Trump Posts -- Then Deletes -- Rant About Stormy Daniels Testifying
Trump Posts -- Then Deletes -- Rant About Stormy Daniels Testifying
Donald Trump posted, then deleted, a rant about adult film star Stormy Daniels testifying in his criminal hush-money trial.
11th violation of gag order : lock him up.
No, it's okay. He deleted it and nobody saw it. Absolutely nobody. Any rumors otherwise are just that, rumors.
He's not getting locked up. I doubt he'll even be sentenced to any time in a cell even if he's found guilty. He's not even going to get probation. He's going to completely show that the Justice system once again is not equal and fair but not for the reasons he will continue to whine about.
What, real consequences for deliberately and publicly ignoring yet another court order? You must be imagining if one of us was a defendant.
I don't know what they'll do to him, but I can tell you: if you were to do what he did, the twelfth time, there'd surely be some sort of stern admonishment, or maybe even real consequences!
She detailed having met Trump at a golf tournament in 2006, when she was 27 years old and — as she tells it — Trump was already older than her father.
I'm sorry to be pedantic, but wasn't he always older than her father? Like, that's how age works.
You should absolutely be pedantic about a paid, published article having writing like that. It’s not some random internet comment from someone who may or may not have graduated high school, this was approved by multiple people who allegedly went to college for the writing related jobs they have. It should at least pass the “does this make sense if you think about it at all for more than 5 seconds” test.
And yeah I know reporters and writers facing the same overwork/underpay squeeze as everyone else. This is more about the corporations that run these papers and magazines being responsible for things deteriorating to this point.
I used to be older than my little brother.
I still am, but I used to, too.
I’m a simple man, I see Mitch Hedberg, I upvote Mitch Hedberg.
Well done. 👏🏻
Could be older then...Than her father is now... But who knows.
That's how i interpreted it too. Still odd
Maybe they meant "already older then than her father's current age?" They probably didn't, and I'm too lazy to fact check that, but agreed, what a weird comment to add to the article
The former president seemingly remembered that violating his gag order by commenting on witnesses could land him in jail
Oh, he remembered. He just thinks he's playing 4D chess by tweeting then deleting because "it doesn't count."
I really don't think he can retain anything he finds boring for more then 5 minutes. He's not playing imagery 4D chess. He really is that stupid.
Maybe he pulled it back to proofread for spelling, grammar and clarity
Or to fact check it. He doesn't seem like the type to jump the gun
Ladies and gentlemen, let me tell you something. Tremendous things, really. So, I tweeted something, and people are saying, “Donald, what’s going on with that tweet?” And I said, “Look, folks, it was a tremendous tweet, the best tweet, believe me.” But then, I thought, maybe it was too tremendous. Maybe it was too powerful. So, I deleted it. And people are saying, “Wow, that’s leadership.” And they’re right. Because I’m a leader, and leaders lead.
He wouldn't want a repeat of the embarrassing 'hamberder' incident, which haunts him to this day.
Only the best covfefe
Audibly chuckled
Bet he didnt delete it
Dumbfuck has never heard the term 'surprise witness.' And this one wasn't even a surprise. Of course she testified.
Now he’s threatening me with JAIL, & THEY HAVE NO CASE
I thought this shithead was ready to go to jail for
speaking his mindcommitting multiple contempts of court. I guess that's not the case when it's not him talking.Merchan ruled as court began that Daniels can testify about her alleged sexual encounter with Trump and “how she felt about it,” but that he didn’t want to hear any of the nitty-gritty regarding the alleged affair with Daniels. We don’t need to know the details of intercourse,” Merchan said. Prosecutors assured the court that Daniels would not be describing “genitalia” in her testimony, ensuring the jury would not be subjected to another mushroom-comparison session.
Anyone else notice the closing parentheses but no opening paren? Again, I'm sick of not having proper copy-editors in journalism!
Look, I'm just gonna say what no one else is brave enough to say: he's awesome, let's elect him again, it's ok when he breaks the law. Fucking pig.
He deleted it therefor not contempt of court.
Meaning he posted it.
He mentally declassified the post, so it wasn't against the law. /s
How much does it cost to dang Stormy?
What did it cost Trump? Something like $480,000 that he funneled as part of the cover up. Not sure if you want to factor in his current legal fees as part of the cost as well. I'm sure it's well into the multi-millions by now. You probably couldn't afford it.
Fun fact, danging something is using thread to repair holes in a garment. Thus to 'dang Stormy' means to close one of her holes (which could have multiple meanings)