Some scientists and theorists believe that the reactor is extremely advanced, suggesting that highly intelligent beings existed 2 billion years ago. While another hypothesis is that it was constructed by prehistoric human civilization (like described in the Silurian Hypothesis by NASA scientists) using techniques that were lost to subsequent humans.
However, most of the mainstream researchers believe that Oklo is the world’s only identified naturally occurring reactor which was created by accident. As scientists Norman Schwers and John A. Miller from Sandia National Laboratories explain in a 2017 paper, the concept of a naturally occurring reactor was originally documented in 1956 using reactor theory or the infinite multiplication constants.
Ok so i am new to this https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/really-build-immunity-iocane-powder-162927341.html?guccounter=1
DOES SOMETHING LIKE IOCANE EXIST? As previously noted, iocane is a made-up poison, invented for the story.
Like iocane, arsenic doesn’t have a taste or an odor, and it can be dissolved in liquid.
The major difference between arsenic and iocane powder — and it is admittedly a big difference — is that arsenic doesn’t kill immediately.
When it comes to arsenic, our real-world allegory of iocane powder, it doesn’t appear as though you can build up a tolerance through increasing low-level exposure.
A community located in a village in the Andes appears to have adapted a genetic tolerance to arsenic over the course of thousands of years
Yo op! I found this in my saved items... 4 weeks later: did you get it fixed? Hope so!
Friendly reminder not to pre-order!
Ok so i think it is cool everybody answers the question...
But why PenisWenisGenius? Why do you need this information?
I am truly sorry to inform you that you f*cked up the text on your meme! Just fyi!
Again, i have no idea what you are saying... There is lots to learn!
Dear all!
As I am quite new to all this, maybe a very noob question. I prompted bing, bard and chatgpt (3.5) with the same question. Bing just straight up answered different questions but delivered sources I could check. Bard and chatgpt answered my questions but just invented (all) sources. Just made up randomised authors and title names. Bard delivered links to said scientific articles, but when you followed the link the articles in question were completely different.
-
How can you I trust delivered results, when the sources are made up?
-
And also: why? Why didn't it say for example there are no meta-analyses?
-
is it better in the payed version from chatgpt?
Thanks in advance!
Question: can we set up something similar as the Reddit Switch Spines community? I truly like my colourful spines but I have no idea how to get this thing started!
Btw posting this from Lemmy on kbin feels old school cool
Hi guys,
So I maybe have a major noob question. But with threads and meta joining the fediverse, and instances should (could/shouldn't/will or will not) defederate from them... Is there something that I, as a simple user, can of should do?
Update Ok so lemmy.world just posted this https://lemmy.world/post/1274909
Saying they are going to wait and see.
To be honest, I don't trust meta for one bit so maybe it is time to switch server
Update 2 I liked this post https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html
Update 3 Apparently I can't migrate my account (yet)...