‘Blatant aggression’: JD Vance slams Denmark to promote Trump’s Greenland takeover bid

During his visit to Greenland, Vance added, “We can’t just ignore the president’s desires.”

yes. yes we fucking well can.

You can't JD. The rest of us absolutely can.
- He is a slave to that POTUSsy

Declarations of war are formal documents delivered by a foreign minister to an ambassador and are legally binding.
Some prat running their mouth, even if they’re a senior governmental official, has never been a legal declaration of war.
Yes!
I feel it comes down to money as always. The modern world works on markets, not nationalism.
It's why these ideas get floated around without consequence. Business just ignores the ideas it till it impacts the bottom line. Then they make whatever changes are best for them, very seldom are the changes made for principles or morals.
The US knows this. They attack Canada without declaring war to convince businesses to invest in the US instead of Canada. It works for the most part, tragically.
"Everybody hated the Nazis but not enough had a problem doing business with them though."
Edit: Canada will be alright. We're bringing down interprovincial trade batriers. It'll help gets projects done all across the country. Out word is gold as well. We keep our promises, unlike the US who don't realise how destructive breaking all their agreements really is. It makes sense to invest in Canada. We just have to show that to the rest of the world.

Vance is full of shit.

Denmark has kept it's promises and patrolled the entire area for all these years. The latest encounter with Russians was by he Danish patrols. They all were.

USA used to have 6000 soldiers on Greenland. Today they have 150. USA has done jack shit with their military bases on Greenland, except for leaving behind environmental disasters, which Denmark has paid for cleaning up.

Is Denmark not treating the Greenlanders right? Maybe, but how will they be treated by USA? Will they even get to vote in American elections? I fucking doubt it.

Not only that, iirc Denmark offered the US a much larger military presence on Greenland, and the Trump admin denied the offer. I think it even included some mining claims. Still not enough. It really seems like the goal is nothing short of full territorial control. But the reason appears murky. Like if it is saftey, why is larger military presence not enough? It really does appear to be a lie.
- Because the Danish administration 20 or 100 years from now could easily change their mind. For safety, you want to have full control.
how will they be treated by USA?
Women's reproductive healthcare ban, end of universal healthcare, elimination of science in schools, state religion, child labor, concentration camps for protesters, end of free speech, slave labor wages and rigged elections.

Denmark has a movement to buy California from America. As an American citizen, I fully endorse this concept.

LOL. California is more likely to buy Denmark than the other way around.
- Denmark can pay the USA in ozempic pills.

SLAAAAAAMS

I'm so Fing sick of every news article says "SLAMS" JFC
- I hate the ones that say "Claps back at..."

What in the fuck even is this Greenland thing? There is obviously no way that any one would have ever taken it seriously so why even put it out there?

Is this reaction fog of war they are injecting into the media narrative to obscure the fact they are running disappearance/ concentration camps?

Sometimes I think they’re trying to scare up NATO spending, but they’re doing it in an entirely pyrrhic way.
Mostly I think they have a 1970 RISK level understanding of the world and do not understand how alliances work.
They talk about geopolitics like they’re 14 and think everything is zero sum, lacking even the most basic elements is game theory and economics.
- They talk about geopolitics like they’re 14 and think everything is zero sum, lacking even the most basic elements is game theory and economics.
  Yeah. I know some of those types. The almost always misunderstand the moment and deploy some of the worst strategies.
- Europeans are finally increasing their defense spending. Asking them nicely for the last decade didn’t work.
It's between a potential trade route for the US and Russia as well as an increasingly important route for military vessels and eventually high amounts of trade as populations move further north due to global warming, which they obviously believe in when they plan their own future actions.
- Hmm. You think this might be an extension of Russian foreign policy?
  So instead of "What does Trump gain from this?" we should be asking "What does Putin gain from this?".
  That is one of those things I've never really been able to fully wire in. Why is Trump seemingly so perpetually willing to enact (and somehow aware of) Putin's will? Its totally out of character for him. Trump is incredibly predictable. Maybe one of the most predictable people there is. Whatever serves Trump, most directly and completely, whatever elevates him above all others; this is the thing he will do.
  And yet he always defers to Putin. I've never fully understood this. I know we can all speculate, blah blah, peepee tapes, blah blah we all hate Trump sure.
  But it still doesn't match. He's a guy who doesn't keep promises. He doesn't pay his debts. He'll lie, cheat, steal, anything, to set the situation up to serve himself. Why is he keeping this one? Why is his loyalty/ sycophantry to Putin beyond reproach?
'There is obviously no way that any one would have ever taken it setiously' is exactly how we came into the shitstorm that is the trump administration. Twice. The public needs to hold politicians to their word, no matter how absurd. If they can't be serious when addressing their base, how serious can we expect them to be when dealing with allies and adversaries?
'Bro, your wife is so hot I dream of sleeping with her all the time'
'Hitler wasn't so bad, he was acting in the interest of the country'
When does it end? Both those statements deserve a swift punch in the face.
- No one is rejecting the seriousness of whats going on. If you dont get that, then spend more time developing context for the comments you are responding to.
Panama. Greenland. Canada. Gaza.
It truly feels like Trump is desperate to cement his place in history with a territorial expansion. I honestly think these seeds were planted by Putin to destabilize Euro-American (and NATO) relations.
- I mean look, it's so disgusting, but because of Bidens failure to restrain Israel, the political structure for whatever ambitions he has in Gaza have weight.
  But Canada? Greenland? Panama?
  Look maybe he could strong arm Panama. If it was all he did with the US military in it's entirety.
  But Canada? Like, give me a break. Even with the entirety of the US military they couldn't do this. And what the world's going to just stand by?
  And Greenland? why? For what purpose? To what ends?
  It really doesn't make sense.
  Except maybe what you are saying.
  Is he trying to copy Putin?
Unfortunately, it appears as though Trump is very serious. It's terrifying.
Greenland is a strategic position, especially with glaciers melting off.
Russia wants his puppet to take it over for them.

Typical bully behavior, beat up on the small kid, who cant defend himself. We used to be the big kid who stood up for the smaller bullied kids. Now we're the bully. It makes me sick.