OpenAI declares AI race “over” if training on copyrighted works isn’t fair use - Ars Technica
National security hinges on unfettered access to AI training data, OpenAI says.
Shut the fuck up you rodent
What a bunch of whiny children these CEOs are. It reminds me of screaming children at the grocery store who didn't get something they wanted.
And yet, in all the CEO books, they talk about disruptive innovation, and how a “change in the rules” creates new opportunities.
Sam Altman is nothing more than a copyright violator (the courts like the term pirate) who should owe billions, if not trillions in legal penalties.
He's honestly not wrong
Frankly, efforts should be directed toward evolving more efficient and less error prone models, not seeking out the cheapest training material and hording it
People are so blindly angry with AI tech that they're willing to double-down on our worst corporate entitlement programs just to see Altman cry a little, and that makes me angrier than seeing a wrong AI response get passed around like gospel.
Very good.
That's an absolute win.
I have a better idea let's sue them collectively for trillions in damages. Let's kill AI entirely. We need to be fixing our climate not fulfilling the dreams of scifi nerds.
We've also already gotten some benefit for truely useful, non-copyright infringing AI (generally the kinds used by scientists evaluating big data sets like protein folding and finding exoplanets). None of those AIs rely on stolen art or stolen copyrighted material. But they have benefited somewhat from the pursuit of AI processing hardware. So even if you are pro-AI where it has shown any real value as a tool, you still don't need the copyright infringement. Let's kill OpenAI, and other LLMs that stole to get where they are. The actually useful AI probably won't go anywhere, even if the companies pushing their AI the most right now all go under.
As a scifi nerd, I doubt these guys actually read scifi.
So the software cannot improve making connections between information, only just be fed more data.. I'm ignorant about how this works but that somewhat sounds like giving up.
That's all LLMs could ever do. This was never the path to generalized AI in the colloquial sense.
I don't think it is fair to say that. LLMs in the current form, or by themselves cannot do better. Does not mean, that this basis can be further evolved to do better. But that requires good research, and a lot of open source to cross check and evolve. There is no "business case" in that. Hoarding resources and knowledge and keeping other people from it on the other hand, is something the MBAs understand.
The software isn't doing nothing. What it does do, I would assume, could be better...
What is it in a man's soul that can make it so their eyes never quite match the look on their face?
Very rhetorical btw it's sociopathy
CEOs don't have souls
Same diff
You said that well. He always looks so disturbing.
Well it's about fucking time
