile

Too real

Libertarians trying to figure out how they can fuck kids like

I've read about this happening in Philippines except its in hundreds or at best thousands of dollars and the girl's "consent" is never involved. Only parents.

link

- empire didn't end it was just worked out to be cheaper to outsource colonial oppression to locals
well anyone willing to pimp their children for millions is probably desperate enough they'll go lower. That's just the free market
this logic is why the market is evil

They're trying to first legitimize the child sex-work/exploitation. Then, they can move on to "Who are we to tell the child how much she should accept? If we let the market work and the girl wants to accept 100k, or even just 1k, why should we prevent her from maximizing her utility?"
They're just trying to use big numbers to motivate the permissability in theory as a "gotcha, now you have to support child sex-work in general" argument. The correct response of course is to beat this person to death as an example.
- They’re also using the big number because deep down they know that, as structured now, labour is exploited by capital. So they put the big number place holder in to appeal to people who would take a big dose of exploitation/trauma in order to have a life for free of that after the said event.
- sure i was just highlighting the goofy rhetorical move.

Should this be allowed

That a known pedophile should have been given free reign to keep sex trafficking and in fact be given so much power and wealth that he could even theoretically have done this? Yeah it's kinda fucked up that we let it happen.

"Okay so I invented this awesome gotcha that's totally gonna own the libs. It's like the trolley problem, right? But one of the tracks makes you a Professional Pedophile and the other one is just a trolley track with no issues. This is gonna get em"

I love that trolley problem where there's no one on the track and you are just asking if I would derail public transportation for no reason. It's so easy to answer!

Hmmm. This is a tough one.

I'm gonna go with..... ~~kill Epstein again!~~ I mean: "No, male." Final answer.

libertarians are breaking new ground in advanced pedophile theory

This is like 80% of anime, inventing contrived scenarios where incest, pedophilia, sexual assault, etc are not only fine but required by the situation
This is “nuanced” and “philosophical” to them.

Very normal thought experiment to think up.

Why? Why would you ask this? Sick fuck

This is the type of guy that goes by Richard but everybody calls him Dick

Not only should this not be allowed, Epstein should be tortured to death and also everyone who answered yes to this poll. Hypothetically, of course.

I was honestly a bit surprised Epstein didn't get more defenders from the AnCap crowd, but it seems most of them have gone Q-pilled. I guess Epstein being a Jewish metropolitan rich guy didn't help, now if he had been some steak eating Texas oil baron...

The tactic pedos seem to be using is to virtue signal extremely hard against Liberal pedophiles as cover. The ones just openly admitting support for pedophilia are the dumb ones who aren’t hip to the program