Oh no! Family thinks it's drugs money and gives it to the police!
Monkey paw strikes again.
Of course, happy to expand on my point!
I mean, so far as I know, liberal is only a pejorative in the USA. Not heard it used that way in other political systems, likely because of the reasons you mentioned.
This comment is like reading a Zen Koan.
Generally not what happens, I can only think of one modern style democracy that does that.
"Why anyone would think otherwise is beyond me" - every American voter is seems.
Are you suggesting the relevance or application of the constitution has changed over time?
I fear you can get lynched for that kind of talk
Simple answer but... Small business
Plenty of them still about in most places
Interesting fact about the pentagon.
It was made that shape because the land set aside for it was that shape.
After the designs were mostly done, they changed the site but kept the design mostly the same, only making it more regularly sized on the sides.
Requiring the efforts of Mathematicians and mechanics spending millions of man hours!
Degrading to the valid argument. Unless it's satire, then it's funny hyperbole 😁
Yup.
They told me I could choose between ads and a 35% price rise.
I replied "I have a better idea"
Can honestly say I've not missed out watching anything I wanted to watch
Just because you think you know better than them who they are, doesn't mean you're right.
Femboys are empirical evidence to the contrary
Promise not to hold you responsible for all the recent stuff
That would very much depend on whether you work for Boeing or not, I guess.
Okay, yeah. If it's in bad faith I totally agree.
Still, I do have to wonder why some genocides are more important to people than others. There's a genuine question there too
Kinda misses the point, no?
The question needs an answer, even if the person asking also has their own questions to answer.
So like the English with our English heritage?
The internet has made a lot of people armchair experts happy to offer their perspective with a degree of certainty, without doing the work to identify gaps in their knowledge. Often the mark of genuine expertise is knowing the limitations of your knowledge.
This isn't a social media thing exclusively of course, I've met it in the real world too.
When I worked as a repair technician, members of the public would ask me for my diagnosis of faults and then debate them with me.
I've dedicated the second half of my life to understanding people and how they work, in this field it's even worse because everyone has opinions on that topic!
And yet my friend who has a physics PhD doesn't endure people explaining why his theories about battery tech are incorrect because of an article they read or an anecdote from someone's past.
So I'm curious, do some fields experience this more than others?
If you have a field of expertise do you find people love to debate you without taking into account the gulf of awareness, skills and knowledge?
To elaborate...
The UK has always favoured centrist governments, when the Conservatives get too nasty they're unpopular, Labour only wins when they do Thatcherism-Light, etc.
We now have a choice between a relatively moderate conservative prime minister, who is admittedly being dragged to the right by his party and others, and a relatively moderate labour leader who has purged the extremism from his party to pursue a centre left agenda.
In both cases, what I see are two people who believe in principles, compromise them for politics sake, who are fundamentally in favour of the status quo rather than revolution and prefer to win through being seen as competent.
Fine, this has been the case most of my life. It's why I've been relaxed about politics. Whatever happens, things will largely stay the same with small incremental changes.
The difference now is about the fringes. Not a day goes by recently without a headline grabbing policy coming out of the government press machine making a virtue out of being a bunch of ****s.
The ridiculous culture war stuff, the politicisation of fear and anger. Pointless, ineffective policies that are intended to win a few votes regardless of the harm they cause. Sickening stuff a lot of the time, born out of selfishness of behalf of those in power to try and keep that power and get as much as they can for themselves. It feels like they be the ones looting the Titanic as it sank.
So whilst Labour are not likely to usher in a revolution, a golden age or fix things overnight. I'll take centrist middle aged dad running the country if it means an end to this nonsense. An end to a government attacking it's own citizens in the name of defending the people.