Ah, heck. I thought it was a witch's curse. You're telling me time fried this rice?
Was this written by a known homophobe or "priest" or something? You're calling out hypocracy, but all I see is a poem stating "Christians shouldn't hate the Gays." I didn't get "The church is accepting of everyone" out of it at all.
Im stealing AI theist. That's unreasonably clever
I'd have voted Third Party. Shame they're Someone Else's VP
Oh lmao, I misspoke. Thanks
SW on the crash: "We love safety. Nothing is more important than safety! Don't associate our brand with negative feelings, associate it with safety instead :)"
Fucking lmao
Are you aware of medicine? It's pretty rude to say "im not disabled like you. It'd be wrong for you to not suffer," as you did.
Wow, I can't believe doom is so young! It's been a cultural juggernaut my entire life, so it's weird to think of Doom as "releasing."
IF you define taking and shrinking a corpse's. head as a violation of the rights of that corpse's human rights, then yes. Of course, I disagree with most of what you asserted. I guess my first two questions are "Why does a corpse get rights?" and really just.. generally.. with the moral system thing. If one feels "the environment" is more important than a human, then they should be pro-kill-all-humans?? I'm not sure that tracks. Most societies have a moral system that's a little more complicated than "destroy everything that's not the most morally significant to protect it from being hurt by less moral things."
Anyway, interesting question! Maybe we should talk about corpse rights as a new category of rights? Less important, perhaps, than living humans, but more important than nothing?
"Hey everyone, 198-fucking-4 here. Unlike some other people, I don't feel the need to tell others about myself. No, my opinions are my own and I'm keeping them to myself. The fewer people read this, in fact, the better!"
\>plunder content from yesterday
Im not sure if you can tag people here. If you can, could someone get this nerd's attention?