YouTube Will Add an AI Slop Button Thanks to Google’s Veo 3
YouTube Will Add an AI Slop Button Thanks to Google’s Veo 3
gizmodo.com
YouTube Will Add an AI Slop Button Thanks to Google’s Veo 3
76 评论
-
-
Oh my, color me surprised /s But maybe the implementation of this will be the final straw for me, and I'll finally be able to commit to degoogling myself and delete my account and every app for good.
Oh, also the irony of a Youtube CEO talking about "a revolution" is not lost on anyone I hope. Eat the rich.
-
Yeah, maybe this will help me detox from my Youtube addiction.
-
-
Damn. I read the headline, and I almost thought it was a "Report AI Slop" button. What a feature that would be!
-
Was still thinking that until I read this comment. Tiktok is unwatchable (I mean more than before even) because of this. Luckily longer videos are still hard to produce with AI
-
That would be all of it.
-
-
"Creators led this revolution"
The same way cows lead a slaughterhouse.
-
No-one knows chicken like chickens!
-
-
Oh boy, a button that generates ai shorts. Combining my 2 least favorite things about YouTube.
-
Buttons and shorts? Yeah, I also like watching bottomless people sometimes.
-
We are not the same, I usually choose to watch people with an excess amount of bottom.
-
-
-
The "Unhook" addon (increasingly required for Youtube now, in my opinion) will still completely block this as it blocks all shorts. Fuck shorts anyway. Also as TechnologyConnections pointed out in a recent video, the subscription feed still and always has completely bypasses Youtube's recommended brainrot anyway and allows you to subscribe to and follow the creators and topics you actually care about. Until we have a viable alternative to Youtube (and hopefully stuff like this will drive that to happen sooner rather than later) the other option is to stick to subscriptions as much as possible and only subscribe to creators that don't abuse this or use shorts at all, preferably.
-
the subscription feed still and always has completely bypasses Youtube’s recommended brainrot anyway
Though they are messing with that too, on mobile there is a "Most Relevant" section on top. Though thankfully they are videos from your subs.
...for now. -
The problem with the subscription feed is that it shows you every channel that you're subscribed to. If I only want to see cooking videos for example, then it has to be through the standard YouTube recommendations page. What it needs is the ability to manually group channels and let us choose which set of channels we want to see.
-
You can create different profiles on FreeTube to do exactly that.
-
-
"That’s right, a one-stop shop for AI slop is incoming", brilliant sentence.
-
I really wish more people would get behind peertube. I also wish some awesome person/s with coding skills could create an app compatible with smartTV's (esp., android).
-
Good news! Framasoft, the Peertube devs, are working on a smart TV app
-
Don't need any coding skills for doing apps. You can do it with a single well constructed prompt (and 400 other prompts trying to fix the initial bugs and all the dozens other bugs introduced prompt after prompt)
-
And it won't scale at all!
Congratulations, you made more AI slop, and the problem is still unsolved 🤣
Current AI solves 0% of difficult programming problems, 0%, it's good at producing the lowest common denominator, protocols are sitting at 99th percentile here. You're not going to be developing anything remotely close to a new, scale able, secure, federated protocol with it.
Nevermind the interoperability, client libraries...etc Or the proofs and protocol documentation. Which exist before the actual code.
-
But then you just dump your black box of combined code, that you don't understand, back in to another prompt and accept all changes with no questions ask. Easy peasy.
-
-
-
YouTube should be fixing their buggy mess of a YouTube app, what a disaster. Every change they make, makes it worse.
-
Too bad this probably still won't drive people to other platforms.
-
Being a monopoly does that, yeah.
-
-
If only NewPipe worked...
-
I've been using reVanced lately. It is a YouTube patcher, not a standalone application, but it's good enough for me https://github.com/ReVanced/revanced-manager/
-
I started using PipePipe, which is a fork of NewPipe that allows for signing into a Google account to authenticate.
I create dummy Google accounts using an old Android phone, as that doesn't require a phone number.
-
Doesn't it? https://newpipe.net/
-
-
"One slop please"
-
Shit
-
You know when gizmodo reads like harddrive that it's some good shit lol
-
Hate slop, but I also approve of anything that makes it easier to wrest IPs away from Hollywood. Feeling conflicted and pessimistic.
76 评论
Why would anyone want to watch AI generated content? What's the point? I get using AI generation as a tool but if there's no human intention behind it, just a pure algorithm, why even bother?
Sometimes I'll watch a video and as soon as I realize the voice is AI generated, I stop watching
This was me once a month but now it's a few times a day.
You already clicked. It doesn't matter anymore.
But why?
Like sure some of the voices are not great but the words being said are the thing I’m interested in and not the person / machine saying the words.
Each to their own and all that, I’m just curious as to why you just stop watching something you were seemingly enjoying.
Art is people making stuff, without the people... it's just stuff.
Can still be very pretty though. I use it to set scenes and show characters for my dungeons and dragons campaign.
Unpopular opinion: the fact that said stuff matches my style / that I like it is what makes art worth anything to me. Being made by a person or a fish or a machine doesnt matter. It's the STUFF I want on my wall or the end table, not the fact that it's tacitly human crafted. Any art I can afford is made by someone who is basically a faceless deal, not someone I know personally (or else the person matters) or someone who is famous (in which the person matters). Ergo... the people don't typically matter.
Im not going to an insane restaurant to fanboy the chef, I'm going to eat the FOOD. If a machine makes it and every single dish is atomically identical, that's fine, as long as it's super tasty.
It's not like you can learn from it (even if the topic is something you'll never use like a 2 hour dissertation on heat pumps or a multi-video series on how an old pinball machine uses only relays to calculate scores).
Why yes, I am subscribed to Technology Connections, how could you tell?
I love heat pumps I love heat pumps I love heat pumps
(I agree! I do love tech connections. Although I'd argue that knowing how heat pumps work can be quite beneficial ^^ at least in my case)
I subscribed to him as well. His Patreon is even better.
Because now there literally will be infinite content for doom scrolling addicts.
There’s an example right in the article.
Historical events portrayed realistically is one.
Which is the second most scary thing AI can do.
The first is realistic portrayal of faked current events.
Although there is nothing realistic about it all. But it satisfies the expectations of someone who doesn't know anything about history.
I've watched some mildly amusing Yeti campfire tutorials that were AI generated.
E.g. https://youtube.com/shorts/H2M0rSW9jhk