Skip Navigation
What's your hottest character idea that you didn't get to play (long enough)?
  • In the first campaign I ever played in, I ran a necromancy wizard that was neutral good.

    Basically, he grew up a hermit and has zero awareness of the taboos surrounding his school of magic. However, because of his alignment, he has a very different approach to how he uses his magic.

    Whenever he has to raise undead to fight for him, he does it by asking for their aid rather than outright raising them. He approaches the practice more as a way to preserve the lives of the living rather than a way of amassing servants or power. When he no longer needs their help, he thanks them and tries to make sure they either return to their resting place or are given a proper burial.

    His overarching goal is to ensure everyone lives a long, full life and wishes to find a way to resurrect others in the way other classes can to help achieve that goal.

    Didn't get to play him for long since the group kinda fell apart

  • This went poorly
  • Reminds me of how I introduced a bag of devouring at a defective magic item shop and the party bought it anyways.

    I should have learned my lesson after the last bag incident

  • Trump's Truth Social loses $4 billion in value in one week, while revealing wider loss
  • Then let's assume the people in charge want Trump back in office. Wouldn't it just make more sense to make political contributions to him and others sympathetic to his platform? That carries less reputational risk than investing in a known to fail platform.

    Plus it's worth mentioning that those are assets under management ; they have to answer to their investors for every time they allocate. They can't just freely swing that around like most people think

  • Trump's Truth Social loses $4 billion in value in one week, while revealing wider loss
  • Bud, I know it's pretty easy to jump down into conspiratorial rabbit holes whenever talking about Blackrock, vanguard, etc but let me ask you this:

    Which sounds like a more solid plan? Investing in a platform that was dead in the water from the start, with no financial future. Or just donating to a bunch of politicians that are okay with your business practices?

    I'm not saying they aren't causing a good bit of harm but you don't become the largest investment management firm on the planet by being that stupid

  • Quest 1 becomes near-E-waste Apr 30
  • I can't speak for the quest directly but I've used programs like sidequest to load homebrew games onto my quest 2. It's also really easy to do so I don't think they're quote going to be e waste yet

  • What brought you over to Lemmy?
  • There was a subreddit I used to be very active on that practically got nuked by the company during the protests. They kicked all of the mods off and replaced it with their own, leaving a huge mess behind.

    A good number of them started over from scratch on Lemmy and I followed them here. Haven't really looked back since

  • Please chill
  • I’ll admit that I’ve had my players do those kind of rolls from time to time. It’s usually either when they’re doing something with no consequences that can have a comedic moment or they choose to do something so far in left field that I almost feel the need to ask them to roll.

    All in all though those dumb rolls have led to a lot of comedic moments that my players enjoy so I think a big part is how it’s used

  • Removed
    GTA V source code has been leaked.
  • Unless his attitude and stance changes, there’s not a single red team that I could see taking him. You can’t just throw someone who wants to be a criminal into pentesting and think it’ll go well

  • Removed
    GTA V source code has been leaked.
  • He’s talented, but the problem is jobs like pen testing require a LOT of trust to work in. So far this guy has said and shown that he intents on staying in cybercrime rather than doing legitimate work.

    As it stands, given how he’s acted, I can’t see a single company that would let him pen test their systems or a red team that would take that risk to their reputation.

  • God Bless Us,
  • Having a large number of kids was really common during that time period. Back then kids often helped around the house and on the farm; plus it was pretty common for kids to die before reaching adulthood which is another reason for the large number.

    It wasn’t until around the 40s or 50s that the 1-3 kids per family became common

  • party quickly learned attacking the rug only made things worse

    This happened a fair bit ago but haven't had the chance to share it with the reddit fiasco. Hopefully some people enjoy the campaign memes here!

    3
    InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)RI
    rickrolled767 @ttrpg.network
    Posts 4
    Comments 31