Just checked out the article and video. I'm a bit out of the loop, but the woman in the video says
Ms King-Slutzky said: “Nobody’s asking them to bring anything.
“We’re asking them to not violently stop us from bringing in [food and water]’’
Is this the hilariously mollycoddled part? The article makes it sound like the protestors want "to be fed", but her quotes seem to suggest they just want to not be assaulted for bringing their own food? Or at least, asking for food they have already paid for to be provided? Can someone clear this up?
It just seems like any time some young liberal college students want to protest something (like a genocide), there's an arsenal of right wing media out to make them look like morons. Sure, young people don't always have their shit together, but as a country we should be in support of protests and protestors, even if we don't agree with their message. Why shit on free speech?
We taught every student never again. Never again stand by and watch people be killed for no reason. Never again be idle while genocide happens on our watch.
The the Molly coddled people are the one saying nothing while the evil happens.
Moral decay does ultimately destroy society. Where people go wrong is when they demand their side be in power. It is possible to enforce moral standards without one side winning over others.
When people view the world through wijs and losses, who deciding who is a victim based who the person is and not due to actions, that can only produce evil. Enforcing strict morals does not favour anybody.