Unpopular opinion incoming:

You know when you were playing hide and seek, found the perfect hiding place, and you reject anyone else who tries to hide in that place?

DON'T TELL ANYONE ABOUT ADBLOCKERS!

Seriously, corpos will crack down hard. I mean, real hard on adblockers. This is an arms race that corporations have not yet realised because not enough people are using ad blockers. However, if more and more people are using it, then corporations will also be trying to catch up and that is something they will win because of greater resources.

This will be like with VPN; as many VPN IP addresses have been flagged and blocked as the service became more popular. And some of these VPNs have not updated the IP addresses making access to many websites nigh impossible or awkward-- unless you want to trawl through countless addresses. I'm afraid the same thing will happen with adblockers. This is something that open source adblockers could not easily win-- if they could win.

Maybe in the past it's possible to live forever by renting, but that's not the case anymore.

I wonder if it's a spectrum. I am probably the same as you, but I am surprised when others mentioned about their inner monologue being constant-- many of which are negative-- and how to "turn it off" when it becomes too toxic. I have never really gotten negative inner monologues.

Nonetheless, the post made me think that this may explain why I am pretty forgetful. I don't speak to myself to remember something in inner monologue/first person.

I think there is anti-Western psyops (I don't want to say Russian or Chinese because who knows if either or both are doing it) going on with emphasising not to vote Biden and keep calling him "genocide Joe", even though Trump is far more supportive of Israel in his last presidency. I have seen the rhetoric of genocide Joe and "left should not vote he him for supporting Israel" even in some seemingly centrist comments, which happens to be pro-Russia at the same time and those commenters are suspiciously new, or the account had aged out only to post months later after signing up. This is just too much of a coincidence.

If this is a Russian psyops, it is obvious why because Trump is ideologically (perhaps financially) aligned with Putin, and Trump being back into the White House will gut the aid to Ukraine. Trump himself said he will force Ukraine to accept the territorial losses from the invasion and threatened to pull US out of NATO.

Anyone who keeps saying not to vote for Biden because of his support for Israel is either psyops agent or fell into the propaganda, which in turn is only helping the disinformation propagandists.

You know, this makes me think why arranged/forced marriages were the norm in the past. Dating is hard by its nature even with today's "convenience" of digital technology.

The difference is that the law comes from an infallible authority - the government, while God who created all things including morality is infallible.

So to you, god being infallible and orders segregation, you'd do it?

How do you know God didn't punish Lot's daughters? The argument from silence won't cut it here.

Don't throw stones into glasshouses. You are the one who clearly avoid questions. Will you approve of segregation if your god states it? And what is so bad with the fruit of knowledge? You still haven't answered that rhetorical question because you probably know already the answer. Silence won't cut here.

When you die, God judges you, and He judges you perfectly. The ones who don't get punished aren't simply waived away.

So those who weren't punished are punished later. Sounds like selective justice.

It's because their punishment has already been paid for by them through Jesus Christ's suffering on the cross, Whom they repented to and embraced. And that offer is open to everyone, including you.

This is something that Christians could never explain. How does sacrificing your own flesh and blood (even early Christians argued whether or not Jesus is Yahweh's own physical manifestation, or his own offspring, or both) cleanse the sins of the world? Even after Jesus died, people still carried on with their lives. And someone already explained, the accounts of Jesus were written 30 to 600 years of his claimed death. And in that time, dozens of books about Jesus and Christianity were written but the rest were discarded and cherry picked four or five books. If these books are all true then there is no reason for them not to be compiled at all together.

If your god is omnipotent and omniscient, why sacrifice a human being to cleanse the world of sins? An all-powerful god would just snap his finger and make all sins forgiven. But instead a human had to be sacrificed-- and his own flesh and blood at that. Why worship such a sadistic god? That being said, many scholars believe that Yahweh is a god of war from the pantheon of Levantine gods. Which explains the violent accounts. And that implies the true nature of monotheist dogma of Abrahamic religions. Reckon this is what the Bible means from withholding the fruit of knowledge?

God could have punished Lot's daughters though.

