But, the children! We need to protect the children!
But, the children! We need to protect the children!
But, the children! We need to protect the children!
I think you misunderstand. We protect single cells and blastomeres. Once they're out, our job is done.
oh please. we also protect genocidal countries.
The only "children" they care about "protecting" is tiny clumps of cells
Indeed. So many examples of them not giving a shit otherwise.
Am I reading the date correctly? This is from 2016, right? Not that the current outrage is not justified, but it took a while to get there.
Given the MAGAt's current obsession with drag queens and trans women using women's washrooms and locker rooms, it's right up to date.
Somehow we have to get ahold of media. Being waterboarded with information until nothing moves the needle like back in the days of watchpeopledie - and if you go far back enough Faces of Death - is almost nostalgic. At least you were sure it happened. Now of you share a video of Palestinians getting strafed while they wait in line for food half the replies say it's fake and the other half empathize with emojis.
That's an oversimplification but fuck me, when people are bring brutalized in real time and algorithms are blocking shares because you have you say unalived so you don't upset people about the livestreamed genocide they are watching it's time to rein in the tech and ramp up the humanity
The same Republicans who think adolescent legal marriage age is fine just as it is? Those Republicans?
It really sucks, hypocrisy and can't be held to the same standards.
Imagine if so and so said or done anything trump has.
Now come on, we know Trump doesn't wear a wig.
We know this because he viscously beat and raped his first wife after having a scalp reduction surgery which he found painful.
Yeah they aren't doing much to protect them.
protect? they are actively grooming and throwing them in the meat grinder
"But what if...I were to put on a wig and pretend to be a woman so I can watch women in the restroom even though there are stalls and I wouldn't be able to see anything? Oh ho ho ho ho, delightfully devilish, Seymour!"
The only way we get the bad sex offender with a boner is by using a good sex offender with a boner
They know, but they don’t care because it’s not actually about that for them. It’s just business.
Not a wig but we do have the first president/vice president team that wears makeup
They are far from the first. Any president or vice president that has appeared on television has worn makeup.
Obviously but those two wear it day to day
I thought they all did it.
He's such a pervert.
Says he'd date his daughter if she wasnt his daughter
Marries a woman who does soft porn shoots
Rapes a child and then the case 'disappears'
Gets charged for sexual assault and then slanders the woman who won the case. Ordered to pay her over 80 million in damages which of course he wont
Sexually assaulted a woman who was trying out for the Apprentice
Says 'you can grab them by the pussy'
His first wife accused him of rape during their divorce proceedings
TWENTY FIVE women have publicly accused him of sexual assault. One or two could be a conspiracy but 25?!!
This perverted asshole should be behind bars NOT pretending to be king of America.
To be clear, there's nothing wrong with marrying a woman who does soft porn. It's only worth mentioning in the context of the rest of the stuff.
To me, it's only "worth" mentioning in the context of political hypocrisy.
Outside of that, I don't like it being demonized either.
It's worth mentioning not because it's objectionable, but because how he sees it is objectionable.
In your humble opinion, sure. I know a lot of guys who wouldn't date a porn 'star' because they usually have other issues that make them undateable. And Im speaking from experience. I worked with sex workers for five years in a street outreach in a major city. Every single one of those girls/guys were there because of bad circumstances in their lives - and it was very often abuse or drugs that kept them locked into sex work. The whole idea that its a victimless job if you do it online is a joke. Its a sick world and it only destroys people's souls in the long run. Only the inexperienced and horny men want to believe there are no personal consequences. There most definitely are.
Nothing wrong with it, but it lacks the class and dignity generally associated with a head of state and/or their partners. Though it is of course fitting right in with the rest of the shitshow.
Including "Marries a woman who does soft porn shoots" is a little sad, there's nothing wrong with that. Everything else on that list is fucking heinous though
I wish I could do soft porn for a living. But I'm an ugly looking guy. But those who can should be allowed to. It's a job.
Well might be ok with you, but I think the average woman has more respect for herself than doing porn shoots and I certainly wouldn't date someone who didn't have a higher standard than that. All those girls doing Only Fans are finding out the hard way that it comes back to bite you in the long run.
he raped his wife, whos is now buried at his golf resort for tax purposes.
I absolutely agree with everything you said, and I also wholeheartedly agree that the orange idiot is a pervert and most likely a pedophile. However, being with a person who has worked as a sex worker does not make someone a pervert.
Hell, even if 24 were a conspiracy, just the last remaining one makes him a rapist. And at least one was held up in court.
Our country should not be run by a rapist.
Suppresses Epstein list for completely unknown and certainly not ulterior motives.
I am not sure what to highlight from there, but there's a lot of info here: https://medium.com/@mistagrinch/an-unsettling-pattern-a-comprehensive-look-at-trumps-sexual-controversies-and-underworld-a876887ecd85
There's also sources, which might be worth checking. There's at least one unconfirmed thing from some Washington post draft that was later removed from the final article.
The only response about it seems fo be "We (or the Washington Post Writers Group, our affiliated syndicate) edit every column to try to make it as good as it can be. We don't think it would be fair to our writers to discuss the editing process, and don't see what is to be gained by talking about things that are not published — there are countless drafts that never see the light of day."