TERF island “evolutionary biologists” trying not to do RATIONAL phrenology in 2024. Challenge level:

I want to civilly hit him in the face with a brick. Dumb shithead set back my mission to kill god by years with his Islamaphobic dipshittery.

It's a simple, biological fact and reality that Richard Dawkins is meant to be hit in the face with a brick
source: same ass richard dawkins pulled his transphobic "facts" from
- (undisputed)
- He's evolved a brick hittable face as a defensive method against being British. It's his evolutionary niche. The selfish brick prick.

The most civil thing to do is to introduce him to baseball

The propaganda is insane...there is ZERO proof she's got that genetic makeup. It's literally just disinformation.

(undisputed)
- Richard Dawkins, fascist (undisputed)
- undisputed [1]
  [1]

I stopped paying attention a long time ago. But I'm shocked that Richard Dawkins would have an opinion this bad. I'm also shocked that FB gives a fuck about transphobia now.

This was always going to be Richard Dawkins’ path. Over the past few years he’s really leaned into it though and now he knows where to get
for his toast.
A few months ago Dawkins was calling himself “culturally Christian” to show that he was against the Ramadamification of Christmas in Br*tain.
It was never about atheism, science, rationality, or enlightenment values. It was about otherizing non-white (edit: and non-cis people) people in Europe and “The West.” It’s why the new atheists got popular after 9/11 and why nobody blinked when people like Sam Harris were going around calling for nuclear first strikes against “the Muslim world.”
- In hindsight it's pretty obviously a movement to divorce white supremacy from anti intellectualism
- A few months ago Dawkins was calling himself “culturally Christian”
  Hitchens was doing that over ten years ago lol

New Atheists not being insanely reactionary challenge (IMPOSSIBLE)

Just stick with old atheism
- Make Atheism Communist Again
- Every time someone says "the New Atheists were right and I miss them
  People say that?!?!?! I think my head would explode if i heard that

Richard Dawkins read Imane Khalif’s genome sequencing analysis out of a hat that he swears exists and is true but none of us are allowed to see it because God would be mad about it.

Richard DawKKKin$ Mormon arc
- Wouldn't be surprised if he were a closeted Western Christian
Congrats on the site tagline!
- Ngl I was happy with this one. Glad it had some legs.

Imagine having a PhD from Oxford in biology and still getting basic biology wrong.

sounds like the biology program at oxford is garbage

Best emoji on the site so far

Richard Dawkins is genetically female (XX undisputed)

Genetically Neanderthal authors such as Richard Dawkins (crakkker undisputed) should not have civilized arguments with humans on Facebook.

Somehow this sounds no more stupid than what he wrote.

He thinks like he gets punched in the face for a living.

It's crazy that Mike Tyson seems like a nicer person than Richard Dawkins nowadays
- CW: SA

Lol did he just call a Facebook post a tweet

Huge "I got my son the new Nintendo
" vibes
- Counterpoint: all soda is Coke

I love his PFP. He's getting photobombed by a bush. It's such a conspicuous and cynical affectation.

Dawkins is such a fucking dork. At least when he was just a loud atheist, it was funny watching Christians clutch pearls but this "only 2 genders" era of him is just fucking cringe.

If he'd just shut up, he could have been the guy who coined the term "meme" and been remembered as a relatively successful minor celebrity debate-bro.
- I think this a lot about of celebs that don't know how to shut up. Like, Rowling could have made Harry Potter, raked in millions and then disapppeared into obscurity instead of becoming Twitter's transphobia poster child.
been cringe since his dear muslima shit
- Yeah that was some ignorant shit too.

a

on EVERY elevatorgator!

Every time I watch Rebecca Watson I can't stop thinking that "she got Richard Dawkins to blow a gasket by complaining about harassment"

Rigid species boundaries are nonsense but rigid sexual boundaries are so real!! What about the actual complexities of chromosomes?? Anything that refutes my position is a disorder and therefore doesn’t count!! Why? Because it doesn’t fit my position!!