Since the dramatic decrease in hashrate[1] on 29/05/24 from ~2.8 GH/s to ~1.8 GH/s as of 01/06/24. This has shaken up the pool distribution[2]; as a result, nanopool now holds ~576 MH/s (30% of the total 1.8 GH/s.)This isn’t a five-alarm fire, but it is mildly concerning. This can potentially repeat...
Since the dramatic decrease in hashrate[1] on 29/05/24 from ~2.8 GH/s to ~1.8 GH/s as of 01/06/24. This has shaken up the pool distribution[2]; as a result, nanopool now holds ~576 MH/s (30% of the total 1.8 GH/s.)This isn’t a five-alarm fire, but it is mildly concerning. This can potentially repeat the MineXMR 51% scare of 2022[3]. If any of you fine folks would consider mining on a decentralised pool such as p2ool[4], now is the time.
Ps, I am in no way affiliated with p2ool. Happy mining.
[1] https://www.coinwarz.com/mining/monero/hashrate-chart
[2] https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero
[3] https://cointelegraph.com/news/monero-community-concerned-as-leading-mining-pool-nears-51-of-ecosystem-s-total-hash-rate
[4] https://p2pool.io/#pool
~baz
How is this different from https://xmr.id/ ? Which has been around a while. I still don't quite understand paying for something you can set yourself.
Why say "coming soon" so often? Why so many domains? Domain seizer? That's what onions are for. This post is a sandwich short of a picnic. Nice use of DNSSEC by the way, amateur hour over here. Shitty name choice, ripe for confusion and misleading. Gtfo
Nobody cares until there’s pressure.
The project is run by volunteers