The infamous x

Harder to hit when the button is in retrograde too.

On full screen ad everything is clickable except the close button.

Miss and it's opening a link to somewhere you don't want to go, like waking up the fucking google play store you had hibernated for a reason!!!

Theres a special place in hell for mobile ad designers. They're honestly borderline scams at this point.

I remember first getting my S10e and literally every close window button was behind the camera lens. there's no way it wasn't on purpose.

You guys have ads?

perhaps we're too ublock origin-pilled to relate to it

Only thing worse is trying to read the rest of a long YouTube comment without making the app think you want to reply instead of read it.

It's easy, they decided to wrap the button to be tight to the text itself, instead of a small rectangular area, so just aim for one of the letters and hope you didn't accidentally hit the negative space inside one of them.

I'd recommend using uBlock with Firefox and/or Librewolf

uBlock Origin, not the fake uBlock.
What about in app ads? Especially the full screen ads on mobile apps.
- Pi hole
- If you're on Android, go to settings and network, find and enable private dns mode using this host address
  dns.adguard-dns.com
  It should block the majority of ingame/inapp ads, etc
  Edit: Minor Caveat. This isn't fool proof nor is it 100% effective.
  But takes you all of 30 seconds and does not require root permissions, side loaded apps, etc. Its all about the cost benefit ratios.
- I regret to say that I don't know a solution for that; maybe someone here will know better if it's possible to block built-in ads
- NextDNS
- Don't use apps with ads. F-droid exists
- Adaway if your phone is rooted. Pihole or dns adblocking otherwise

Never click the X on ads - it's just click bait. Get a proper adblock instead.

Yup! A lot of them use that X as a link, or a download button. Stupid-ass Musk changed Twitter's logo to an X, and placed it on the top right of embeds, just so he can trick people into clicking it, which links to their website.

ads in Windows

I signed up for Mullvad and it’s worth it. Super cheap and no data tied to you.

I have some bad news for you if you think that simply using a VPN blocks Google and Facebook from being able to identify you.
- My identity comment was tied to Mullvad itself. They don’t require any identifying information when signing up. For the kind of protection you’re talking about, yeah you’re gonna have to go further than just a VPN. Their fingerprinting capabilities are ridiculous.
^x

https://adguard-dns.io/en/public-dns.html

Any ideas for ad blockers that work with a blacklist rather than the contrary?

I don't want to harm the revenue stream of websites I visit unless their ads are unacceptable. So I want it not blocking ads by default. But I'd really like a way to block the website-breaking ads at Fextralife Elden Ring wiki. That shit is crazy; it breaks the search bar until EVERY ad (including autoplay video, even though I disabled autoplay video in settings) has fully loaded.

I do almost all of my browsing with Firefox for Android.

- Marvelous. Thanks. Now I can make those super user-hostile websites usable.
  Edit: wow blocking ads breaks a lot of interactivity on Fextralife though. The programming is weird I guess🤔
I wish I could remember the name of an extension I had on my old computer.
It hid all ads, but also clicked them all in the background. It accomplished 4 goals:
I didn't see the ads
The websites I visited made more money through the clicks
It cost the advertisers money
It made the cost/benefit worse for advertisers since they were paying for clicks without anyone being influenced by the ads
- I've got a feeling that advertising companies have ways to differentiate real and fake clicks. Best case scenario, they wouldn't count those. Worst case scenario, they could notice that too many clicks are fake and revoke the monetization for a website.
  If captchas exist, surely they can use similar methods to catch ad cheats like that.
  This is older, and not quite the same but back when I was into private Ragnarok Online servers, it was pretty well-known among server admins that you couldn't ask people to click your ads. Either because you asked, either because they noticed unusual activity, Google would demonetize the ads pretty quickly.
I don’t want to harm the revenue stream of websites
Perhaps if a product cannot survive without ads it has grown too large or just isn't that necessary? I too could be making extra by creating content and throwing ads on it, but it's not ethical so I don't. Humanity should always strive towards a utopia and a utopian society has zero ads.
- Servers and bandwidth aren't free. Someone needs to pay for it. There are roughly seven ways to fund a website:
  Complete volunteering, and maintainer pays all fees out of pocket. Only makes sense for very small projects, or when the maintainer is rich and has a great deal of passion or otherwise self-interest in the project.
  Strictly fund the website with donations. That's more or less how Wikipedia works. It can be hard to make ends meet, and it typically only works if your website basically offers community service like a charity or if you have very passionate users.
  Freemium model: most users are just leeches and are subsidized by the few who pay for the premium version. This is more or less how free-to-play video games work, and some newspapers survive this way. It can be difficult to convince people.
  Members only: you literally cannot use the website unless you pay. A lot of SAAS websites, especially for businesses, work this way. It can be a hard sell for a lot of service categories.
  Ads. Sometimes combined with a freemium model, where you can pay to remove the ads. YouTube works this way.
  Sell user data to advertisers or more sinister entities. Only possible if you have valuable user data to sell. Most social networks get a significant portion of their revenue from this method, but they typically combine it with ads.
  Use venture capital to disturb an existing market at a loss, get massive mindshare and maybe even kill existing competition, and jack the prices up to repay your debts and turn a profit once you have customers and the market is more favourable. Airbnb works this way.
  What would you do for review sites? News sites? Video game wikis?
  Wouldn't it suck if a wiki for an old game was just gone because there aren't many players anymore, and now you just can't access the info in it?
..