Think about it

This is not a shitpost, merely a shit post.

Who’s to says pre-historic humans never did?

Yeah they have, I did it last week ffs.

Stalin and Mao would like to have a chat with your if you think this is true.
- Tanked to dead, sent to concentration camps without due process... Sure.
  But not stoned!

Low effort, provocative, sorta correct but kinda not: the perfect formula to get some real low-level, unproductive flame wars going. Excellent shitpost.

TIL: you can only kill someone by throwing a rock if you are religious. Do not attempt otherwise, it will not work.
- also: there has never been a single person in history who followed the crowd even though they secretly didn't believe in a god.
  
  I'm an atheist, and there are plenty of people I would stone to death if given the chance.
  So if the number really is zero, it's probably due to a lack of opportunity.
- stoning is a particular method of public execution, so most rock-related deaths don't count

Because they use other weapons?

This isn't even a good shitpost
- It's not even true. Like not even close. The Chinese liberation army forcing Tibetan children to murder their parents to "liberate" them from "religious oppression" is one example.
  
  Where did you hear that had happened
  
  forcing Tibetan children to murder their parents
  Gonna need a source on that one, chief.

That’s not true. Lots of drugs can kill you. Don’t know if they all count as ‘stoned’ though
- Where can I? Asking for a friend
  
  Just walk around downtown asking for drugs. If you dont find any and the drugs don't kill you, someone probably will eventually.

I feel like this is one of those things where, even though there is a likelihood that you are right, you don't actually know that you are correct.
People are weird.
People are occasionally evil, especially towards weird people.
There's an entire possibility that atheists have stoned somebody to death, and since you're the one making the claim, I feel like you should be the one to scour every single instance of death in all of human history to verify your claim.

I don't know about that dude, I've been given some pretty strong shit before. Definitely felt like I was dying.
- https://youtu.be/lSigg18I50M?t=17

May not be stonings, but you've got the French Revolution, Stalin's purge during the Soviet Union and Cultural Revolution - all mass executions caused by Atheist states.
The Holocaust wasn't motivated by religion either- Actual bible-believing Christians were against it. The predecessor to our "progressive" Christians ("Christ of the culture" mentality)
- Yea. Humans never needed an excuse for violence.
  Or rather, we always found an excuse, religion is merely one of them.
  
  Even then, most of the time Religion was used as a justification for the actual intent which was usually some form of colonial subjugation. "We're spreading the Gospel" wasn't the actual intent, moreso just what you told people at home questioning the ethics of you conquering faraway lands
- I'm not so sure of that Christian version of "no true Scotsman", but it's true that religion is typically just a tool used by people with power to direct the people to violence, rather than the source of it.
  \ But man is it an effective tool for that purpose.
  
  "No true Scotsman" isn't just a thing you can scream at everything.
  The No True Scotsman tale is as follows:
  Person A: "No Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge." Person B: "But my uncle Angus is a Scotsman and he puts sugar on his porridge." Person A: "But no true Scotsman puts sugar on his porridge."
  I don't know about you, but having sugar on your porridge isn't a large scale distinction as okay-ing the mass murder of an ethnic group.
  A more accurate example within Christianity will be:
  Person A: "No Christian says swear words"
  Person B: "But my uncle Angus is a Christian and he swears sometimes"
  Person A: "But no true Christian says swear words"
- Found the Heritage Foundation shitposting account.
  Btw:
  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_Christianity
  https://theopolisinstitute.com/evangelicals-for-adolf-christians-in-hitlers-germany/
  And, of course, Stalin actually politically allied with the Orthodox Church during WW2.
  
  Leadership lacked spiritual strength because of serious Biblical ignorance and unbelief.
  Yeah, it's reinforcing my point. That's why I specified "bible-believing". Just identifying as a Christian because it's your culture isn't the same as being an actual believer.
  And before you pull out a "no true scotsman", that argument is moot. It's like saying "vegans don't eat meat", then someone else says "xyz is a vegan and eats meat". It's a valid objection to say that somebody isn't actually something, unlike the "no true scotsman" where ethnicity and nationality are being debated over something trivial like sugar on porridge. You need to hold actual Christian beliefs to be a true Christian.

A fact check of this claim would be interesting.

Nah we just don't write fun stories about it when it happens.

Just needs a slight tweak to be a little less historically inaccurate: Nobody has ever been "hunted for sport" by a Zoroastrian.
- Nah Persia got wild sometimes.
  The guys you want are the Jains. They're supposedly the origin of the pacifist and global brotherhood messaging in Christianity, which is clearly at odds with just about everything else in the history of the religion.
  
  Oh, you believe that Jesus went to India when he was young? Jainism is so far removed, what mental gymnastics leads you to this conclusion?

Humans climbed to the top of the food chain by throwing rocks and that was before gods. Everything was stoned to death by atheists in the day.

But it is shit, which is kind of the point. Shitposts are usually poor-quality, provocative, or off-topic.
- Can a shitpost be off-topic on a shitpost community?

I dunno. There have been some pretty annoying people throughout history. Might be more accurate to say "for not being an atheist."
- Cultural Revolution...

Not for lack of wanting to... Hooray for impulse control.

Stalin was an atheist and he was responsible for killing at least 6 million people.
- Yeah, but not with stones 🪨
  
  Important distinction
- I believe the lesson here is that marijuana just isn't toxic enough to kill anyone.
  
  Is marijuana atheist? I mean, it has Mary in the name. Also, Rastafarians consider it a holy plant and use it for sacramental purposes.
- Killing Nazis is good
  
  Not sure how to break this to you, but he killed far more of his own people than Nazis.
- Not directly. The conman Lysenko, originator of Lysenkoism was. Lysenkoism has nothing particularly to do with socialism/communism. Stalin didn't aim intentionally to create mass starvation in Soviet Russia. Nor did Mao in China, these were issues of understanding science which we taken for granted today but weren't well understood at the time.
  Wikipedia:
  Before the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the archival revelations, some historians estimated that the numbers killed by Stalin's regime were 20 million or higher.[5][6][7] After the Soviet Union dissolved, evidence from the Soviet archives was declassified and researchers were allowed to study it. This contained official records of 799,455 executions (1921–1953),[8][9][10][11][12] around 1.5 to 1.7 million deaths in the Gulag,[13][14][15] some 390,000[16] deaths during the dekulakization forced resettlement, and up to 400,000 deaths of persons deported during the 1940s,[17] with a total of about 3.3 million officially recorded victims in these categories.[18] According to historian Stephen Wheatcroft, approximately 1 million of these deaths were "purposive" while the rest happened through neglect and irresponsibility.[2] The deaths of at least 5.5 to 6.5 million[19] persons in the Soviet famine of 1932–1933 are sometimes included with the victims of the Stalin era.[2][20]
  
  So we're just going to ignore the ~800k executions and the ~1.5M gulag deaths?

...yet.