Reuters is a far-right newspaper with views barely distinguishable from Breitbart but for some reason are treated as respectable
The New York Crimes and Washington Post have more credibility than the dogshit rag that is Reuters
I remember reading something from Reuters for a school assignment back in high school over 10 years ago and going “Wait, this is a reputable news source? This is Fox News filth.” and if anything I was being too kind
At least they bothered to add a fucking author’s name. Publishing an article with no author attached is fucking cowardice and usually should mean you assume that article is lying through its teeth. I’m looking at you Associated Press.
Reuters, The Economist, and AP are my most hated news organizations. I truly do not understand why they’re upheld as reputable. Like, at least NYT has a few good journalists that sometimes get stuff through. Those 3 are absolute rags.
-Balanced? One headline per worldview, what could be more fair?
-Reliable? Mainstream Media covering up the atrocities of those in power? That's exactly what I expect from them and they do not disappoint!
-Fact-based? You can see it in action here! They start with a fact to base their story on, then corrupt it irrevocably with journalistic tricks and sophistry until it misrepresents reality entirely
So I think someone should apologize to media bias chart..."