⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ there are many issues to fix

⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ Impossibly perfect, can never be achieved

⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ This uber driver should be executed in the street

At least it's honest in how it utterly destroys the service being reviewed

This style of star rating is so common but so unintuitive. Hate it.

It's because it's devised by business school idiots who never had a course with something like a 47% class average that gets curved up.
- Damn, I've almost only had those :(
- Man I hate that shit, it's so nerve wracking

The only time I've given less than a 5 star to a Lyft driver homeboy was driving like a maniac on i80 while talking to me about how excited he was to move to Clearwater and then answered a call from his girlfriend and had a very sexually explicit conversation with her.

I'd give six stars if I could, dudes rock
- Life is short. Live fast die young, yolo, etc
Yeah every worker I have to review gets 5 star rating unless they like, spit in my face idk
I also don't report mistakes or get refunds unless it's like, I paid and got close to nothing
- I undersold the "driving like a maniac" it was the least safe I've ever felt in an Lyft and I'd been in one with broken seatbelts lol.
Next time threaten a 1 star review if they don't let you join in

I'd identify something about the fabric or the weave or else the people doing the laundry will get blamed somehow

This is how most companies take customer surveys, they just don’t say it openly, it’s incredibly stupid

Someone would literally have to shoot me in the kneecap to make me leave a less than perfect review. You can't trick me in to giving management an excuse to fire someone. It's so frustrating. Just pitting the little people against each other.
- It’s so stupid though because if I were developing a customer survey system, I would automatically throw out all-5-star reviews because they’re very clearly fake and/or worthless. Which makes lots of people think you have to throw in a couple 4 stars so it looks real.
At one of my old jobs, the yearly review system for employees consisted of different categories like communication, finishing assigned tasks in time, etc. on a scale of 1 to 5.
Supervisors were forbidden from giving any worker a 5 in any category because "there's always room for improvement." I always thought it was horseshit because what's even the point of having a 5 in the first place?
- That’s dumb as shit but is also how I internally think of rating things, on a 5 star scale a true 5 is basically unachievable, it’s kind of an asymptotic approach towards 5, but I round up and call it a 5 at a certain point because otherwise that’s just a 4 point scale

Ah the ol IGN review rating metric.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Eh, it's fine.