Skip Navigation

YOUR BODY BETRAYS YOUR PAPALCY

"LOOK UPON THE FACE OF YOUR NEW POPE. HIS HAPLOTYPE IS IRRELEVANT. HIS PERUVIAN HERITAGE ASIDE, LOOK INTO THE EYES OF A CHICAGO SPORTS FAN AND KNOW THAT HE HAS SUFFERED LIFETIMES OF ANGUISH. THE FAILURES OF THE HAM SANDWICH RACE PALE IN COMPARISON TO THE 'DOUBLE DOINK', THE BULLS AFTER THE YEAR 2000, AND THE UNSPEAKABLE TRAUMA OF BEING A CUBS FAN. KNOW THAT I DO NOT SPARE HIM THE JUSTIFIED TRUTH ABOUT HIS GENETICS OUT OF CONCERN, BUT MERELY RESTRAINT; THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL MISERY I NEED TO PLACE UPON A CHICAGO FAN, IT WOULD MAKE ME SEEM WEAK AND OPPORTUNISTIC... LIKE YOU, HAM SANDWICH."

30 comments
  • Do archeologists ever use skulls for gender identification in digs? I suspect it's incredibly unreliable to use as a means of identification due to overlapping variations.

    • You can, but it's not an exact science. Any responsible anthropologist calls it a sex estimate because it's not a sure thing. Broadly speaking biologically male skeletons tend to be more robust than biologically female skeletons but there are plenty of exceptions to this "rule".

      Edit: ideally you'd also be using other methods for sex estimation and comparing all your results. It's still just an estimate if course because there's plenty of room for interpretation of skeletal remains. Plus obviously biological sex ≠ gender but that should go without saying

    • Afaik they use pelvis, though other bones are also used when pelvis is unavailable, this is way less reliable though.

  • Can't even have a good, faithful Catholic church anymore

    because of woke 😤😤😤😤

  • I thought up two derangement syndromes today: there's Rachel Zegler Derangement Syndrome and there's also Everyone I Don't Like Is Secretly Trans Derangement Syndrome. Psychologists of hexbear note, these two often take up space in the average reactionary's head.

30 comments