Chinese communism is just capitalism but the taxes are for human welfare. How accurate is this statement?
Chinese communism is just capitalism but the taxes are for human welfare. How accurate is this statement?
Chinese communism is just capitalism but the taxes are for human welfare. How accurate is this statement?
Would you like an essay from prolewiki?
Tl;dr: it doesn't capture the full essence of China's economy by simply calling its economy a state-capitalist or such mode of production. (unlike what others like Vidiwell might imply)
There are many major factors to take into account, such as:
Land ownership
State planning
State owned enterprises, as the commanding heights of the economy
State guided investment funds
Cooperatives
CPC ran banks and CPC bond markets
Party-commitee involvement
Extra-legal control rights (recuperation/co-option of private enterprise into the relatively more socialist framework)
Social credit score et anti-{private} monopoly laws in regulating market sector
can we not outsource ideological debates to AI
Slop robot with Chinese characteristics
There is something very trying about coming to non-mainstream forum to ask other human beings a question and getting a copy-pasted computer-generated response
welcome to web 4.0 I guess
not much of a debate on this one, guess I could drop some links to redsails next time tho
next person to answer a human question with ai slop gets blocked
How accurate? It's not correct, if that's what you mean. I've been compelled by the argument that it's state capitalist as defined by lenin with regards to the stages of communist development, though
I would argue it's state socialism still because there's a clear path to everything becoming state owned, but they're playing the market to get global trade a capital up. As they build their economy. Quite brilliant if you're thinking about hundreds and thousands of years into the future while still building the best situation for Chinese people today.
nah, even by deng's own requirement China has restored capitalism. He wanted capitalism restrained to foreign investment and for the public/collective sector at 90 percent of the economy, without a development of large domestic capitalism. China post deng liberalized extremely hard which has only been put to a halt by Xi. By literally any Communist definition, even by the one who started 'reform and opening up', China does not have a socialist economy, but a state capitalist or even just capitalist one. The problem is the governing structure is explicitly socialist, and governed by a communist party (although some areas are not very devoted to communism at all, and want to restore capitalism like the Shanghai clique). But still, this is at most state capitalist as the base of all things under marxist analysis is the economy.
Its hard to say they are or aren't building socialism because i see them at a crossroads. They can increase socialist reforms or increase capitalist ones. Socialist restoration is possible but needs some strong movements to get rid of the groups who restored capitalism in the first place.
The second centenerary goal of developing a modern socialist country in all respects isn't until 2049.
I personally think China is socialist for the record
So what suckdems pinky-promise but never deliver? Sounds like a big improvement
an improvement, to be sure, but state capitalism at most
State capitalism that ended homelessness and lifted 850M out of poverty and is currently on track to outperform every society in history on quality of life scales while simultaneously doing it with less waste per capita AND producing enough green tech to be the exporter of choice for the entire world.
You might say "state capitalism at most" as though it's a low form of development but it's literally the most advanced and successful form of social organization in the history of humanity. It is the leading edge of socialist experimentation.
It’s not capitalism, nor is it socialism in the traditional sense.
It’s socialism with Chinese characteristics. This is the key qualifier. It’s kinda its own thing.