You're viewing a single thread.
Seeing them side by side, the newer Microsoft logo sucks ass.
70 1 ReplyImo, it peaked at 2001.
47 1 Reply'85 looks modern
36 0 Reply92-94 is GOAT for me
27 1 Replyit's nostalgic, but it's a fucking horrible logo
21 0 ReplyBut it is wooshing! With solid primary colors!
10 0 ReplyMore pixels bro
2 0 Reply
Especially since there was no way to shrink it down and have it look good on the computers of the time, back when 640x480 was the norm.
5 0 Replythere was an icon form that had 4x5 trailing squares instead of 6x7... commendable, but still noisy.
2 0 Reply
these are windows logos, not MS itself, and this is out of date, current windows logo as of 2021:
also i want to put the 2006 one in my mouth 👅
21 0 ReplyIt's 18 by now so that's ok
12 0 Replygive it to me give me the 18 year old softly glowing glass marble
7 0 ReplyWhat the fuck now!?
5 0 ReplyFirst time on the internet?
2 0 ReplyIm just genuinely surprised that 2006 was 18 years ago.
5 0 Reply
It's not fine if Windows doesn't consent and to get Windows to consent, you'd have to consent to so much crap that it wouldn't be worth it.
3 0 Reply
The original one is my favorite. Simple, easy to recognize at any size, looks good in both black and white and color. It's a pretty great logo.
17 1 ReplyThe original logo looks like the generic spacers/blockers websites put up when the page loads but the content hasn't yet.
5 0 Reply
I like 95 to 2k best.
9 0 ReplyMe too, I don't know if I'm biased by nostalgia tho
3 0 Reply
I'm partial to '95.
4 0 ReplyThis damn picture created more conversation than the actual post
3 0 ReplyI'm a zoomer, and I have to say I prefer the current logo. The others just don't look clean. Big black borders, nah
3 1 ReplyI miss the sim card logo
I never got to see it in action since I'm too young, so miss isn't really the right word
But I miss it
1 0 ReplyI leik the SERKUL.
1 0 Reply
#BringBackThePacmanLogo
2 0 Reply