Skip Navigation
Meta's news ban is preventing Canadians from sharing vital information about the wildfires ripping through western Canada
  • The Government telling meta and Google they'd have to pay to link has led to this entirely predictable result, and the companies said they would block links since very early on in the process. Independent experts (e.g., Michael Geist) also said that C18 was a bad idea.

    It's ridiculous to complain about someone complying with laws that you (the government) drafted and passed.

  • ‘Disaster’: warning for democracy as experts condemn Meta over Canada news ban
  • I am no fan of Meta.

    But..

    This is maybe 10% meta's fault, but 90% the government's.

    The law they passed was completely ridiculous in that it would force meta and others to pay Canadian news companies for each link posted. A concept that anyone with an understanding of either the internet or economics could have told you would lead to the situation we are in now.

    Any business would react the same way and the have publicly been saying this is what they would do since the law was in the planning/proposal phase. Experts have likewise predicted this. But the government here seemed to think that nobody would dare defy the 'mighty' Canadian government. The fact is we have a smaller population than California alone, and it's not worth it for meta or other companies to comply with this law.

    It's almost like the feds here watched the "Canada wants some of that internet money" episode of South Park and thought "great idea!!"

  • InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)YA
    yaksmen @lemmy.world
    Posts 0
    Comments 8