Kamala really pulled back the curtain on just how cynically liberals view idpol topics with that.
Really just coming right out and saying "I use race, class, and gender issues as a means of making myself look like I'm fighting for the oppressed, but I ultimately don't care otherwise."
This is exactly why there are so many reactionary anti-idpol "bernie bro" type succdems. They can intuitively sense that Democrats cynically use identity politics as a means of avoiding actually calling for or implementing policy, but instead of blaming the cynical usage, they blame identity politics as a whole.
IT WAS A DEBATE! 😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣 IT WAS A DEBATE!🤣🤣🤣😂 IT WAS A DEBATE, THE WHOLE REASON- LITERALLY IT WAS A DEBATE 😂😂😂😂 IT WAS CALLED A DEBATE, 😂 AND WE WOULD TRAVEL TO THE DEBATE, 😂 AND THERE WERE JOURNALISTS THERE COVERING THE DEBATE, 🤣 WHERE THERE WOULD BE A DEBATE 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
I wonder if she's any more popular than she was in 2020 when she was the first to drop out of the primary. I don't have any better sense of her as a politician or what her platform would represent compared to Genocide Joe. All she's done across the past three years has been show up to work excessively intoxicated and try to stumble through a speech that would have been unpopular/not important enough for the president to give. Her only vocal supporters are the most unhinged goobers on twitter and there are like 9 of them.
I think we all know that as president she would establish a student loan debt forgiveness program for Pell Grant recipients who start a business that operates for three years in disadvantaged communities.
That's where I have to qualify it with excessively. Going to work high is praxis because it hurts the employer. Going to work too high becomes self-defeating when it calls too much attention to yourself. There's a comfortable middle ground where she can't be a war criminal but can say a full sentence without laughing and singing half a nursery rhyme.
The absolute worst VP choice they could've made back in 2020 and now it comes back to bite them. Pretty much anyone in that field would have a better chance against Trump (with the exception of maybe Warren) than Kamala
"If I had a nickel for every time Donald J. Trump beat a woman in a presidential election, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't much, but it's weird that it happened twice."
My theory is that the Democrats shoved her aside because they realized she was terrible and had no chance of ever being a presidential candidate, that's why we've barely heard from her except for and a couple of other disasters when she was actually allowed to speak in public. lol if they're trying her as a viable candidate at this point.
Can't wait to be told I have to vote for her, she's the only viable option, after being told I had to vote for Biden, because he's the only viable option