If global warming is a biproduct of humans, wouldn't the logical answer be to kill 2/3rds of the humans?
If global warming is a biproduct of humans, wouldn't the logical answer be to kill 2/3rds of the humans?
Maybe we should just start nuking the most densely packed cities/countries. Sorry NYC, Tokyo, and basically all of India.
But would this not solve the problem?
You're viewing a single thread.
View all comments
56
comments
The thing is that that's an extremely fucked up and evil thing to do
36 0 ReplyI'll say. Even Thanos only wanted to kill HALF the population.
26 0 ReplyWell, I was going to say just kill ALL the humans, but then I thought people would get mad that I'm killing all the humans. So I said 2/3rds.
9 0 Reply9 0 ReplyNeed to up those numbers to 111% of the Humans
4 0 ReplyKilling all humans would solve the problem though.
1 0 Reply
You've viewed 56 comments.
Scroll to top