I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, messages or posts, both past and future. With this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute. NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tacitly allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates. FACEBOOK DOES NOT HAVE MY PERMISSION TO SHARE PHOTOS OR MESSAGES.”
Look, the guy has a hard enough time remembering the letters, and copying the words from his "reminder card." His brain is already taxed! Give him a break.
Someone should set up an alternative state-citizen (or whatever) Postmaster General, assuring these people that they are the one legitimate one because (insert pseudolegal mumbo-jumbo here) and, for a monthly fee (payable in advance, real cash only), they will handle their complaints and send them back encouraging replies about legal actions they’re initiating against the “fraudsters” in admiralty court.
They don't exactly believe the government isn't real. They say it isn't legitimate, but they don't really understand the concept of legitimacy. They think it's simultaneously a real, inescapable entity and something you can cheat your way out of.
Yeah its sorta funny as you can live mostly without the government if you want to live as a substanance farmer. Even the amish use cash but after property ownership your farm does not need to make a profit which it won't if you don't use currency or public roads or spaces or anything. Heck you will likely lose out mostly since the life you live would likely qualify you for assistance.
If a customer gave me this back to return with all this shit all over it, I'd tell them I couldn't accept it. This is essentially defacing the mail in my book. I'll give them a solution to their problem and tell them to remove their mailbox, that way I won't have to deal with that nutjob anymore.
Even if this was a valid tactic, does this person not realise the person on the other side would actually need to be able to read what is written for them to action anything?
Not everyone has nice handwriting (I sure don't), but you should at least try to actually be legible - that bit in the middle is just barely legible to someone actually trying to read what it says.
Also, not everyone who sends mail to you has to have a contract with you (and certainly not an international contract), especially not for a summons.
This kind of letter isn't asking you nicely, it's telling you what"s gonna happen, and you better listen.
Games Magazine readers back in the 80s and 90s regularly sent mail to the magazine with the address in the form of a puzzle and postal workers would solve them and send them into the magazine. It was pretty cool.