He has the right to be judged by a jury of his peers, and it appears as if his peers agree with his actions.
- "As this man's peers, you must be the judge of his actions."
  
  "Ok"
  
  "Wait, not like that"
  
  Yup. The article mentions that the prosecutors have a problem, but the U.S. people certainly don't.
- "Friedman Agnifilo would ask potential jurors where they reside in Manhattan and where they get their news sources from to determine their political leanings," Kerwick said.
  
  I mean, he is from a wealthy family, but there's still not going to be many working class people in Manhattan.
  
  I think people are expecting too much from the jury.
  
  It's going to be a bunch of insanely wealthy people who will 100% want to remind everyone the rich are untouchable
  
  Median household income in Manhattan is about 100k. It's not all insanely wealthy people.
  
  I make $11k per year.
  
  $100k IS insanely wealthy.
  
  Not if you live in Manhattan. Housing alone there is stupidly expensive.
  
  Not in NYC, that leaves you with hundreds of dollars a month after rent if you’re lucky.
  
  I made 70-90k in Boston and had nothing left for savings if I dared to eat out once a week.
  
  Dear God man, get ANY other job
  
  I've had multiple injuries at work (and a few from sports) so am unable to do my former labor-type jobs. I'm also over 65 so retraining is out of the question.
  
  Worked minimum wage positions most of my life so have no savings and currently live in a rooming house.
  
  There's lots of us out here scraping the bottom of the barrel just to survive.
  
  11k is like $5.5/h, assuming you’re working full time. It’s well below minimum wage.
  
  As stated in the comment you responded to I am no longer working because of injuries and age.
  
  Are you saying pensions are allowed to go below minimum wage in the U.S.?
  
  I live in Canada.
  
  Sounds like you're vastly outside the norm and your perception may be skewed. You'll just have to take peoples word that $100k/yr in Manhattan is not "insanely wealthy."
  
  You also didn’t answer the question. Are you just trolling?
  
  That really sucks, and I'm genuinely sorry you've had to deal with all that. $100K USD can be eaten up very quickly depending on your city's cost of living though. I'd imagine someone making $100k USD in Manhattan would be barely scraping by as well
  
  100K in Manhattan is nothing. My father was a principal earning $150K and still could barely get by in the city.
  
  When apartments run total 40K annually, 100K is just a step above poverty wages.
  
  You have it backwards. 100k in Manhattan is not wealthy, let alone insanely wealthy. 11k is insanely impoverished, even if you live in the middle of nowhere.
  
  I was living with about 10k CAD/y for a few years when I was single and I was mostly fine.
  
  Granted, this was in the 2010s. And of course I wasn't in Manhattan, as you can guess by the currency.
  
  Now, I'm making about 70k CAD with a family (sole provider) and I'm just staying afloat.
  
  In Manhattan, it's enough to get by. It's a working-class salary there.
  
  That's well below the poverty line wages. That's dirt poor in almost any part of the country let alone Manhattan, one of the most expensive cities in the U.S.
  
  Frezik was talking about the $100K, not the $11K.
  
  Not really. Poverty line in New York City for two adults/two children is $43,890.
  
  https://robinhood.org/news/annual-poverty-tracker-report-by-robin-hood-and-columbia-finds-nyc-poverty-increased-from-18-percent-to-23-percent-in-2022-a-jump-from-1-5-to-2-million-new-yorkers-living-in-poverty/
  
  He thinks you mean 11K/year, and you think he means 100k/year. Just trying to help out... :)
  
  Yeah, as the other person pointed out, I was pointing to the 11K per year comment. Maybe a typo?
  
  NYC or Manhattan?
  
  In the US? That's less than the legal minimum wage
  
  Not if you don't/can't work full time.
  
  Doing what?
  
  Except both sides have the same number of rejections they can apply.
- agree with
  
  I'd accept 'excuse' his actions. I'm firmly of the belief that pain caused the shooter to lose grip of the "hey don't kill people" to where "yeah maybe just this scumbag" seemed okay. And while we wanna kill evil people, vigilante justice is less about them and more about us. And I don't like that us that is willing to kill people outside of the Justice system we built and maintain.
  
  I'm okay with supporting Luigi (if it was him ;-) ) get through this break with reality that was engineered by shitbag HMOs, accepting that a person died (terrible as he was, still a person who could have been rehabilitated), accepting that it was an insanity of a kind, and getting Luigi any help he needs, medical or mental, to get back up to a productive and fulfilling life.
  
  As in, let's not ruin Luigi completely, as already one fixable human is dead so lets not kill another.
  
  And I don’t like that us that is willing to kill people outside of the Justice system we built and maintain.
  
  I think this is the disconnect. I don't believe I have any (even 1/330 million) input into what the justice system is. When the Supreme Court is being openly bribed and stacked through legislative malfeasance, and as a result are taking away rights that a majority of the country supports, and yet nothing happens in response, it's not our system. The very fact that there was a massive manhunt for this particular killer while others get ignored and he now has a federal murder charge because he was on a cell phone or planned it in another state or some bullshit is demonstration that this isn't a system built to pursue justice equally. Neither the justice system nor the health system that provoked this reaction is based on codifying the broad cultural consent about "how things should work".
  
  Maybe he's guilty of manslaughter in my book. Murder? I don't see it.
  
  Manslaughter is when you didn't mean to kill the person. You might be thinking of justifiable homicide?
  
  He didn't mean to kill him, he just wanted to put a few rounds in the guy

You've viewed 276 comments.