Kids find independence from their parents without the costs of driving, though safety risks remain
Teens are taking to suburban streets across the U.S. while skipping a classic rite of passage: driving a car.
Instead, their families are spending as much as $3,000 on electric bicycles, the battery-powered vehicles that offer the convenience of traditional bikes without the sweat or strain that comes with unassisted pedaling.
Y'all ready to see a bunch of legislature heavily regulating ebikes because car manufacturers sent their army of lobbyists to reclaim a lost demographic?
WSJ paywall, but the summary is sufficient food for thought: in some ways, the ebike is now enabling what the automobile was meant to enable in the 1950s: suburban mobility, freedom, the open road, independence, all that jazz. But the ebike brings its own advantages, such as parking nearly anywhere, going off-road or off-trail, transit as a range extender, and riding alongside friends. Motorcyclists will be familiar with these advantages, but the ebike really brings them to the fore with an even lower cost of ownership.
Obviously, there are still a few drawbacks, such as weather exposure and speed. But quite frankly, local trips in town don't need much more than 20-30 mph (32-48 kph) and Phoenix AZ is an anomaly unto itself.
But what I think is most uplifting is that teens of this generation will grow up with the holy trifecta: the formal or online education to build or fix their way out of problems with their bike, access to 3d printers (eg at libraries) to realize modifications, and a platform that is growing more ubiquitous by the year. This is the setup for a virtuous cycle.
Optimistically, I can see ebikes becoming a part of the teenage American identity in the 2020s, an expressive product of their time. Not by force of poverty or necessity, but because of want for meaningful experiences and a general dislike for the drudgery that is driving an automobile and the associated traffic.
I will admit that today's ebikes still have not converged toward adequate standards, such that maintaining an ebike still involves a mix of standard bike tools plus proprietary ebike tools such as for batteries and motors. But it's reasonable to expect market forces to whittle down the variants, in the same way cars settled upon gasoline/petrol as standard (versus diesel, kerosene, alcohol) and left-hand drive (outside the former British Empire).
When I said "standard", I probably should have said "prevalent" or "most common". Although in the USA, it's far-and-away gasoline that's reliably available at every fuel station, with diesel being an accommodation along highways and truck routes, but not reliably available within cities.
In the USA, diesel passenger cars are uncommon enough that there are zero diesel hybrid cars for sale here. It didn't even occur to me -- as a Californian -- that such hybrids existed, whereas they do in Europe and other markets.
My understanding is that petrol is still the #1 fuel source for cars in Europe, but diesel is much closer behind in #2. Is that the case?
Most of these bikes can go 20 mph+, with many able to do 30mph+ in "off road mode". For someone that lives in a smaller city that doesn't require freeway use, these are a fantastic way to save money on transport.
Often the car is the one their parents used to drive, but the parents upgrade and the kid gets the old one. Technically it could be sold, but nobody considers that money, while the ebike is bought new (not many ebikes on the used market yet) and thus does cost real money. Nobody considers the cost of insurance or gas for the car too even though parents pay that and complain about it (do not confuse complain/talk with considering)