2y ago

Stew Peters Advocates for a Violent Overthrow of the Government

www.rightwingwatch.org

Stew Peters Advocates for a Violent Overthrow of the Government | Right Wing Watch

Why this is important:

Stew Peters is a far-right virulently anti-LGBTQ bigot who regularly uses his nightly “The Stew Peters Show” program, speeches, and social media accounts to promote white nationalists and antisemites and to spread wild conspiracy theories, bigotry, and calls for violence. Despite his bigoted views and unhinged rhetoric, Peters regularly manages to get Republican leaders, elected officials, and candidates for office to appear on his program. In addition, Peters has participated in ReAwaken America events alongside various Trump insiders and members of the Trump family.

43 comments

I thought advocating the violent overthrow of the government was illegal? I have questions. It floors me when one side refuses to use the existing mechanisms to combat the illegality of the other as if it would be ill-mannered of them to quash murderous rhetoric.
They say it takes two sides to fight, and that's true. You have to cooperate with someone looking for a fight. But you also have to cooperate with someone trying to walk all over you. Fascism must be killed in the crib. We've seen what happens when you don't.
There is a war happening right now over the soul and future of America and one side has no idea it's even fighting. I love this country too much to see it fall to the wrong side of history. But things are looking bleak.
- It really depends how you say it. You can say things in such a way where you're covered under free speech. For example
  Telling a mob to "go over there and attack all the dirty [racial group] to cleanse our city" is 100% incitement and you will go to jail, regardless of who you are
  But going onto your podcast and saying "man, I really think the best thing for our society would be to get rid of all the dirty [racial group] so we can be cleansed" is protected under free speech
  It really depends on what the man who's the topic of the OP said, to determine whether he said something illegal or not.
  Keep in mind they tried to fight fascism in Germany too. They sent Hitler to jail. Eventually he got broken out and he became dictator shortly after. I think ultimately speech and hatred is not the problem - it's the symptom. As long as we have people suffering under an economic system that doesn't provide for all their basic needs, we leave the door open for people like Trump or Prager to sneak in and offer a solution.
  Can censor, arrest, and deplatform all you want, won't make a difference.
  
  Telling a mob to “go over there and attack all the dirty [racial group] to cleanse our city” is 100% incitement and you will go to jail, regardless of who you are
  I'm very, very much not convinced that last part is true.
  
  I suppose I just don’t appreciate the nuance between “go do evil“ and “I think people should go do evil“.
  
  My worry is that if we send trump to jail for any one of his felonies, he will get out somehow and lead a coup.
Peters quote from the article:
“I think that these people need to be replaced,” Peters said regarding elected and government officials. “They need to be replaced, but by means of elections is not going to happen. So what we need to do is what the Constitution directs us to do, which is to abolish and tear down and dismantle a government that has become rogue and oppressive to our individual God-given, inherent rights. And then we need to replace it with a form of government that’s representative of the people.”
“If we do that,” Peters continued, “none of this song and pony show dance fake circus nonsense would even be in existence because the people that are perpetuating this and have openly declared war on the American people will be held to extreme accountability, and they will be gone.”
“It’s all fake. It’s all rigged. It’s all set up,” Peters declared. “It’s part of a Marxist coup. It’s the ushering in an authoritarian, oppressive one-world government and the only thing stopping them from completing it is 450 million guns in this country, so now we just need to talk about what to do with those guns and how to use them.”
"Marxist coup"? For some of us words mean things and we know those meanings. For the rabid right, certain words are divorced from meaning and made into Pavlovian triggers for fear and revulsion.
Words like socialism, Marxism, groomer, woke, and even names like AOC and Hillary.
Edited to add...
This is more dangerous rhetoric and it continues to escalate. I find it especially dangerous because parts of it appeal to anyone feeling disenfranchised and poorly represented.
Would I like to replace corrupt, corporate bootlickers in congress with people who are honest and want to make things better? Absolutely but through legitimate means. I feel dirty and 🤢 having any views even slightly agreement with this shitstain because this guy is clearly a fascist piece of shit (wait... that's redundant) and he can and should go fuck himself.
But I genuinely fear his rhetoric may entice those who are less woke (in the good sense of the word) and who are poorly inoculated against rhetorical manipulation and ignorant of the history of fascism.
Hopefully the Trump era left no fence sitters in the US and perhaps younger generations mostly reject this hateful bullshit. At the same time I feel we aren't out of the woods yet as far as rising fascism goes.
- Call him what he is: stochastic terrorist.
Isn’t this like treason?
- By the common definition? Yes, for sure. But not by the legal definition. Per Article III Section 3 of the constitution:
  Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
  This falls more under the category of Sedition.
  The federal crime of advocacy of insurrection against the government...
  
  Thanks for clearing this up!
- I may have committed some light treason.
  
  To the gallows!
- It's only treason if you lose.
Bro really thinks people on the left don't have guns lol
- Imagine the outside of a planned parenthood, and add in a group of people screaming at anyone who even glances in it's direction. Throw in signs about how you're going to hell.
  Now imagine all of their faces, when a van pulls up, and three large bearded gentlemen hop out, basically looking like a private military company, rifles slung and sidearm strapped, and they help a young woman out and walk her to the door.
  And hear the silence when only minutes before, screams of hate filled the air.
  No one dares to speak up, because their brains have broken at the sight of people with guns HELPING someone like THAT
  It's priceless.
  
  That's wild.
- Yep, you can support both gun ownership and gun control at the same time.
- Ukraine is showing us you just need drones and creativity
  
  The Syrian rebels took out a Russian airbase using nothing but gliders made of balsa wood strapped with improvised explosives and/or incendiaries.
  Took out a multi-million dollar airbase with a few hundred dollars worth of materials.
  
  Human ingenuity is incredible.
Despite his bigoted views and unhinged rhetoric, Peters regularly manages to get Republican leaders, elected officials, and candidates for office to appear on his program.
More likely just because of it.
I advocate for a violent overthrow of Stu piders.
It’s true the folks lying about the government and want to take it down are the criminals.
Been that way for a while.
He's another Russian stooge. So sad.

43 comments