France makes abortion a constitutional right

Thanks for posting the single article which does not say "France is the first country to enshrine abortion rights in its constitution." It's not. Yugoslavia was. In 1974.

man, fuck Slobodan Milosevic
- And Tuđman and Izetbegović

The US could've done the same, and yet...

You know what? It's BECAUSE of the US that we, French, have this now.
- The US has become a cautionary tale for:
  • Refusing Universal Healthcare
  • Opposing Racial and Cultural Equity
  • Revoking Women’s Bodily Autonomy
  • Expanding Excessive Incarceration
  • Exonerating Police Violence
  • Dismissing Effective Gun Control
  • Ignoring Mass Shootings
  • Denying Veteran and First Responder Care
  • Allowing Environmental Toxins
  • Approving Carcinogens in Food
  • Condoning High Infant Mortality
  • Eradicating LGTBQ+ Rights
  • Encouraging Religion in Government
  • Dismantling Social Services
  • Rejecting Living Wage, Retirement, and Pension Issues
  • Persecuting the Low-income and Homeless
  • Promoting the Purchase of Politicians and Judges
- Every story needs a villain.
- You're welcome
How? No way 75% of the states would agree.
An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose. The amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the State legislatures, or three-fourths of conventions called in each State for ratification.
- How? No way 75% of the states would agree.
  By electing sane politicians and not a bunch of weak populists who bend for the loudest rightwingnuts...
- Just gotta have another civil war of course. EZ.
- And that’s one of the major problems with America.
- When Dems had the supermajority during the first part of Obama’s term, Roe could have easily been codified into law. They slept on this at the time, saying there were “other priorities.”
  So, while this doesn’t require a constitutional amendment to become the law of the land, with how incredibly dysfunctional Congress has become, it may be the case that Article V conventions are the only way to change the laws to suit the needs of the public over the desires of the elites.
To add an amendment to the US Constitution, it needs a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, followed by ratification by three-fourths of the states.
L O L O L
And yet. There was absolutely no way the US had the huge support needed to change its constitution.
66% approval from 66% of states I think. Atm the us could not get that many to agree on anything. Including a right to air.
- And what, let people who don’t deserve air get the air? I’m always going to get air, they told me that. I deserve the air. So why should other people get my air? Fuck em, they shouldn’t get any air.
What? Where were they anywhere close to that?

Yeah, well, we put "You can't be president if you lead an insurrection" into our constitution, so I just hope France holds the line better than the US did.

Keep in mind that it's not the right to abortion that has been added to the constitution. It's the freedom to abort for women. Massive difference. It doesn't guarantee access to abortion, it says nothing about the delay to get an abortion and it leaves out trans men. Still a victory, but with pretty big nuances.

Constitutionally, it means that they're to be given the freedom to abort. Which means that if it's their choice, the state has to provide the means. Interestingly, it also means that a doctor claiming exemption because it's legally allowed c1n fuck off because the constitution is the first law.
(So, yeah, what you said but backwards)
- This is not true, a doctor still has the right to refuse to perform an abortion but has the obligation to redirect to another practitioner who would perform it. Just like today
Right and freedom are similar. Even the conseil ~~constitutionnel~~ d'Etat confirmed it. So no, it's not a massive difference but a trick added by a senator to delay and create doubt on the law. https://piaille.fr/@malauss/112045942102612011

News about France and most of the comments are Americans complaining xD

France become the first country to explicitly include the right to terminate a pregnancy in its constitution.

No, Yugoslavia did it in the 70s.

That's not a real country.
- Not anymore but it was until the 90s

China has had affordable, over-the-counter abortion pills since the 1970s. Kind of wild when you hear stories of people in the west who aren't guaranteed this, and haveto argue back-and-forth with their doctor and insurance on justifying it and getting it covered.

But not all support it, with the Vatican repeating its opposition to abortion. "There can be no 'right' to take a human life," the Vatican institution said in a statement, echoing concerns already raised by French Catholic bishops. It appealed to "all governments and all religious traditions to do their best so that, in this phase of history, the protection of life becomes an absolute priority".

“There can be no ‘right’ to take a human life,”
Wasn't so long ago that the Vatican had a very different take on that, or maybe it's different after said "life" leaves the womb?

France masterfully trolling Third World countries.

And retroactive...

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Abortion has been legal in France since 1975, but polls show around 85% of the public supported amending the constitution to protect the right to end a pregnancy.

Before the vote, Prime Minister Gabriel Attal told parliament that the right to abortion remained "in danger" and "at the mercy of decision makers".

While resistance from right-wingers in parliament failed to materialise, President Macron has been accused of using the constitution for electoral ends.

In a 2001 ruling, the council based its approval of abortion on the notion of liberty enshrined in the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man, which is technically part of the constitution.

And so nothing authorised us to think that France was exempt from this risk," said Laura Slimani, from the Fondation des Femmes rights group.

"There can be no 'right' to take a human life," the Vatican institution said in a statement, echoing concerns already raised by French Catholic bishops.

The original article contains 515 words, the summary contains 155 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

Great....we Americans will now be required to have a special travel visa that requires a pregnancy test... pregnant? No travel for you! Specially France!

Thanks Republicans! So smart! Like a really smooth rock!

With the large Muslim population it's a good thing

Cool but too specific. How about the right to bodily autonomy? This includes abortion, assisted suicide, drug use, tattoos, piercings, plastic surgery, and gender reassignment.

Ever heard about babysteps? Don't let perfect be the enemy of better.
- This progress isn't progressive enough!

From what i read:

"We're sending a message to all women: your body belongs to you and no one can decide for you," he added."

Your body... well seems like a abortion is not about "your body" but a body from someone else's...

This world is crazy sometimes 😕

Nobody has the right to live inside your body except yourself.
It's certainly not about your body, that's for damn sure.