Google’s self-designed office swallows Wi-Fi “like the Bermuda Triangle”
Google’s self-designed office swallows Wi-Fi “like the Bermuda Triangle”
arstechnica.com
Google’s self-designed office swallows Wi-Fi “like the Bermuda Triangle”
55 comments
-
-
"Why hasn't anyone designed a building like this before?"
"Oh."
-
At launch, Google's VP of Real Estate & Workplace Services, David Radcliffe, said the site "marks the first time we developed one of our own major campuses, and the process gave us the chance to rethink the very idea of an office." The result is a wild tent-like structure with a striking roofline made up of swooping square sections.
In other words, they erected themselves a circus tent. Ironic.
-
Hilarious in a way...
Of course Google would have problems with the very foundation of a technology needed for business when choosing to design the building themselves.
Like, they couldn't consult with a professional.
Seems very... on brand for Google now.
-
I kept reading it as Daniel Radcliffe and I was like why the HECK is he working there?
-
-
"You know what would be totally sick? What if we made our building's roof into a matrix of inverted metal parabolas?"
-
Sometimes it becomes clear a company is trying to do too much when these problems manifest.
-
I appreciate that the "Gradient Canopy" roof is covered in solar cells and collects rainwater while also letting in natural light, so maybe the problem is they didn't do enough by not adding in some shielding, too.
-
That is really really cool
-
-
-
Sounds like bad WiFi design not building design.
-
I could imagine that those concave metal roof sheets reflect the electromagnetic waves all over the place, causing tons of interference...
-
Yeah, whoever designed radio waves wasn't thinking about the potential for creative architecture!
-
To put it more descriptively, when you do industrial scale WiFi, you're supposed to design out the network during the blueprint stage, then go through with a signal analyzer to map out the radio properties when it's time to install the telecom
You can put an access point in every room or every 30 feet, and tune them to work seamlessly without interference. You can do the same with cell signals too. They even make cables that are also the antenna - they're cut with gaps in the shielding, so you can get perfect coverage inside an iron maze if you wanted to
It's all just a matter of cost... It's not cheap, but a few million dollars is just a line item at that scale
-
-
This doesn’t sound like a serious problem for a company like Google. They can afford to solve it by brute force — just put a Wi-Fi hotspot in every single room.
-
Which is also what you want really, if you have everything on WiFi. High density setups with really small cells so you can reuse channels. A building with high signal attenuation helps with that.
Having said that I'd never want to work for a company like Google.
PS:
Bad radio propagation means Googlers are making do with Ethernet cables, phone hotspots.
"Making do with Ethernet cables"? For me that's still the most reliable and secure way of doing networking on computers. You're at a desk, why not have a cable there. For mobile devices, sure. At my work every docking station has a cabled connection luckily.
-
But if they spend millions on WiFi hotspots then how they can pay the dividends to the shareholders? If you listen to them the company is barely profitable and more cuts are needed
-
I'm not even sure that would be a bad solution for us. Can something like a Raspberry Pi work as a hotspot?
I wonder what exactly it is that's messing with the signal.
-
My house was built in 1967. It's a solid house. The walls are plaster and they have chicken wire in them. WiFi is a nightmare. I ended up running a few hard lines and using a mesh system.
-
Any computer with a network port and a wifi adapter can be turned into a wifi access point.
But there are cheaper and better alternatives than a raspberry pi
-
-
-
Why the hell is a professional tech business not relying almost-exclusively in ethernet, anyway?
-
Because if you walk to a meeting room with your laptop, you don’t want to plug it in every time.
Also phones and tablets are a thing.
-
-
Because WiFi speeds have increased to the point where they rival wired connections, and most people use laptops which make wireless more convenient.
Wired nowadays only makes sense if you need to move massive amounts of data, want to use PoE, ...or are in a high interference area. Kind of ironic they'd design a building that makes it the latter.
-
Aggregate bandwidth now rivals or slightly exceeds gigabit wired connections.
Where that aggregate bandwidth is shared amongst large numbers of users, bandwidth per user can suffer dramatically.
Low density areas may be fine, but cube farms are an issue especially when staff are doing data intensive or latency sensitive tasks.
If you're giving employees docking stations for their laptops, running ethernet to those docking stations is a no-brainer.
Moving most of the traffic to wired connections frees up spectrum/bandwidth for situations that do need to be wireless.
-
-
-
I would think the metal parts of roof might be reflecting signals all around the building, which would cause interference between devices. (there is a limited number of WiFi channels), it might work better with a plastic roof, or one with RF absorbers.
-
Multiple paths to the same device is one of the ways MIMO allows for faster WiFi. If the WiFi setup has been tweaked for the environment, this doesn't need to be a problem.
Google suggesting using phones as hotspots makes the interference suggestion more unlikely, I think. I suspect they just haven't done a good job at setting up their access points, which can be a challenge for large buildings (but shouldn't be a problem for a company like Google with their own in-house WiFi engineers).
Then again, this being Google, the team that designed the WiFi setup was probably shut down a month after they finished installing hardware and before they could make the software usable.
-
-
I don't think the roof would be good at reflecting signals back at the device, it scatters them all throughout the building, rasing the noise floor. In a way, phone hotspots can cause less interference then a proper access point because they use a lower transmit power, and allow the other devices to reduce power.
-
-
-
Why didn't they send an email to their facilities? How are we supposed to care?
-
🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles: ::: spoiler Click here to see the summary Reuters reports that Google's first self-designed office building has "been plagued for months by inoperable or, at best, spotty Wi-Fi, according to six people familiar with the matter."
At launch, Google's VP of Real Estate & Workplace Services, David Radcliffe, said the site "marks the first time we developed one of our own major campuses, and the process gave us the chance to rethink the very idea of an office."
The roof is covered in solar cells and collects rainwater while also letting in natural light, and Google calls it the "Gradient Canopy."
All those peaks and parabolic ceiling sections apparently aren't great for Wi-Fi propagation, with the Reuters report saying that the roof "swallows broadband like the Bermuda Triangle."
Googlers assigned to the building are making do with Ethernet cables, using phones as hotspots, or working outside, where the Wi-Fi is stronger.
A Google spokesperson told Reuters the company has already made several improvements and hopes to have a fix in the coming weeks.
Saved 45% of original text. :::
-
All this tells me is that ancient Chinese evil spirits were made of wifi.
55 comments
Is this going to be the first building on KilledByGoogle.com?