anyone want a copy of "Great Man Theory the Magazine"?

They literally have Hitler right there on the cover
- Hitler did change the world alright. Not for the better (quite the oppositie actually), but he did change it.

Mother Teresa did not change anything. She positioned herself in some of the most impoverished areas of the world and told dying people how great their suffering was for their souls.

don't forget all the anti-birth-control stuff! very cool!
She also accepted money from and defended "Baby Doc" Duvalier and corrupt businessmen.
I think the Catholic Church just needed some kind of W after the allegations came out, and that's why she was propped up. What I don't understand is why in my non-Catholic country she was mentioned in school books as a great person.

They put the guy who bathed his feet in the toilets at Atari and died trying to cure cancer with smoothies next to Einstein

one of the tech guru’s go-to stress relievers during the early days of Apple was to head to the company toilets and soak his bare feet in the toilet water. In fact, the guy had a little bit of a hygiene problem — Isaacson also revealed how Jobs was put on the night shift while he worked at game-maker Atari because he rarely bathed and would walk around the office in his bare feet
- okay so what are the mechanics of this? is he... sitting on the floor and then putting his feet up and over the rim of the toilet bowl? is he standing in the toilet? did he bring a chair into a stall?
- Oh, I misremembered and kind of mashed the two together. I thought that was an Atari thing.
the fact that you said "next to" instead of "below" made me cackle like a hyena when I scrolled up and saw Jesus

POCs who changed the word: fought racism and imperialism

White people who changed the world: got rich and / or were Hitler

Is Oprah white now?
- Lincoln also isn’t Hitler you’re right
- I could see Oprah doing a genocide in another timeline. It wouldn't be shocking if she somehow funded one in this one.

Isn't Oprah just a TV star what is the argument for how she (or the Beatles) changed the world?

Oprah was unbelievably influential in promoting quack medicine and psychology which gave mainstream legitimacy to frauds like Dr Oz and Dr Phil and more. She has undoubtedly played a role in the collective damaging of the American psyche
- she did give everybody a car tho so
yeah i find it funny how making popular media is portrayed here as basically being the same as jesus
- Imaging sailing across the Atlantic to build a shitty town so you can practice your version of Oprahism away from the other Oprahites
- sometimes bourgeois media are accidentally based

man fuck the beatles

The fact that so many books still name the Beatles as "the greatest or most significant or most influential" rock band ever only tells you how far rock music still is from becoming a serious art. Jazz critics have long recognized that the greatest jazz musicians of all times are Duke Ellington and John Coltrane, who were not the most famous or richest or best sellers of their times, let alone of all times. Classical critics rank the highly controversial Beethoven over classical musicians who were highly popular in courts around Europe. Rock critics are still blinded by commercial success. The Beatles sold more than anyone else (not true, by the way), therefore they must have been the greatest. Jazz critics grow up listening to a lot of jazz music of the past, classical critics grow up listening to a lot of classical music of the past. Rock critics are often totally ignorant of the rock music of the past, they barely know the best sellers. No wonder they will think that the Beatles did anything worthy of being saved.
- It's just ossified boomer culture that has become the cosmic background of modern cracker culture
- The Beatles were the first band to accumulate a large, consumerist fanbase like we know of modern day examples ranging from Taylor Swift, to the niche bands. Their music is genuinely pretty good (Rubber Soul is their best album imo) and doesn't really sound too dated.
  Lists of artists considered the best do often feature the Beatles at the very top, but that is both a regional preference geared towards the mostly American internet user-base and commercial film-making capacities and a circlejerk written to earn money, not inform. Other parts of the world might not care about music that's apparently well liked in Anglo countries, among music nerds or the public. Also, subjective quality does not guarantee the band being seen as better. For example, the band De/Vision is imo a better Depeche Mode copycat than Camouflage imo, but it's the latter who had commercial success.
  Really, the greatest [x] artist rankings are kinda useless, especially in music - but I'm just rambling.

Bonus points for an ostensibly centrist MLK

people know im a good person when i put Hitler on the front of a "best people ever" book

Don't forget..... the most important ones...... Satoshi Nakamoto & Vitalik Buterin 😤😤

many have described hitler as "the fifth beatle"

the maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry

Don't they publish this every other year or something? I swear I've seen that title and cover forever.

I remember the old edition from 90's, first three were Newton, Jesus and Muhammad. Hitler wasn't even included, only got the note that he should be pretty high but the change he brought was purely evil so fuck him.