So let me get this straight, he punishes those who commit sins according to his own judgement, but some who commit sins are not punished? Does Yahweh have concrete rule he follows or not? Why do some get punished while others don't? And why are some commandments just there-- like not allowing to eat the fruit of knowledge. Everyone like knowledge, right? What is so bad about knowledge that Yahweh does not want Adam and Eve to eat the fruit containing the knowledge? Which goes back to the point whether Yahweh is omniscient and yet does nothing, or he's not omniscient at all. Or rather, he's omniscient but tempts people into commiting so-called "sins" knowing the person will disobey, and then judge later on despite knowing what the person will do prior to doing it. Interesting. Sounds like this god is a mad scientist experimenting on people.

Edit: I forgot to address.

Also, don't see what segregation has to do with it. God never instituted that.

No. But from the beginning you essentially posits to follow the rules no matter what-- that obeying god is akin to obeying a parent. And doing means one is good at obeying the law too. If god wants segregating other human beings according to race, would you follow it?

BoS has always been cultish but they're not so much unlike what was portrayed in the show.

So you tolerate rules that are not only nonsensical, but also makes everyone's lives harder? And that everyone should put up with it simply because they're rules no matter how arbitrary? Segregation between black and white people was also a rule, you know?

Moreover, nowhere did you and I mention Yahweh prevented any disobedience. In any case, your comment acknowledges that Yahweh allows disobedience but has the power to prevent it. So, either he is omniscient and could prevent future actions but does nothing, or he isn't omniscient at all.

Oh no, I am talking about the Fallout TV series in general that I don't mind the new lore additions and changes!

And yet Lot's children were spared by Yahweh and let a man be raped.

Lot's wife played games with stupid rules that is.

As far as I know, he was a player if you know what I mean. Which is not as bad as being a pedophile.

You put words into my mouth. I don't mind some of the "alterations" but as with any creative works and drama-- if it works, it works. People complained of the Brotherhood's cultish acts which deviated from the videogame, but it is in line with real life drama where any organisations do not stay the same overtime. For example, the Catholic Church of today is not the same as the Catholic Church 500 years ago.

The consolation after killing childrenfor the sins of their parents is that they go to heaven. Great.

Lot's wife turning into a salt of pillar is not justified though...leading to his daughters raping him and committing incest to "repopulate the earth". That would not have happened had the wife not turn into a salt of pillar, simply for arbitrary command given by Yahweh that doesn't make sense. What a wholesome story.

It's not like unquestioning obedience to authority hasn't led to despair, and to both figurative and literal mass suicide before. The Germans only said they were only following orders from their fuhrer; and so were the people in Jonestown following their prophet's order to drink poison.

Plenty of nonsensical rules in the bible, my friend. And Yahweh has issued so many bad commands, particularly in the Old testaments with violent punishments. Like, ordering to kill first born children, who have nothing to do with enslaving Jews as they are too young to be involved nor make any decisions. Not to mention the really weird accounts on Lot's family, starting with the arbitrary command to not look back while Sodom was being smite, resulting in Lot's wife turning to a pillar of salt.

I don't like all of these, and even if they are true accounts, then the whole world just blindly follows a power-tripping deity who punishes innocent children, and turn someone into a pillar of salt for breaking a command that serves no purpose and has no sense in its nature whatsoever. Only an absolute ruler could make such rules and commands with no sense-- like ordering not to eat the fruit of knowledge. What is so bad with eating the fruit of knowledge? Everyone wants knowledge after all, right?

Interesting. But not to be facetious, if one reads carefully, literally and critically the story of garden of Eden, one could easily asks "Okay, what is actually bad with eating the apple of knowledge? Everyone wants knowledge, right?" I have thought about this when I was a child. But I brushed it off because the church teach that the moral of the story is to follow god etc, or you will be punished. I guess the point of that story worked on me as I let go of that nagging feeling the it doesn't add up. Religion discourages one from thinking critically even at the face of irrational and illogical inconsistencies; resulting in adopting a double think.

When did the story of Prometheus came? I assumed the Greek myths either came before, or more or less at the same time as the Torah.

Shush... if theists could read they'd be upset!

I had a boss who got married when he was 40 as well. Same as others, I'm also unmarried and in early 30s, but I don't feel the need to keep up with the Joneses either. I still have many things to do before I feel the need to settle down. There are plenty of people who marry late and don't regret it. It's best to figure out first what you want before jumping the gun, simply for the sake of social conformance and then regret it. I'm sure we know of people regretting marrying early, or stick to an unhappy marriage out of insecurity or for whatever reason.

which are clearly fanfic and everyone pretends like they are real.

"Oh WhO cArEs?! ThEy aRe sTilL eNtErTaInInG! "- thirteen year olds