This is so hilariously backward. Customers are getting what they want, and so is the company. It's the drivers with the problem. Why would a customer stop using the service?
What's flawed about it? If you don't like the deal, don't be a dasher. No one is forced to deliver food for money. No one is being fooled about how little it pays. Y'all act like it's some big secret that the gig isn't great, but that's common knowledge. If no one wanted the gig and all its drawbacks, then they wouldn't sign up for it.
Compelling, except there's no implicit control over what the "luck" brings. I assume it's always positive, but from who's/ what's perspective? Winning the lotto might be lucky, but it could be some other "positive" thing that you don't really care for. Maybe that's a little too "monkey's paw"? I dunno. Just to many variables.
Alright, that tracks. But then how/ why do I see stuff from the other instances (I think that's the right word)? Are they all like different subreddits?
This truck is almost explicitly a fleet vehicle for construction and the like. Pretending encountering this $150,000 work vehicle is a common occurrence is super disingenuous.
If you're gonna be scared of trucks, we least be scared of the ones you actually see.
I still don't get it, personally. I just joined the one I'm on because it was the first one I saw
I have no real understanding of what's going on or how it's didn't from reddit other than one person can't power trip on it.
If a collision is inevitable, then yeah, I wanna be the one that comes out OK. Hopefully, everyone does, but the safety of those in my vehicle is far more important than anyone else to me. I'll take something that protects the inside at the expense of the outside every day of the week. That's somehow a bad thing?
Why? Who's holding a gun to the head of these drivers and forcing them to work for this gig? The onus isn't on the customers, it's on the drivers.