Destiny

New Vegas was just better. Just like OG Fallout writing was superior. Guess who wrote New Vegas?
Fallout 3 is magical, but it's Harry Potter and Vegas is Gandalf.
- Fallout 3 is a power fantasy. Nothing against that, but it's not what drew me to the series in the first place.

I'd like 3 a whole lot more if it didn't have the subway maze.
They all looked the same to me and I never ended up where I wanted.
- fun little-known fact, the subway maps in fallout 3 are both functional and accurate to how the "subway maze" is laid out in Fallout 3! inaccessible stations and tunnels will be darkened out, and you can navigate by following the lit-up portions. for some reason this is never mentioned in-game, but it made following playthroughs way more enjoyable
  
  That would probably be fun for anyone familiar with the DC subway system. 😂

I have just 125 hours played in Fallout 3, vs. 1600 hours of Fallout New Vegas. The story in 3 isn't nearly as timeless as New Vegas.

- 3's map felt less like an open world and more like a series of individual maps thanks to needing the subways to get anywhere. It's the mass effect elevators dialed up to 11.
- Depends on what you want out of a map I think.
  NV's layout provided much better narrative pacing, which really let the story shine.
  But 3 allowed for much better exploration, plus it set a much stronger tone visually.

The only negative about 3 is the crazy ending.
- Those are some thick rose tinted glasses
  
  Okay maybe one of a lot of issues lol. But that ending was a slap in the face.

For me nv and 3 are interchangeable in ranking more or less.. I usually just chuck them both into the nr. 3 spot on the list
- Thanks to TTW I largely consider them both to be the same game nowadays

Fallout 3 feels like every three steps I have to load a new area
- I actually felt like that playing Half Life 2 many years ago

I bought fallout 3 on recommendation and sold it again a few weeks later. It was boring as hell.

Fallout NV is the better Written game, but Fallout 3 is the better Designed game. Fallout 4 is worse than both in every way.
- 4 is far better in gunplay, courtesy of the folks at Id.
  
  Sure, for the first few levels, until you get to the point where everything is a bullet sponge and now it stops mattering how good or bad gunplay feels when every enemy takes 5 minutes to kill if you use anything other than the highest damage weapons in the game. Late game Fallout 4 is just bad to play, it feels awful and makes you hate the combat after a while. At that point, I'd take the crappy gunplay of Fallout 3 or NV any day. (I'd give NV the slight edge over 3 on that, due to having actual iron sights instead of a generic zoom effect when aiming.)
- You are wrong in two counts out of 3.

That ending was to fix a crash that would be caused if you selected that choice. I know, because I got that bug. They patched it out pretty damn fast with this stupid thing.

Fallout Tactics>Fallout 2>New Vegas>Fallout 4
Fallout Tactics had some fun custom maps and mods for multiplayer and thus will always have a place in my heart.
- Tactics let you be a team of ghouls, supermutants, and a deathclaw rolling about the wastes. I was all about that game.

fallout 4 > all other fallout games
- now that's an unpopular opinion.
- It certainly has the better gunplay and loot'n-shoot loop, but that's about it, like bethesda tried to import a lot of Borderlands in FO4 as they could
- I definitely choose it over both 3 and New Vegas. It loses to 1 and 2 though.