It's because China is investing in training new generations of scientists and engineers. And yes, some day they'll probably have some groundbreaking tech like whatever comes after EUV lithography, and the US will be kicking itself for obstructing collaboration
When that time comes, hopefully the Chinese government won't be as obstinate as the US is now (a very low bar to pass)
Carlson’s 1991 Trinity College yearbook lists him as a member of the “Dan White Society” and the “Jesse Helms Foundation.” White is the person who assassinated Harvey Milk, the groundbreaking out politician who urged gay people to “come out.” Helms, the late Republican senator from North Carolina, was notoriously racist and viciously anti-gay.
This is America.
His agenda is homegrown extremism. Putin's reactionary regime is a natural ally for people like Tucker. But when you Make it sound like Putin is calling all the shots, youre both buying into Russian propaganda and whitewashing American history
The article is a worth a read, answers the question in the first couple paragraphs, and isn't a site flooded with ads. You're just saving people from learning more than the answer to the headline
And here's to the cops of Mississippi
They're chewing their tobacco
As they lock the prison door
And their bellies bounce inside them
When they knock you to the floor
No, they don't like taking prisoners
In their private little wars
And behind their broken badges
There are murderers and more
I'm not posting this to make fun of Mississippi. I just think it's telling that the opposite of "Mississippi Goddam" (Nina Simone civil rights song) is "thank god for Mississippi" (ghoulish joke at the expense of Poor and Black misssissipians)
They take getting caught seriously, not the stuff they get caught at.
Wut. I'm not sure if this is a distinction without a difference, or a subtle distinction that I need a better grasp on continental philosophy to comprehend.
It's like saying a state doesn't take murder seriously - they take getting caught seriously. It's technically true if you parse it a certain way, but ultimately meaningless
this kind of thing is not bad because it endangered people’s lives, it’s bad because it makes them look bad and might impact their exports
Something can be bad for multiple reasons. Also, there's multiple actors here. The operators of the state-owned enterprise have different incentives than the regulators
Don't forget (4) the inevitable yet unpredictable effects of aging on a human in their ninth decade