Capitalist corruption is inescapable
Capitalist corruption is inescapable
Capitalist corruption is inescapable
Same as people stay in unfulfilling, shitty jobs that pay less, just so they don't risk losing health insurance or other "benefits."
Double yeah
Ugh thanks for an unpleasant flashback :(
Ex was cheating all over town and my only choice for over six months was either put up with it or be homeless
I once told this story on reddit, and the majority consensus was that it was my fault for not working harder or whatever
smug redditors offering unsolicited "advice" are the absolute worst
You're saying I shouldn't divorce my wife because they forget to put the spices back on the rack?
Whereas my unsolicited advice as a lemming is way more fun. So, to start with, im gonna need you to get an obsidian dagger, and look up where to buy live chickens.
Also, get some gloves, bleach, and antiemetics; this is gonna get messy.
Maybe they posted in an “advice” sub. That doesn’t make redditors not terrible at giving advice, just maybe it wasn’t unsolicited.
I had to help two friends who were in a similar situation, it was stressful for both of them to break up, knowing that there was housing insecurity. Getting all the arrangements together also took months.
Yup. It was traumatic enough that ever since then I've always made sure that my current partner always has enough money in an account under their name to be able to leave whenever they want. It's nice knowing that they're staying with me because they want to.
I'm so sorry. You didn't deserve ANY of that bullshit!
Sucks that you went through that. I'm not sure how I would have done that without getting in legal trouble.
Also, fuck the haters and trolls. People who don't know shit always try to give their advice.....so anyway here's what you should have done........
Found out a month after buying our new house the reason we never saw our neighbors. They were in the midst of a divorce, but still living in the house, with the wife's boyfriend. So visits were a bit awkward. Fortunately that was right after the housing crash, so they were only stuck in the house for 2 years.
A lovely young couple bought the place and spent a year renovating it to live in with their kid...then divorced 6 months later. I don't think couples should live in that house any more, there's too much bad juju stored up in the walls.
I dunno, renovating a house is hard, especially if you are living in it at the same time. You'd want to make sure your relationship is rock solid before attempting that. That said, kids are hard, you'd want to make sure your relationship is rock solid before attempting that, so yeah, maybe its the house ..
There needs to be a one room at a time rule.
There's a damn good reason why we in the working class are gaslit and prodded into converting our romantic relationships into glorified labour arrangements (ie, marriage) as soon as possible - intimacy requires time and energy... time and energy that, under a capitalist system, must be spent labouring for the parasite class and nothing else.
It's also the reason why any children that results from such intimate relationships must be mass-corraled into glorified creches (ie, our so-called "education system") at the first opportune moment - we can't have the working class spend any undue amount of time actually doing any parenting, now can we?
Women have almost always through history needed a male supporter for housing or they needed to live in family cooperative situations.
Hell I'm a man and I stayed dating a woman I should have left (because she was abusive) because I couldn't have done without her part of the rent at the time. Shit happens ig. Got a new job and now I'm able to afford it alone, she's gone, shit rules.
We know pre-farming societies were far more balanced between the sexes, if not outright matriarchical
When 'women's rights' became a thing,and women could live as independent humans, young widows became an oddity.
I guess you can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.
So many decisions get made because you gotta make sure you secure a bag of some kind.
this is why more dv shelters/womens shelters need to offer vocational assistance
Capitalism doesn’t care about minutiae. It only cares about the end results. Unfortunately, minutiae is actual human lives in this case.
Quarterly profits. Not end result, or they'd build infrastructure.
I'd guess most of history in most of the world was little different though. If you break relationship with the group of people providing food and shelter, you might have to figure out food and shelter on your own. As shitty as it is, smart people line up the next relationship before breaking off the old if they can't do it on their own.
Is this your assumption about the ancirnt world, or did you actually read real archaeologists and anthropologists?
Wildly unbalanced capitalism without strong controls and social policy. All systems seem to fall prey to corruption because people try to corrupt the system to enrich themselves and their friends, then cement their gains with whatever power they can flex.
What exactly is it about "capitalism" that you like? What are you so attached to, that you wpuld contrive to keep something so fucked up?
The ability to invest in new ideas and advance them more rapidly thanks to the incentive of profit. Yeah, shitload of baggage comes with that when it’s not on a tight leash, but capitalism is excellent at seeking out new things to make money with. Technologies, meds, design, whatever. Patently obvious when you compare that to, say, quantum physics, which has no profitable ROI and constantly struggles for funding and thereby advances at a snail’s pace.
"But my version of Capitalism will work!"
As opposed to what system, after it's been used for generations and shitty people have captured and twisted it?
Says every person designing the system to benefit themselves most.
The US seems like an increasingly bigger dystopia for every post about basic human rights that is a standard in the civilised world but they are lacking. But still they keep voting to let the billionaires rip them off decade after decade.
Voting, yeah that matters. The institutions are captured. If we ever won a vote, it would be thrown away ajd the oligarchy's choice would be appointed.
Edit: 'if'. In 2000 this happened explicitly.
And non-humans too 🙂
An iron curtain is not the tool to realize such truths. Let people roam, but with open eyes.
Yeah...
So hey, all of the places who claim not to be capitalists, are you saying those places are not corrupt or that their corruption is of a different type? Or is there no such place and therefor a word without any distinction?
Oh, get off this dead horse, will ya. Like anything else cannot do this, only capitalism can
Do you have reason to believe that this problem is currently caused by something other than capitalism?
Of course. It predates capitalism and any other -ism as well. Or did everyone live happily in ancient times?
What do you suggest as an alternative? “Anarchy?”
Yes. Anarchism. Check the comm you're in.
You're hilarious.
Reminds me of the time someone posted "All Socialist countries eventually fail." I asked "What about Canada?" The explained that the conservative Heritage Foundation rated Canada as freer than the USA. "Great. That means we can have Canadian style healthcare here, right?"
All countries under any possible system eventually fail, because of entropy eating away at complex systems if nothing else gets it first. What makes a better judge of a country is what living in it is like for the time that it exists.
Am Canadian. It's not a socialist country.
Yes.
What is your solution?
We don't need a solution, everything is already perfect here in the USA.
/s
Step 1: Acknowledge the problem.
Just getting the bulk of people to acknowledge, out loud, that the current capitalist structures are creating many unacceptably bad outcomes would be a start. People often leap to "well anarchy is bad too!" without spending enough time on how big the current state is.
Yeah, actually. If you’re interested in learning more, here’s a relatively short read that cover a lot of the basics: https://crimethinc.com/tce
It's a bold strategy, Cotton, let's see if it pays off for aubeynarf.
what is anarchy in your own words. we'll wait.
I admit it. I couldn’t never pay the rent on my own. When I was younger I essentially stayed with whoever picked me. My marriage went on way too long because I needed to finish college/fieldwork or be stuck with a man who hated me and had someone ten years younger he’d gotten pregnant at college…funny that none of us could actually afford to leave each other until I graduated and got out of their way. Because of environment and poor decisions, I put myself and the kids through unforgivable stress. I’m in my thirties now, the kids are almost grown, and I make great money. But I’m an empty person. I’ll give them what I never had though, so they won’t be in relationships to pay their bills. I’m pretty sure one will be an engineer.
Sorry to read that, it seems economically if people can get to late 30's paying little rent, having no mortgage they have saved money.
I'm 46 years old and so paying rent from here on till the end is cheaper than a mortgage.
Of course I could not have children.
Yeah I think you’re right. If I didn’t have the responsibilities I do, renting a smaller place until expiring would probably be my route.