Trickflation
Trickflation
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/27121839
You're viewing a single thread.
173 comments
-
Fun fact, a taller, narrower can uses more aluminum!
-
It's definitely more surface area per volume, but a 200 vs 202 lid and a smaller hermetic seal cancels some of those losses. Sidewall is cheap aluminum wise, but you're likely right in that it's a little more aluminum. Definitely costs more to make since they do fill a little slower.
Also fuck coke, what a bunch of assholes
-
The larger diameter of the original can plus the angled transition at either end probably means same surface area of aluminium. Small diameter differences make larger circumferential changes.
-
They do, but overall the can end (lid) is a LOT more aluminum than you expect and the whole rest of it isn't as much as you expect.
So a little less lid is worth a fair bit more sidewall in terms of weight of aluminum
-
Since they apparently have the same volume, could one of you be a hero and steal one of each and weigh them?
-
If I still worked where I used to I 100% would. No cans around me now :(
-
-
Aren't these the same lid?
-
I guess I'm a bit rusty, so I am not sure at 355ml and the skinny profile if you can get a 202 end can, or have to use a 200
Hard to tell if it's sleek or slim
Edit: Actually no, that's a 200 not a 202. Look at the profile around the tab.
-
They look so similar hard for me to tell
-
Look at the indent around the opening. On the shorter can it goes from wide to narrow at the back of the tab. It's more of a straight line on the taller can
-
Right
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I thought it was the other way around. The thickest part of the can is the top, followed by the bottom. The sides are much thinner. I thought the reasoning behind switching to tall and narrow cans with the same internal volume was to save on aluminium.
-
The top seems to be the same size, the old one just bulges more while the new one almost goes straight down.
-
Tops are pretty much standars size on all cans I'm pretty sure. So that part should be constant.
-
That looks like a 202 vs a 200 can end, so a "sleek" not a "slim" (red bull can is slim)
The sleek can is 355 ml and uses a 200 end.
As for which uses more aluminum.... Good question. It's probably close
-
-
Someone should weigh both and see!
-
The only real way, speculation by photo is not that great. They also could have made the metal thinner.
-
-
Well, I assumed constant thickness, so if that's true, you might be right.
-
you could use your coke scale to confirm
-
-
The tops are the same on both
-
-
173 comments