Amazon is upgrading its decade-old Alexa voice assistant with generative AI and plans to charge a monthly subscription fee to offset the cost of the technology.
Amazon is upgrading its decade-old Alexa voice assistant with generative AI and plans to charge a monthly subscription fee to offset the cost of the technology.
If there was any reason to believe they wouldn't be selling data anyways, making it a paid thing would make it seem more trustworthy, at least. If it's free, then you have to assume it's generating profit through other means.
Though even if that means of profit is from people using it to make Amazon orders, I still don't trust it because most of the time when I do order something on Amazon, I need to look through a bunch of sketchy results to find one that looks trustworthy. I wouldn't trust a voice assistant to pick a better option, in fact I wouldn't be surprised if the voice assistant is specifically designed to select inventory they have more trouble moving.
I wonder if 'basic' Alexa will stay. At home we find it genuinely useful for setting timers and alarms etc. my wife has an obsession with the weather and is always asking for weather info for our area - she doesn't drive and works in an office so it's beyond me.
We have Samsung phones so could resort to Bixby.
The only other thing we use Alexa for is playing music although my Sonos system has it's own voice control for that, although I suspect that may go in a couple of years when they stop supporting my kit, it's five years old now.
If I remember correctly, that turned out to not work since people apparently don't like ordering via voice interface. Doing it via an app or website tends to be faster and more convenient.