The US is Israel’s accomplice, not a ceasefire mediator

What you said reminds me of this image from Tricontinental

I see what you’re saying about the headline, but the article is pretty clear: the US pretends to be a neutral party but in reality the US fully supports whatever Israel says they need to do militarily.

saying my hand shoveling food is my mouth's accomplice.

I am this beer's accomplish. No, stop, I'm only a junior partner in this blarbblbkl

(but yes, agree with this)

the United States role in the conflict as "giving cover" or "giving political cover"

There's one more type of "cover" you forgot, Jack.

(holding the mass shooter's gun when he gets tired also you bought the gun for him) "I'm working tirelessly to end this terrible situation!"

oh look, sparkling fascism

Going to lose some internet points for this take, but leftism won't save us.

Cry about your downvotes somewhere else you pissbaby genocide minimizer, when people from Hexbear hate you we'll say it with words.

A problem that remains unsolvable

No and kindly face the wall please.

We don't have downvotes, dipshit. What you're gonna get is explanations why you're wrong as well as the childish name calling you deserve. I'm gonna do the latter, you're a nuance seeking creep who's understanding of the world will always be comparing reality to so.e perfect fiction you've invented in your head. You also dress bad and your house smells weird. Take a fucking hike ya baloney

This is an opinion totally based in ignorance. You should educate yourself.

If a guy is getting waterboarded and spits in the torturer's face, the captive is the belligerent?

You probably would have blamed the Jewish people fighting against the nazis in the Warsaw ghetto too.

It's pretty plan you don't have eyes to see, or you're incredibly dishonest.

Oh piss off, people like you need to be thrown into a fucking pit

a colonialist Arab empire

What century are we living in again? Medieval "colonies" are nothing like industrial-era colonies

The UN upholds Palestinian armed resistance as legitimate and Israeli occupation as illegitimate. To cite a general assembly resolution on the rights of occupied peoples from the early 80s:

Deeply shocked and alarmed at the deplorable consequences of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon and recalling all the relevant resolutions of the Security Council, in particular resolutions 508 (1982) of 5 June 1982, 509 (1982) of 6 June 1982, 520 (1982) of 17 September 1982 and 521 (1982) of 19 September 1982,

1. Calls upon all States to implement fully and faithfully all the resolutions of the United Nations regarding the exercise of the right to self-determination and independence by peoples under colonial and foreign domination;

2. Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for their independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial domination, apartheid and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle;

3. Reaffirms the inalienable right of the Namibian people, the Palestinian people and all peoples under foreign and colonial domination to self-determination, national unity and sovereignty without foreign interference;

4. Strongly condemns those Governments that do not recognize the right to self-determination and independence of all peoples still under colonial domination and alien subjugation, notably the peoples of Africa and the Palestinian people;

The occupation is not "unsolvable". The only reason it's even a problem is because the US has done the math and worked out that they value the geopolitical utility of the continued existence of the (fascist, colonialist, genocidal) Israeli state over the continued existence of the Palestinian people. The solution is to make the occupation too costly (politically or militarily) for the US such that they cease their support and the Israeli state is allowed to be destroyed.

You're right, leftism won't save us, if by us you mean people like you. Consider embracing that and making the world better off

October 7th was actually a preemptive strike against the American-backed Israeli regime. The concept that this conflict is just "too complicated" is Knesset propaganda, and the genocidal actions of its troops on the ground must be justified to a western audience through browbeating and misinformation. Truly, the apartheid regime that occupies Palestine is where personal morals for liberals go to die.

the heinous action of terrorists have to be justified

You must be mistaken. Nobody here is justifying the IOF.

A problem that remains unsolvable because of everyone's refusal to abandon their own ideological biases.

I dunno, I think these people are solving this problem pretty well.

The heinous acts of terrorists Justified and moral resistance action

Sure there are ideological biases, but it is a conflict perpetuated for material interests regardless of ideology. Quoting CommieJones:

isisrael is a research and development arm of the capitalist anglo-westoid's colonial, white supremacist, fascist, military industrial complex. It is a long term social/geopolitical/military experiment to test the viability of a fascist-colonial settler state.

There have been plenty of ideological conflicts that weren't ongoing for decades, this conflict is stuck because of the financial and political benefits that the wealthy in related industries gain from it.

I want you to hold Uranium for 12-16 hours

A problem that remains unsolvable because of everyone's refusal to abandon their own ideological biases.

If only people could become less polarized they would be perfect little centrists like me, not a single ideology rattling around my skull. No biases here, no siree.

So the region just devolves into two groups slaughtering each other

It's just tribalism and religion, no need to look at who colonized who, land ownership is just vibes after all (except when it's ordained by God or the British), a six year old Gazan kid who gets pasted onto a wall by a 500 pound bomb is just as bad as the guy dropping said bomb