Game Science is reportedly banning content creators who want Black Myth: Wukong codes from discussing certain topics, including "feminist propaganda".
Black Myth: Wukong developer Game Science is reportedly trying to ban content creators from discussing certain topics in exchange for game codes.
In a leaked document, which at least one content creator has publicly stated they received from Game Science, there is a "do's and dont's" section, telling those who receive a code what they cannot discuss in their content. Here, the document informs those with Black Myth: Wukong codes that they cannot include "politics" and "feminist propaganda" in their coverage of the game, among other topics.
I was just going to write "China's gonna China", but then I remember this particular studio goes a little further than that:
In one instance, a lead is said to have written that men and women play different games because of "biological conditions", following up his comment by writing: "Fck sissies, fck tragic love stories, fuck moon-lit peach blossoms and flute-playing scholars! [...] Some things are just for men, their depression, their anger, their pain...".
The studio is also said to have shared job recruitment posters that boasted "friends with benefits" as a job perk. Another was reported to have read, "Fatties should f*ck off."
Fuck China, but I really don't see how this is specific to them. Lets not pretend this shit couldn't happen (and is happening) pretty much anywhere else on the planet.
Except he's not saying people have different tastes. He's saying genders have different tastes, of which only that gender can enjoy and they should enjoy them. He's saying the opposite of what you're implying it says.
Others have already pointed out important things about what the dev has said; I would like to add that the book the game is based on has a number of female characters which are simply not in the game.
But what I'm thinking is that they don't really have much leverage, I don't know who is expecting this studio to put out more than this one anticipated game before returning to relative obscurity. At most they can provide a shorter demo and deny the full game codes to reviewers that didn't obey.
I would quarantine that game in my review bucket based on it's isolation of specific trigger words such as 'COVID-19'. I'd rather talk about Winnie the Pooh, tbh.
If the same document forbade reviewers from talking about, say, white replacement (which I don't personally believe btw, just trying to hold up a mirror, here), I'm sure you wouldn't be crying censorship.