arakhis_ @ arakhis_ @feddit.org

!fedigrow@lemm.ee - let's get small communities to thrive on a sillicon val

---

Read more

Posts

20

Comments

225

Joined

3 wk. ago

Ich habe mich noch nie so ernsthaft 3 mal hinterfragt ob das satire ist oder nicht

Ehrlich gesagt isses mir auch jetzt egal wenn das echt is, hab eh kein soziales Netz mit relevanter Moral mehr

but emulators are perfectly legal?

Of course I would buy the game officially

nice but these tutorials seem to be about jailbreaking consoles not emulation, or am I wrong?

pause buttons is all its about. emissions wont stop after energy generation is zero-emission. it just will be slower by a chunk (like 60%ish)

people will still breed cows/not turn vegan (up to 75% of total 20%ghg emissions) and mobility will also remain (lets just say by half without derailing too much - so half of total 20%ghg emissions)

Also theres studies on how we are kinda jet lagging in resulted heating and on how recordings of right before pre-industrial era levels also could be different, lower in total and therefore more extreme heating affecting tipping points.

so a pause like that would be great - because all we have left is time and smart people (although kinda marginalized nowadays and I dont really believe in the success of that in short term) we have crossed 1,5° and therefore are in tipping point cascade (which is irreversable) territory.

Früher oder später wird das unausweichlich in einem föderalistischen fediverse-System, oder nicht?

Also klar gerne nehm ich den c/Deutschland crosspost herunter. Wenn das die Mods und die Mehrheit der Stimmen sagen.

Wäre hier echt gern an deiner Meinung interessiert wie das mit Nutzerzahlen wie bei Reddit ablaufen würde. Nur um ein Bsp einzuwerfen: Was ist wenn eine Community die Regeln der etablierten so gar nicht Toleriert oder ein riesen Drama war, die große aber immernoch etabliert bleibt. Dann wird der Post doch auch unausweichlich doppelt im Feed erscheinen, nicht?

EDIT: Ich möchte möglichst viele Lemmy'ianer erreichen und Diskussionsraum schaffen für Themen in denen ich interessiert bin oder auch einfach den Feed kreieren, um genauso up-to-date zu sein auf die weise wie man es auf r/de ist. Zumindest in den Themen die ich so gewichte

which means its ok for you. I cant follow

yes lol. I also have a 4070ti though

EDIT: I have no clue where this could be a relevant argument

also - why is ublock for example not anonymous enough? doesnt it provide anything??

Like Id love to be able to see the full picture on this matter and weight at least all major arguments. like, is the distincion here the one tries to block corporations within their legally bound operations and the other(tor) tries to make everyone, even "hackers" unable to see what IP I have?

Im quite lacking in knowledge on this topic

Yes but no. I see the issue in terms of late stage capitalism too - but I think in a sibling comment this discussion already happened.

Id just love to see more corporations being like Mondragon(spanish) in the top ranks (i.e. stock corpos) but I would not want governments specifically to gain ownership forcefully.

So I'd call it regulated capitalism - as you said, just not paleo libertarian laissez-faire as we clearly see how that doesnt work once all markets are established (and even the competition phase was, as we all should know, pretty questionable historically cough imperialism cough)

Am I the only one thinking that a huge chunk of the initial audience are Nintendo adults who already have a pc for main games and a switch on the side?

Feels like this gimmick (although every new Nintendo console gets one) was so forced just to upsell a switch 1 and justify splitting the community with exclusive releases. Really sad to see mk world not playable with a player base on switch 1. Most next gen were happily bought enough with a reasoning in increasing hardware (which the switch 2 really also does well).

Just the predatory move of splitting or even passively force the playerbase to leave behind the switch 1, makes the mouse sensor so MEH.. I mean.. lackluster in my eyes. Idk

I'd find it more impactful to make the science paper the main focus (the link). Not some biased Blog – which ofc can be very helpful to initially spark your interest in topics you haven't heard yet

But we have very strong evidence of this in scientific consensus, a peer reviewed meta analysis: Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers by J. Poore, T. Nemecek et al.

(off topic: newer study on ghg bound to nutritional value of items )

Personal no paywall Upload by Poore on his website found here

And processed data visualized well on i.e. Ourworldindata

If you feel lost in any way with these sources, look for imagery figures, they often contain the resulting messages. (but without helping you understand how the results are to be weighted in relevancy due ie data collection methods and choices)

Change in reality is not a switch in a day.

It's a long process, and so a slow decline in demand. If demand for the unethical product would be flipped with the ethical one like the opposite of what we have now, the practice would effectively be irrelevant and since it's only alive due subsidies likely also very unprofitable – therefore 'bought away' unlike the title claims

It's a demand issue. And that's an issue because lack of education for example (at least in my eyes), education about epistemology, logic, moral and empathy

We as individuals are NOT responsible for what consequences other demands bring, this angle feels like taking the burden of the collective world onto one self. But that is not the case

I too wonder if there would be communities, focused on playing these xbox360 era games on pc - after this

Anyone got links further educational reading on this matter?

I wonder if there would be communities, focused on playing these xbox360 era games on pc - after this

Anyone got links further educational reading on this matter?

So "how" is there no regulation solution – my initial statement in question

Now also actually discuss. Would love to know "how" I'm wrong

600 includes the console. The point was missed

to you, the 9 other likers and the one disliker:

I'd argue "under unregulated capitalism" and would love to hear how Im wrong here: When you buy an apple from a farmer in EU thats local to your small town, I'd say thats pretty ethical? Isnt it??!

"just zoom out bro".. trust me theres no reasoning left when it comes to habit and culture preservation here.. I studied renewable energy engineering for multiple years