Hamas Fails to Make Case That Israel Struck Hospital

Seems pretty conclusive.

Doesn't mean that Israel should continue the genocide, just that Hamas sucks: which we already knew.

Until this apartheid state is dismantled the violence can't stop: both sides are bound to keep fighting with each other.

It's definitely suspicious that there are no munitions remnants available for analysis. You would think there would be something. If there is anything, independent investigators need to be given access. Otherwise, the perception of impropriety will color peoples' analyses.

But the idea this has been "concluded" doesn't seem correct either.

As stated in this article, Al Jazeera, Channel 4, and Forensic Architecture reached conclusions that the air explosion shows the rocket was intercepted and destroyed, not misfired, and there is no causal link between the air explosion and ground explosion at the hospital.

The AP analysis argued against this, but did in fact note this was a possibility. I believe the CNN and others use the same arguments and resources as preliminary OSINT analyses.

Now, GeoConfirmed and other OSINT accounts (Oliver Alexander) are backtracking from their early hypotheses and concluding the Al Jazeera claim is in fact the likely scenario, arguing that the intercepted explosion is too far away from the hospital to be connected. They still think a rocket is the "likely" cause, however.

I wonder if we will ever know what happened for sure, but there is definitely more to this story.

Will this change any Hamas supporter's mind that they are not to be trusted? No, because their minds were made up the moment they started supporting them.

Please don't confuse hamas supporters with supporters of Palestine. Two totally different things.
- Of course!
Funny how anyone who's suspicious of Israel's far-right, militaristic government is a "Hamas supporter".
- Found suspicious by who? Dumbasses on the internet? As long as it's the not the government, I have a right to call out BB's dumbassery that sure didn't help this situation.
Yeah, it is nearly impossible to dismantle a belief system like this. Just like it is with extreme (both left and right) political beliefs.

Something something… independent UN and ICC verification… for the billionth time.

Ah, the new York times, known for its journalistic integrity, inspiring such onion headlines as

"It Is Journalism’s Sacred Duty To Endanger The Lives Of As Many Trans People As Possible"

https://www.theonion.com/it-is-journalism-s-sacred-duty-to-endanger-the-lives-of-1850126997

Also well known for being on the right side of history/s https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/iraq-war-media-fail-matt-taibbi-812230/amp/

honestly this comment gives me the same feel as the tankies. There was certainly enough that it was debatable but withing 4 hours it was not "so clear". My issue was with anyone claiming some sort of slam dunk on one party in the short term.
Okay but Obama with Spike Spiegel's hair though.
Grow up. That's how breaking news works, especially in an area with masses of refugees and bombings. People can't calmly investigate facts in Gaza right now. Rumors can get spun out of control. A better picture is only formed several days after an event. That's just the nature of the news everywhere.

And everyone else has failed to make a case it wasn't Israel...

You won't know that if you just read headlines, because headlines misrepresented the actual quotes in the articles....

Edit:

Yep, got a couple examples of headlines misrepresenting quotes...

Weird how many people want different requirements for Palestine and Israel

Well, it does sound like you just read the headlines...
- Cool, then link me an article with a quote from a foreign government/official definitively saying it wasn't Israel, should be easy if I'm wrong. If I'm right you won't be able to.
  Easy peasy
Article offers a well balanced take with multiple viewpoints, but the main topic of concern of the article is Hamas removing the munition from the site which would have been the most definitive way to tell, presumably to prevent further investigation on that front, hence the headline.
Ultimately though I think focusing on this specific event as a rallying cry to advocate for Palestinians is a mistake. There's still a lot we don't know, and sounds like at least a good chance this was an accidental misfire from Islamic Jihad, who even admits in the article to misfires before just saying they didn't do one "this bad" before. If this event keeps getting pushed even as more evidence comes out suggesting misfire, it'll potentially distract from the thousands of other lives that Israel is clearly and demonstrably responsible for taking by making people shut out or disbelieve other claims.
And everyone else has failed to make a case it wasn’t Israel…
This is not how it works. Israel is not guilty until proven otherwise - you have to PROVE that Israel is guilty of this attack in the first place.
- Exactly.
  Same for Palestine.
  Why do you have higher expectations of Hamas than you do of Israel?