Great Satan politicians are not human example #666
Great Satan politicians are not human example #666
Great Satan politicians are not human example #666
Wherever i read the blueMAGA excuses there is one that surfaces very often and is very specific: Trump said that capital of Israel is Jerusalem.
Dems are really taking all of what Trump said and did and are doing worse, point after point.
The platform was "unveiled" this Sunday, but it has 20 mentions of what will happen in Biden's "second term."
https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/FINAL-MASTER-PLATFORM.pdf
this is deeply embarrasing but I doubt there will even be as much as a reprimanded intern over it
This is why Biden thought he could hang on for so long - they can 25th Amendment him, but there's no mechanism to oust his parliamentarians on the platform committee.
So the Harris campaign has committed to Biden’s strategy of “No I promise, I am the greater evil, I will do more evil than Trump and I can do it better, please vote for my evil”
Good to have their official policy positions that I can turn to when people act surprised that I don't support any of the shit that they represent.
This is why I love when people still argue about who's more "accelerationist" - you're getting WW3 one way or the other.
Before you quote this tweet it doesn't actually say most of that stuff, except that BDS is discriminatory. It does however continue the Iran nuclear weapons myth, bringing back old classics
Hilarious that they're calling Trump pulling out of the deal a "costly mistake" but don't mention that Biden's only offer to Iran was the same deal with even more restrictions and limitations on Iran. Iran would likelyhave returned to the original deal but Biden's own costly mistake of slapping Iran in the face with more restrictions to get back to a deal Iran didn't break means there's still no fuckin deal
When you're talking to sympathetic-but-skeptical libs (and many of us were there once), it's far better to understate your claims than overstate them. You don't want to get bogged down on debatable shit; keep the conversation on topics where there isn't any defense.
Lesser evil everyone
Genuinely this has me convinced again that the Dems are the greater evil, not the lesser one
“Trump should’ve gone to war with Iran” is not a good selling point
Sounds like a little someone wants Donald Trump elected. Do you get your information from Dussia or Hamas?
...Joe Biden?
Wait you mean the tweet OP, leaving this up because Joe Biden reading Mao in a Furry RP is a very funny image.
so does it actually say this stuff or is this a gross exaggeration being repeated uncritically?
(gross exaggeration?? in my hexbear?? it's more likely than you think)
Nah, as pointed out elsewhere, this is exaggerated. The doc definitely thinks we should have been much harder on Iran, Yemen, and Lebanon, but doesn't outline going to war with them, just the usual vague garbage of 'Trump needed to be rougher with them'.
It is right that the doc calls BDS discriminatory, and it is also critical of the UN, but not to the point of underscoring it as evil
Poorly proofread garbage that still presupposes Biden getting a second term, and your usual neoliberal slop with some notable new (for them) nastiness ('border security','uncritical support for Israel to defend itself', etc), though I suppose uncritical support for Israel is not new.
I think that's really not the most pertinent part of what is communicated here
should "of"
huge pet peeve of mine
scientist man disagrees with you: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23739744
i'm not paying to read some bullshit on why someone thinks 'of' makes sense in place of 'have'
Some of my fav bits from this 92 page pile of donkey turds
From page 62; weren't we talking about how inhumane this was?
LMAO
From page 63, guess not, fuck them kids (in cages). I could pull more from their immigration section, but it's just pissing me off.
From page 82
Holy shit, they really do attack Trump for not doing enough about Iran lmao
From page 83
Page 84 actually pisses me off more than the immigration section.
Also, I get 12 matches for "in his second term" referring to Biden's (presumptive) second term, are these idiots aware of who their nominee is? I'm supposed to take this clown shoes party seriously when they can't even fucking proofread their own officially released documents?
Page 49.
This happened under the Democrats! You people let this happen!
"Sorry sweety, the non-democratically appointed body of 9 justices that have self-appointed power said we have to get rid of it, nothing we can do"
Are you fucking kidding me? Your argument for why to vote for you is “Trump didn’t go to war with Iran”???
Are you campaigning for Trump? If you wanted me to vote for Trump as the lesser of two evils this is how you make that argument holy fucking shit
But who will think of poor blue dog
and his desire to turn Iran into a craterNo-no, they are accelerationists who think that war against Iran would greatly speed up the decline of American Empire!
yeah those errors are pretty damning proof to show Harris' campaign will not deviate from biden's. This makes it abundantly clear they took from a document that existed before Biden stepped down and simply changed the names.
Even though its damning, it'll just serve as proof to people who already knew harris wouldn't be different that they were right, cuz it still wouldnt convince a lib who doesn't wanna know.
When they say "his second term" they mean netanyahu not biden
isn't Netanyahu on like his 5th term now?