Because most disagree that it isn't real. Aetheism is by no means a common outlook
Sorry to burst your bubble but POTUS is a management position. You oversee millions of jobs as the head of the Executive branch.
It is a job that the vast majority do not have the skills or temperament to manage with any degree of competence. The plantation owner who oversaw the hundreds of jobs/slaves of the past might have been able to be the head of a smaller and weaker government but the modern farmer isn't going to have skills that transfer to POTUS.
The reason why it's finance, politicians, and lawyers that end up in the job is those are the fields whose skills actually do transfer.
POTUS isn't an entry level job. You should have governmental experience and a history of managing large organizations.
They did and I thought it was new back then but I was wrong.
It's like "bet" in that I thought that was also newer when it came back until I watched Eddie Murphy hosting SNL for the first time and he used it in the monologue.
*11 as you cannot fluently speak Latin as many pronunciations aren't likely accurate to the time.
Was Spez the one backing crypto? I thought that was Alex Ohanian the other living founder.
That isn't a fallacy either. If they knew about the NBER or not "they" did not change the definition. The definition they thought was correct is an oversimplification and was not correct.
POTUS shouldn't be an entry level job.
You can buy Gros Michel bananas still you just have to put in some effort. If you are in the USA and have the cash the Miami Fruit Co ships them when they grow them. I haven't checked but I believe they are in banana season.
OP has no idea who NBER was so "they" would be the government.
Do context clues exist in your first language?
No they didn't. That was the result of years of absolutely moronic economic and monetary policy combined with a ton of theft by people at the top levels of government and the national oil company.
The USA isn't helping Venezuela's government to steal from it's people since they stopped getting a cut.
They does apply to a specific entity since the discussion is overtly about America.
"They" changed the definition would mean the US government changed the definition and that is incorrect.
And now that I have explained 3rd grade English grammar to you regarding how pronouns work, I think we can stop here. You were not paying any attention to the subject at and kept losing the thread and then resorting to bs when this was pointed out.
The article this whole thread is about discusses the chances for a recession in AMERICA, so Im not the only one saying they=American.
This isn't semantics. You have not been paying any attention to the subject at hand. Might I suggest you look at the title of the linked article?
Im not a troll you just do not seem to understand how to have a discussion.