Boeing whistleblower John Barnett was spied on, harassed by managers, lawsuit claims
Boeing whistleblower John Barnett was spied on, harassed by managers, lawsuit claims
Boeing whistleblower John Barnett alleged in a lawsuit prior to his death in South Carolina that he was "harassed" and "humiliated" for speaking out at work.
cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/news/t/910625
Boeing whistleblower John Barnett alleged in a lawsuit prior to his death in South Carolina that he was "harassed" and "humiliated" for speaking out at work.
It stated that Barnett "continually objected to Boeing creating and maintaining a program not approved by the FAA that allowed mechanics to inspect and approve their own work, known as the Multi-function Process Performer."
Boeing should be dismantled and everyone involved in the harassment campaign against Barnett should be charged.
But that'll never happen 'cause it's too big to fail.
Them inspecting their own product was a funny punchline for John Oliver, very much not funny in the real world.
Agreed, Boeing should be dismantled and the people charged.
But that'll never happen 'cause it's too big to fail.
capitalism at its finest, who would have tought.
I don't understand why "too big to fail" is also "too big to be broken up." We broke up what was once literally the only company you could use if you wanted to use a telephone and it seems to have worked out.
If the government is giving any money to these assholes it should be from buying all their stock at fire sale prices using money from fines paid by the CEOs and board of directors.
Boeing's hit job must have been well planned.
The killer would have had to kill him in his car, wrap his hands around the gun to establish fingerprint marks. A company like Boeing that's part of the Military-Industrial Complex wouldn't have an issue finding a highly trained contract killer.
Bribes at the local authority level (maybe higher too) to have them rule it a suicide with no further investigation needed. No need for further pesky questions.
Now all I'm waiting on is for the judge to toss out his incomplete testimony since it isn't complete.
Then just wait a few weeks until the media focuses on other things.
Then the execs can have martinis while stock number go up.
They don't need to do that, they could have just called him on a burner phone and threatened to kill his family if he didn't kill himself. Forensically indistinguishable from suicide, but absolutely murder by coercion.
Regardless of if they actually hired a hitman, it's very clear that Boeing harassed and psychologically attacked this man to the point of him ending up dead.
Whether they actually hired a man to pull that trigger or convinced him to pull it himself, legally his murder would be on their hands and they damn well need charged for it.
Why did they wait so long to off him then?
Being willing to kill someone as a "last option" and wanting to kill everyone who poses the slightest threat are not the same motivations.
Also thinking about it, how many people at a company the size of Boeing become a threat by being bothered with criminal practices violating safety and other law and ethic standards? How many do we not hear about because the "normal" coercion tactics work?
Having half your engineering department wind up dead because they raised concerns about issues with the production could backfire much more to begin with, but also it would make every engineer look for a different employer quickly. So trying to destroy someones reputation first, ousting him, creating a "him vs. us" mentality is preferential. It also makes it easier for the company to move on after killing him, if the need arises.
So both from a emotionally crippled, but not fully devoid point of view and from an completely psychopathic cold blooded strategy point of view it makes sense to not pull the trigger on everyone right away.
I'm pretty sure there are rules that govern how to handle a witness dying in the middle of testimony
"Look the other way or you're next"
If people won't hold corporations accountable no one will.
And murdered
Yeah, maybe it's just me, but that seems like the bigger deal.
“Self inflicted”
Just like the whistleblower who outed the government for selling crack in LA to fund overthrowing governments around the world.
True. Suicide by not one, but two bullets if you can believe that.
They forgot assassinated.
Why put a hit on a guy when you can just harass him until he kills himself?
Than again neither scenario reflects super well on Beoing. It's like it's run by Mr. Burns...
Given that he was nearing the end of his testimony and people who knew him said he was not depressed, there's still a good chance it was a hit.
Also see: Aaron Schwartz
"fun" fact, Aaron was prosecuted by the same prosecutor as the Tsarnaev brother.
Don't post Fox