Skip Navigation

Which one is more energy/fuel efficient to cool the inside of the car: lower thermostat + lower fan speed, or slightly higher thermostat + higher fan speed?

On a hot day and traveling in a car, which method of keeping the occupants comfortable with the A/C is more energy and fuel efficient?

  • Set the thermostat to a lower temperature and keep fan speed to the lowest setting
  • Set the thermostat to a slightly higher temperature and compensate by setting the fan to a higher speed so you can feel cool enough with the breeze
27 comments
  • Likely doesn’t matter. Like. At all.

    Ac is likely chilled to a given temperature regardless of what the final temp is called for.

    The air is cooled by blowing it over a radiator on the cold side of the AC’s compressor, the radiator then absorbs heat from the air (putting it into the coolant.)

    As long as you’re not putting more heat into the coolant than the chiller can extract, it’s only going to remove so much heat- more if it’s slower, because it’s in more time, it then it’s spread across less air, if that makes sense.

    Regardless, the way temperature is controlled is by mixing it with additional ambient-temp air. (Either cabin air or outside air.)

    So technically, it would be most “effecient” to have full cold, but (as already said,) the ac system is effecient enough it basically doesn’t matter.

    Going the other way doesn’t matter at all because it uses waste heat from the engine in a bypass loop. That said, if you have a cold car you’ll slow down the engine warming up by turning on the heat. (You can see this when it’s very cold by warming up the engine and watching the temp gauge when you turn on the air.)

    EVs are a bit different- heating from cold start is done with electric heaters. Once the car is moving and the motors are hot, they typically use waste heat from there.

    I assume there’s little difference between ice and ev in cooling,

  • theoretically the most fuel efficient would be not having it on at all.

    But it really depends on how vehicle refrigerant phase change loops work. I'm not a mechanic nor am i familiar so hopefully someone else can chime in?

    There are a few outcomes here depending on the cycle. If it uses some sort of refrigerant flow restriction that is variable, then theoretically the thermostat setting will have an effect. (i would assume this is a case these days) However the effect it will have is not going to be linear, given that its a fluid pump cycle. Though it's powered directly by the engine (most likely?) so that probably won't matter at all, engines are horribly inefficient to begin with.

    if it's not using some sort of variable valve to control restriction and thus cooling potential, it's doing some other shenanigans and running the phase change at a set point, though it would have to introduce some sort of external variable there in order to compensate so probably not.

    I would probably set the ac to a low temp, and then the fan to a low speed, because it takes advantage of physics better that way (the greater the difference in temperature, the more effectively you can transfer heat away from it) since you're running a low fan speed, you're gonna need a high temperature gradient to make the best use of that. There is also the inverse, but i doubt that would be better tbh.

    Though i think realistically, it just won't matter enough for you to bother. Like you'll probably see a bigger difference in usage by taking a different route somewhere, or idling longer. There are a number of other factors that can impact fuel efficiency.

27 comments